11th Wicket Progressive First-Class Partnerships for Men

Progressive 11th wicket records for English counties in 12-a-side men's first-class matches (minimum partnership of 10)

Hampshire
13HE Harris, FGG JellicoeMCCAntelope Ground, Southampton1880CA/Hants Advertiser 28 Aug 80
Kent
12E Henty, R Lipscombv Gentlemen of MCCCanterbury1868Cricket Archive
37GG Hearne, E Hentyv Gentlemen of MCCCanterbury1876Cricket Archive
Lancashire
22J Crossland, G Nashv Oxford UniversityThe Prks, Oxford1885Cricket Archive
At home
14AT Kemble, AW Moldv Oxford UniversityManchester1893Cricket Archive
Middlesex
17? and M Flanaganv Oxford UniversityLord’s1877Cricket Archive
I have been unable to identify Flanagan’s partner from the BNA, but reports confirm that he was last man in.
28AL Stewart, J Robertsonv Oxford UniversityLord’s1880CA/Morning Post 18 June 80
In first innings. In second innings, CE Cottrell/FT Wenman added 23 for the 11th wicket.
Somerset
32GW Hodgkinson, GD Barnev Oxford UniversityThe Parks, Oxford1904CA/The Sportsman 14.5.04
Surrey
25DLA Jephson, C Marshallv Cambridge UniversityCambridge1894CA/Various in BNA (see note 1)
Sussex
21HR Butt, CHG Blandv Oxford UniversityHove1903See note 2
Yorkshire
27HE Rhodes, G Pinderv MCCScarborough1878Cricket Archive
  1. Several newspaper reports in the BNA confirm that Jephson was Marshall’s partner, and not Tom Richardson as the scorecard might suggest.
  2. Cricket Archive does not have the FoW for the 10th wicket, but has the last two wickets adding 49; this figure is confirmed by the report in Sporting Life on 29 June 1903. The Nottingham Evening Post on 27 June states that the 10th wicket partnership was worth 28, which leaves 21 for the 11th wicket.
  3. Neither of the other counties playing 12-a-side fc matches (Glos, Worcs) produced an 11th wicket partnership of as many as 10. Glos’s no. 12 dnb in their only such match (v OU at Bristol [Fry’s Ground] in 1924), while Worcs’ best was 9 by MFS Jewell & JC Barley in their only such match, against OU in The Parks in 1909.
  4. The above details relate to first-class 12-a-side matches only. They therefore exclude performances in first-class odds matches (such as in the ’XIII [or more] of Kent v England’ fixture played in the Canterbury Festival between 1860 and 1881).

 

Keith Walmsley