James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Companion 1885

188 01 B atting A verages . • Times Most in In n s . not out. Buns. an Inns . M. C. K o m p ......................... ... 16 2 411 95 H. V. Page ......................... ... 11 1 363 72 T. C. O’B r i e n ......................... ... 16 1 375 92 K> J , Ive> .»• ••• ... 13 2 263 55 J . 11. Brain ... ... ... ... 16 0 322 75 T. It. Hine-llnycock ... 16 2 2J5 68 B. E. Nicbolls .............. ... 12 2 116 41 E. 11. Buckland .............. ... 8 ' . 1 89 23 H. 0 . W h i tb y ......................... ... 11 • 3 76 21 L. D. H ildyard .............. ... 3 1♦ 14 * 11 E. W. Bastard .............. .... 11 4 41 17 B owling A verages . Overs. Maidens. Buns. Wickets. E. 11. Buckland ... »•» ... 91.1 48 135 13 11. V. Pago ... ... 215.3 111 361 27 H. 0 . W h i tb y .......................... ... 101.2 132 830 63 E. W. Bastard .............. ... 405.3 170 678 34 B. E. NicholLs......................... ... 226.2 80 424 20 # - K . J. K ey bowled in one in n in g s :—16 overs, 4 m a idens , 32 runs, 2 wickets. 23.10 21.7 21.1 1'tG 12.5 8.7 7.3 5.6 Huns per Wkt. 10.5 . 13.13 15.35 •17 21.4 BRASENOSE COLLEGE. 4 * % P A • » > ▼ t * * ▼ », \ ^ '. V Capt., W . M. Tatham ; Sec,, H. H. D ob in son ; Treas., H. T . Arnall. Colours, black and gold . Matches, 13—won 3, lost 2, drawn 8. A. G. G. Asher, a fine dashing bat, and scored consistently in the tew inn ings he p layed for the co l le g e ; brilliant field! A. S. Blair, very fine bat, w ith fast run -getting pow ers ; a fast b ow le r ; of great use at times, but inclined to be short. II. H. Dobinson, good , steady bat, with much improved h itting p ow e rs ; safe field. H. T. Arnall, slow left-hand bow ler, with good com­ mand o f the ball both as regards p itch and b r e a k ; hard hitter, generally making runs when most wanted. W . M. Tatbam , began the season in great form, but fellolf considerab ly towards the e n d ; excellent cover -po in t , and good captain . W. J. Barry, a pretty bat, but lacks p ow e r ; rather slow in the field. J. A. Dun, scarcely so success­ fu l with th e bat as he was in the prev ious year, seemed to have lost some of his old freed om ; fine field at long leg . A . M. Latham fe ll short o f last year ’ s form with the bat, but was inva luab le as w icket-keeper . H. II. Castens, pow erfu l bat, but wants confidence ; ought to be v e ry useful this y e a r ; fa ir in the field. W. M. Pike, steady bat, with small run -ge tt ing p ow e r s ; excellent po in t . I. F . Jardine, good bowler, with great p a c e ; pow erfu l h i t t e r ; rather slack in the field. B aiting A verages . Times Most in I n n s . . n o t out. Buns. an Inns . Aver. A. G. G. Asher ... ... ... 4 0 146 69 3G.1 A. S. Blair ............... ...........................6 0. 175 54 20.1 H. H. Dob inson ... * ...............16 1 340 . - 105* 22.10 W . M. Tatham .... ...........................13 2 181 82* 16.8 H . T. A rna ll ............... ........................ 11 2 145 35 1G.1 W . J . Barry ............... .............. 10 0 < 135 55 13.5 J. A. Dun ............... ...........................13 0 167 23 12.11 V A A. M. Latham , ... ............... • ... 15 0 , 156 35 10.6 H. H. Castens ...........................10 1 96 20 10.6 W. M. P ike ............... ... 13 0 85 12 6.7 I. F. Jarr ing ... r ... ... ... ... 7 0 ■ 2 31 26 1 6.4 * Not out. ft