James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Companion 1885

135 innings of 56, though marred by an ungainly style, was a model of care and patience, i uli score and bowling analysis CAMBR IDGE . C. W. W right, b W h itb y ............... H. W. B a inb r idge , l b w . b W h itby J. E. K . Studd, c and b Bastard ... p. J. De P a ra v ic in i , b W h itb y ... D. G. Sp iro , c and b W h itby Hon. J. Mansfield, b Page ‘ ............... j . A. Turner, b W h itby F. Marchant, 1 b w , b W h itby C. W. R o ck , c N icholls , b Bastard C. A. Smith, n o t o u t ........................... H. G. Topham , b Bastard .............. B 8 ,1 b 1 ....................................... Total • • • « » » J. H. Bra in , c and b Smith T. R . H in e -H ay co ck , b R o ck ... T. C. O’ Brien, b Ba inbridge ... H. V . Page , b T u r n e r ........................ M. C. K emp , c Sm ith, b R ock ... K. J. K ey , run ou t ........................ L. D. H ildyard , st W r igh t, b Turner. 1st Inns . 2nd Inn s . • i # 16 c Kemp , b Page » • * 34 • • • 2 c Kemp , b Bastard ... • • • 29 • • 1 4 c and b Buckland ... 28 • « # 37 b W h itby ............... 10 • # • 10 b Bastard ............... • f i O M # 18 b W h itby .............. M i 5 • • • i b Wh itby ............... t i l 1 M i 0 b Bastard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • i t O • i f 8 c Kemp, b Page i i # 60 M i 0 not o u t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i i i 0 6 c Kemp, b W h itby . . . • • • 0 # » • 9 B 9, J b 4, w 1 • • • 14 • i i I I I Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i l l 177 OXFORD . 42 E. II. Buckland, b Bainbridge • • • 18 40 B. E . Nicholls, c. Marchant, b Topham 35 0 E. W . Bastard, b Smith • • • • • • 17 25 H. O. Wh itby , not out i t # • • • 3 2 B 5, 1 b 1, w 1, n b 1 • • • • • • 8 17 9 Total # t i #•# 209 In the second inn ing s H ine-Haycock scored (not out) 35, Brain (b Rock) 0, O’ Brien (b R ock ) 0, Page (c Turner, b Topham ) 38, Kemp (not out) 3. B 3, w 1. Total 80. BOWLING ANALYSIS . C ambridge .—F irst I nnings . S econd I nnings . Whitby Bastard Nicholls Page Buckland ••• . . . ••• V * •. . . ••• Overs. Mdns. Runs. Wkts. M l I M 13 51 6 . . . ••• 23.3 10 29 3 ... . .. 13 5 17 0 m i 3 ••• 2 5 1 O xford .—F irst I nnings . Overs. Mdns. Runs. Wkts. .............23 9 37 2 0 9 0 ... 17 1 63 2 ... ... 21.1 7 36 2 . .. hi 27 10 63 1 • * M 11 5 22 2 Rock Bainbridge Smith Topham Turner __ Studd . .. ••• ••• *•* - . , , ,, Ba inbridge bow led a wide and a no ball. • M • • • f ♦ • • • • # ♦ t Overs. Mdns. Runs. Wkts. 41 15 62 4 46 27 35 3 20 10 22 0 23 11 31 2 19 13 13 1 Bastard bowled a wide. S econd I nnings . Overs. Mdns. Runs. Wkts. 14 8 13 2 5.2 1 14 0 11 2 29 0 6 2 11 1 6 3 7 0 3 1 2 0 Studd bowled a wide. RESULTS OF PAST UN IVERS ITY MATCHES. 1829. Oxford won by 115 runs. 1830. Oxford won by 121 runs. 1838. Oxford won by 98 runs.^ 1839. Cambridge won in one innings and 125 runs. 1840. Cambridge won by 03 runs. 1841. Cambridge won by 8 runs. ^ 1842. Cambridge won by 10- run ,. 1843. Cambridge won by 04 runs. 1845. Cambridge won by 6 wicket. . 1846. Oxford won by 8 1847. Cambridge won by 138 run .. 1848. Oxford won by 23 runs. 1849. Cambridge won by 3 w ickets . 1850. Oxford won b y 127 runs. 1861. Cambridge won in one innin 4 runs. 1852. Oxford won in one inn ings and 77 runs. 1853. Oxford wron in ono inn ings and 19 runs. 1854. Oxford won in one innings and 8 run 8. 1855. Oxford won b y 3 w ickets. 1856. Cambridge won b y 3 w ickets 1857. Oxford won b y 81 run