James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Companion 1885

123 J u ly 9, B r e n tw o o d . J n ly 24, W e l l in g b o r o u g h . Auer. 14. £ t . A lb a n s . r A u g 20, B r e n tw o o d . A u g . 22, " L o r d ’ s , l s t In n B * rts ‘ e* ...................................................... 164 N o r f o lk . . . ...................... . ..............] 20 D r aw n . Essex had lo s t 3 w ic k e t s . ......................................................... 263 N o r th am p to n sh ir e ........................... 2 0 5 D r aw n . E ssox had lost on e w ic k e t . ..................................................................................................................................................... W erts * m . . . ••• 530 D r aw n . E ssex h ad los t 9 w ick e ts . K sbcx '•» ••• ....................... ]75 N o r t h a m p t o n s h i r e .................................... 7G D r a w n . E ssex had lost 4 w ic k e t s . E ssex ............. . . . . . . 126 M .C .C . a n d G r ou n d .......................... 9 6 E s sex w o n b y 6 w ick e t s . HE8ULTS OF MATCHES. 2nd In n s . 82 259 213 12 190 117 146 B A T T IN G A V E R A G E S . T o ta l . 246 379 270 205 333 630 187 266 243 212 % In n s . • a 0 R u n s . M ost in an In n s . M ost in a M a tch . T im es n o t ou t . A v e r . H. F ow le r ... m • • • a t ... 4 94 41 65 2 47 D. W om e r s le y • i t ... 5 134 • - 65 72 1 33.2 H . G . Ow en i n ... 12 * 238 69 102 0 19.10 W . F r a n c i s # < • • i » ... 12 201 61 64 1 18.3 F . P . F r a n c is h i a • a ... 7 109 33 66 1 18.1 Jones m % • 1 . . . 16 260 46 66 1 17.5 Curtis • • # . . . 7 123 43 60 0 17.4 A lm ond • • • ... 6 103 — . 68 70 0 17.1 S i lc o ck • • • l i t ‘ . . . 14 202 56 66 2 16.10 F . H . S te v en s a a • • • a . . . 7 116 68 58 0 16.4 R o b e r t s . . . 4 40 2 8 ' 35 1 16.1 C. E . G reen • t i l * . . . 9 125 * 90 90 1 15.6 G. M ‘ Ew en a • • . . . 7 85 43 68 1 14.1 J . J . R e a d . . . . . . 7 84 68 74 1 _ A 14 P ick e t t a a a . . . 11 89 39 44 3 11.1 K irkm an . . . . . . 9 49 22* 22 4 9.4 H . R . B a g o t I I I I l f . . . 3 13 * N o t ou t . 8* 8 1 6.1 BOW L IN G A V E R A G E 8 . In n s . Overs . M a idens . R u n s . W ic k e t s . A v e r . S i l c o c k 14 t i l • • • * 506 220 743 48 15.23 Jones ... i o 1 • • . 1 " 218.2 72 484 . 28 17.8 K irkm a n • • • ••♦11. 120.2 48 231 11 21 P ick e t t ■ i f » • » # • • 13 325.3 109 708 31 22.26 NOKFOLK. Sec., A. J. Clarke, Esq., Queen Street, Norwich. Tlie results of the season compare favourably w ith those of 1883, hut it must he stated that the hopes held out for the County have scarcely been borne out. A great loss was sustained in Mr. P. H. Morton going over to Surrey. In 1883 Mr. Morton took 30 wickets for just over 9 runs each, and an idea wi l l readily he gained of how much his services were missed. The battin <r averages come out extremely well, and it w ill he seen that no fewer 'than sixteen men average double figures. Messrs. C. P. W ilson and C. H. Morrice have both done very well, hut their performances are hardly so good as those of Mr. L. K. Jarvis and Hansell, who took part in a far greater number of matohes, The two professionals, Hansell and