James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Companion 1884

197 A. G. B. West F Marshall j, LeFleming T. P. Draper W.Rashleigh 0. Huhbard j.W. Little 0. C. Hubbard E. Giles ... W. T. H. Danin F. G. Hayward. G. C. Hubbard A. G. B. West E. Gils** •• ♦ • • • • t • BATTING AVERAGES. Times Inns. not out ... 12 2 ..........11 2 ..........12 3 ..........11 0 ..........12 0 ..........12 0 ..........12 0 .......... 8 2 .......... 9 2 ..........10 I ... ... 9 2 • Not out. BOWLING AVERAGES. Balls. Maidens »- ... 773 51 ..........822 62 ... ... 395 21 ROSSALL SCHOOL. Runs. Most in an Inns. Aver. 193 94 19.3 181 72 20.9 329 112* 39.8 90 30 8.1 621 125 43.4 375 164 31.25 174 69 14.5 89 17 11.7 122 62* 17.3 75 29* 8.3 112 27* 16 Runs Runs. Wickets. . per Wkt. 325 41 7.9 368 20 17.9 208 10 20.9 Captain, C. P. H astings . Matches, 17—won 5, lost 6, drawn 6. C. P. H astings ,* a really good left-handed bat; has scored brilliantly throughout theseason; a sharp field at point; as captain, he has done his utmost for the success of the team. R. W. L. F ernandes , * in batting has disappointed us, thoughhe has certainly had bad luck in every way; cuts prettily; a fair field, and can bowl as a change. C. M. J ohnstone ,* always to be relied on for runs; hits very hard and sure on the on side; bowled very well all through the season; has improved his delivery wonderfully; a certain catch. A. M. K night * fell off decidedly in baiting; kept wicket with fair success throughout the season. F. C. S itwell , a very pretty bat, though he utterly failed to score at the close of the season; ought to make a good bat for next year’s eleven ; a poor field. B. L. LKESMiTii,,a good bat, though hardly reliable at present; cuts brilliantly, but is somewhat weak on the leg side ; an excellent field at long leg. L. M. O wen * thoroughly earned his place in the eleven by his exceptionally fine fielding; very fast, and picks up clean; a peculiar bat. J. B lackwall , a most promising young player; has played some excellent innings, and has been of the greatest service to the team; a fair change bowler; weak in the field. H. L ockhart has proved a very effective slow howler; gets a lot of work on the ball, but is not quite certain of his pitch; pays great attention to coaching, and has improved his batting wonderfully. 0. E. T unmcliffk , a good fast bowler on a dead wicket; gets runs against slow bowling, an excellent held. J. T. R oblnson , a good bat, but rather slow; should learn to play harder; an excellent long-stop. A. L. H udson bowled well in the last two or three matches; can field excellently when he likes: a careless hat. * Has left. BATTING AVERAGES. Times Most in Inns. not out. Runs. an Inns. Aver. 0. P. Hastings .......... • • • 4 W ... 22 2 618 74 27.8 R. W. L. Fernandes 9 • • 4 9 4 . . . 18 2 157 28 9.13 U M. Johnstone.......... 9 9 9 ... 20 1 354 47 18.12 A. M. Knight .......... • ^ “ • • • ... 20 1 160 26 8.8 P. C. Sewell .......... A A M ... 19 0 166 71 8.4 B. L. Leesmith.......... • A • A A A ... 14 2 120 63 10 L. M. Owen .......... ... 17 3 102 31 7.4 J. Blackwall ......... ’ • • • ... 19 3 249 64 15.9 E. Tunnicliffe • • • ... 18 6 73 21 6.1 H. Lockhart .......... • • • ... 19 2 260 67 15.5 J. T. Robinson • • • • • • ... 10 2 75 16 9.3 A. L. Hudson .......... 9 9 9 9 9 9 4 9 9 4 + 9 ... 14 1 63 14 4*11