John and James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Companion 1882

71 » • r rashire was at a serious disadvantage through the absence of Mr. A . (i <tccl Home splendid all-round cricket was shown, and at the call of time on the second evening, Yorkshire had 8 wickets to fall, and wanted 1-0 runs ° Unfortunately, rain fell in torrents on the \\ ednesday morning, ind on a saturated wicket the home team had little prospect of success. Yash’s bowling proved difficult, and the 8 wickets tell for 61) runs. 1he Yorkshiremen made several blunders in the field, for which they had to pay verv dearly. For the winning county Barlow made 5 and oft (a very fina innings, bar an easy chance at point, when he had scored 29) Mr. 1). Q. Steel 36 and 21, Mr. Hornby 46 and 4, Briggs 24 and 24, and Hobiuson 2J and 14 ; while for Yorkshire, Lockwood made 73 and 36, and Emmett 1L and 30. Lockwood never played better, his batting being indeed the special feature of the match. In the second innings of Yorkshire, Mr. Hornby die-' missed Ulyett by a marvellous one-handed catch in the long field. Mrf Miller took 7 Yorkshire wicket* for 100 runs. July 21.—Maidstone.—Yorkshire v. Kent.— ( See Kent Review.) J ’ 1st Inns. 2 nd Inns. Total. July 25, Yorkshire * -* 110 121 237 Sheffield. Gloucestershire 150 88 . 238 Gloucestershire won by 5 wickets. The Yorkshiremen played under great disadvantages, being without the services of both Ulyett and Hill. Nevertheless, they made a good fight of it, and only suffered defeat by 5 wickets. Midwinter played fine all round cricket for Gloucestershire, scoring 30 and 43, and taking 11 wickets for 8b*runs. The chief scorers for Yorkshire were E. Lockwood 30 and 23, Grimshaw 22 (not out) and 16, and H. Lockwood 7 and 31. Mr. W . G. Grace failed completely in this match, only scoring 8 and 10, and not taking a wicket. Mr. Cranston made 42 and (not out) 10, and Mr. E. M. Gracd 22 and (not out) 15. July 28.—Manchester.—Yorkshire v. Lancashire.— (Sec Lancashire Review .) Aug. ].—Derby.—Yorkshire v. Derbyshire.— ( See Derbyshire Review.') A n ^ 1 Yorkshire v. Surrey.— {See Surrey Review .) -Yorkshire v . Gloucestershire.— (See Gloucester - ug. 11.—Oval. Aug. 15.—Cheltenham. 'hire Review.) Aug. 18, Huddersfield. 153 105 Total, 303 288 On __ _ , 1st Inns. 2 nd Inns, xorkshire 150 Middlesex 183 Yorkshire won by 15 runs. A capital match, though bad weather seriously affected the wicket, he Saturday afternoon Middlesex went in with onlv 121 to get to win, but lates proved very difficult, and took 6 wickets for 56 runs. Messrs, aravicmr and Robertson were out through want of judgment in running, a a d e V n ? T ,g u * r oeo be*a different. For the horne team Grimshaw ndFmnfil? « ’ 2 2 - d °,’ U17e« 32 and 9, E. Loekwood 5 and 36, 4dAH Leslie ?qd 3,1,o A?r ^ lddlesex H»n- Alfred Lyttelton scored 42 and > B Studd I s t n d S . ’ ’ PearS° Q 8 Ol0t ° Ut) and 24 fuot out>> and Mr. Aug. 22, Bradford. i i . 1st Inns. 2nd Inns. Yorkshire 141 __ Derbyshire 70 __ Owinrr o 4 . ^ ra'vn* Yorkshire had lost 9 wickets. O a tremendous downpour of rain, play was impossible after the Total. 141 76