John and James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Companion 1882

136 Match. • . West Kent v. Will o’ tho W isps........................................ . . Hastings v. C( lvcston ................................................ . . Richmond v. Emeriti....................................................... . . Richmond v. Ulster . . . . • • • • • • • • • • . . . United Northern of Glasgow v. Blair Lodgo School . . Worksop v. Sheffield Shrewsbury ............................... . . Sutton v. Leatherhead • • • • • • • • % • • • • . 125 . . Leeds G. N. R. Loco. Bop. v. Potorboro G. N. R. L. Dep. *n4 . . R. M. Colloge v. Buckhurst , * .................................. .... . . Swanmore Park v. Winchester Garrison............................... . . Servants v. Seamen of R. M. S. Guadiana ................... .... # . Plymouth Garrison v. Plymouth ...................................... . . K. T. L.’ a v. Trinity College, Cambridge............................... . . Walton Lancashire v. Stand . . . . ........................... 105 . . Christ College, Brecon, South Wales, v. Brecon . . . . l0g . . Uppingham Coll., G. Field’ s Sido v. A. Rotlicrham’ s Side * 102 . . Mr. Caitloy’ s Eloven v. Burton Club ........................... 139 . . S urrey v . K e n t ............................... ..... ..................................... Ko Renny-Tailyour, II. W. Royal Engineers v. West Kent Engineers ................... 12 $ Reynolds, H................Burnley v. B u r y ........................................................................ Rhodes, H. E...............Orleans Club v. Bolfast Wanderers . . . . . . . . . . 151 Name. Penn, F. . . . Phillips, A. Phillips, H. C. , Phillips, H. C. . Pig?, H. . . . Finder, G. Pooloy, E. Priestley . . . Prinsep, J. F. M. Protliero . . . Pullen . . . Quill, Lieut. Ramsay, R, C. . Ramsey, W. A. Rawson, W. S. Read, M. . . . Read, W. W. . R ead , W. W. 1st Royal Dragoons v. Royal Horse A rtillery ...................12o Huddersfield v. Dewsbury Savile ...................................lti; I Zingari v. It. M. A., Woolwich .................................. Lo Exeter College v. New Collego, Oxford ........................... log Torquay v. Emeriti ............................................................. 135 Whitchurch (Salop) v. Wem . ........................................124 Clergy Orphan School v. Chilham Castle...........................I 49 University Wanderers v. Clergy Orphan School Canterbury 105 East Kent Wanderers v. Chatham House ...................175 Mr. Roe’ s Elovon v. Sherborne School . . . . . . . , 114 Magdalene v. St. John’s, Cambridgo ...........................114 Sovernake Forest v. Swindon ............................................ *103 Bootle v. Walton (Second Eleven) .................................. 122 Chardstock College v. Rev. G. H. P. Barlow’ s Eleven . , 122 Dalkeith v. Edinburgh Academy .....................................*113 Dalkeith v. Selkirk .................. 102 Upper Tooting v. Old M arlburians ......................................100 Incogniti v. Royal Military College, Sandhurst . . . . 126 1st Battalion Grenadier Guards v. R.H C., Sandhurst . . 113 Nottingham Commercial v. Leicester .............................. 119 M.C.C. and Ground v. Notts C a s t l o .................................. 113 Lansdown v. C l i f t o n ............................................................*156 Lansdown v. T row br idge ..................................................... 171 Orleans Club v. 6 th Regt............................... 102 Royal High School v. Edinburgh University................... *102 Royal Engineers, Seniors v. Juniors...................................... 102 Saunders.Davies, H. G.Winchester College v. Winchester Garrison ................... 118 Schultz, S. S...............Orleans Club v. Hounslow Garrison...................................... *112 Schultz, S. S...............Orleans Club v. Mr. W. C. Wilkinson’s Team . . . . , . 118 Scott, Rev. H. von E. The Lindens v. St. Leonards School ............................... 145 The Lindens, St. Leonards, v. Bexhill ...............................105 Eastbourne v.' Holbom ......................................................106 Clergy Orphan School v. Ilarlbedown ................... ! 126 Rhodes, Lieut. Ricketts, J. . . Ridley, A. W. . . Ridley, T. G. Ridley, Capt. C. P. Robinson, W. H. W. Roe, W. N. , Roe, W. N. Roe, W. N. Roe, W. N. Roe, W. N. Rolf, W. G. Rogers, J. Rogers, P. J. M. Roland, W. M. . Roland, W. M. . Roller, W. E. . Ross, H. . . . Rowley, Col. . Royle, G. M. Russel, J. S. Sainebury, E. . Sainsbury, E. . Sandeman, F. . Sanderson, F. R. Savage, Capt. J. W. Scott, Rev. H. ron E. Scott, Rev. H. von E. Scott, Rev. H. von E. Scott, Rev. H. von E. Scott, Rev. H. von E. Scott, Rov. H. von E. Scotton, W. . . . SCOTTON, W. . . . Sharp, C. Clergy Orphan School v. Ilarlbedown (Return) . . . * 1 0 2 Lindens, St. Leonards University v . Army ...................... *105 S. Flowers’ Eleven v . Barclay ’s Eleven . . * * * * * 144 M.C.C. and Ground v. Christ’ s College, Finchl'ey ** ** 101 M.C.C. and G round v . E ngland . . . . * * * * 100 Horsham v. M i t c h a m ............................... II I I I I II 100 Sharp, C...........................Horsham v. Tho Lncas Eleven . . . ** * * * * * 334 Sharpe, A. C.................. Accountants v . Solicitors o f Huddersfield * * * * 121 Sharpe, Rev. C. M. . 0 Huddersfield v. Lockwood . . ...............................* * * 119 Sherrard. C. W. , . Officers v. Non-commissioned Officers, &c. (Soufcheea) ’ * 130 Sh orter ,S . . . . . Crystal Palace v. C l a p t o n ........................................ * # * n o Shuter, J ......................... Bexley v . Hundred of I I o o ........................................ * * i 60