James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1899

1 6 8 L I L L Y W H I T E ' SC R I C K E T E R S' A N N U A L. R U G B YS C H O O L . Captain for 1898.-C. S. Hannay. R e s u l t so f M a t c h e s . Matches played , 11 ; won, 3 ; drawn , 6 ; lost , 2. Club. Opnts. Where played . Whenplayed . 1st 2nd 1st 2nd Opponents. W o nb y. Ins. Ins. Ins. Ins. Matches Won(3). Liverpool... Rugby M a y2 7 1 4 5 Balliol College R u g b y J u n e1 1 *2 3 3 Butterflies R u g b y J u n e27, 2 8 8 3 *56 62runs; *2 w d 1 2 0 1 1 3run ; *6w d 183 *57 53 186 9 wkts; *1w d MatchesD r a w n(6) . R e m a r k s. N e wCollege M a y31 # F r e eForesters Rugby J u n e1 3,1 4 2 6 4 2 3 41 1 8 *6 w d O l dRugbeians R u g b y J u n e24, 25 2 3 4*47 293 +90 #M . C . C. andGround R u g b y July8, 9 1 3 7 226 281 #4 9 *1 w d; +5 wd #3 w d RugbyClub R u g b y July1 6 *1 5 8 + 2 0 2 *7 w d; 15w d M A R L B O R O U G HCOLLEGE Lord's July 27, 28 3 0 4 284 *47 *1 w d Matches Lost (2) . Lostb y. Trinity College R u g b y M a y1 4 8 4 1 1 1 2 7r u n s OrielCollege R u g b y J u n e9 1 5 9 2 3 1 7 2r u n s ‡1 2a-side. B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S . Inns. T i m e s notout. M o s tin R u n s. a nInns. C. S. H a n n a y 1 2 1 3 4 3 6 5 Average. 3 1 . 1 8 H .C. Grenside 4 2 5 9 2 6* 2 9 . 2 E .W .Dillon 1 2 2 2 9 2 1 0 6* 2 9 . 2 H .B. Grylls 9 1 2 6 0 6 4 2 7 . 5 P .M .M o r r i sD a v i e s 1 2 0 2 9 0 1 2 8 24.16 C . J. P a r t o n 1 1 1 2 2 6 7 8 2 2 . 6 C. A .G. Luther 1 0 1 1 3 7 3 9 1 5 - 2 2 A .E.Morris 8 4 4 3 1 6* 1 0 . 7 5 H .F. Cobb 6 0 5 2 2 9 8 . 6 6 A . C. Gemmell 2 1 8 6 8 C .B .H e n d e r s o n 3 0 3 2 1 B O W L I N GA V E R A G E S . Overs. Maidens. R u n s. Wickets. Average. C . J. P a r t o n 1 3 1 5 0 5 1 0 A .E. Morris 2 1 6 5 0 5 6 4 4 1 13-75 C.A .G. Luther 1 8 3 3 5 2 1 7:5 C .S. H a n n a y 2 8 6 9 2 5 1 8 2 9 1 7 . 8 6 H .B. Grylls 7 4 . 2 1 6 2 3 2 1 1 21.09 A .C. G e m m e l l 1 3 3 4 5 2 2 2 . 5 E .W .D i l l o n 8 7 1 3 2 7 4 8 34.25 H .C.G r e n s i d e 1 1 1 5 4 1 5 4 RUGBYELEVEN IN 1898 .-* C. S. Hannay(1897-8 ) : A nexcellent captain in every way, and knew his place thoroughly . A useful bowler, but fell off towards the end of the season . A very good bat, playing a good defensive or forcing gameas the occasion required . Goodalso in the field . *C. A. G. Luther (1897-8 ) : Disappointing in his batting , though his off -driving was excellent . Agood point . E. W. Dillon (1898) : A very sound andreliable left- handbat; scores well on the leg side , but as yet lacks freedom and power. G o o dfield , and should makea very fair slow bowler . *A. E. Morris (1898) :