James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1896

304 LILLY WHITE’ S CRICKETERS ANNUAL. ' \v. n. Diver's XI., May 21. 71.—P. 0. Hawkes, Holy Trinity Boys, Folke- tone v. Stoncleigh School, July 13, 89.—P^D. Jennings, Oxford Corporation \ St Kenelm’s College. June H. 4fi.—W. Knuber, Oxford Corporation v. St. Kenelm’s College, June 3, 9 .-S . King, Oxford Corporation v. St. Barnabas C C June ‘20 31.—F. W. Lea, Burford v. Lechlade, June 18, ,)().—T. Lovelock, for C*me Hill v. Croydon, not out 68, on June 1.—W. Marsh, Holy Trinity Folkestone v. Sutherland House School, June 8, 51.—F. W. Stancomf, 1 ei hton, Westhuryv.Free Foresters, August9,105.—H. F. Stanley, Incogniti \. Christ Church, SO.—J. N. Tonge, Rickloy Park v. Tonbridge, 126.—A. Ward, Lancashire v. Leicestershire, June 2, 75.—W. Winckworth, Oxford Cor­ poration (2nd XI.) v. Cowley St. John s (2nd XI.), Aug. 17, 102. F. Woog<ir, Sheffield Park v. Newick, May 1, 116.—H. F. Stanley, Incogniti v. Crystal Palace, 101. _ _ __ Six Wickets with Successive Balls. W. M. Bradley, for Lloyd’s Register v. Old Mitcham Green, on June 15.— T. R. O’ Brien for Donald v. Albions, at Victoria, on December 23, 1894. Five Wickets with Successive Balls. E. Roche for Nondescript v. Bickley Park, on May 25tli, at Bicklev Park. Four Wickets with Successive Balls. A. Takely, for Holy Trinity Boys v. Richmond House School, on July 23 Three Wickets with Successive Balls. E. C. Wright for Thanet Wanderers v. Margate College, on July 6 .—Dr. C. D. Hamilton for Dr. Daniell’s XI. v. Portslade Wanderers, on July 25.— E. Peate for Leeds v. Armitage Bridge, at Leeds, on August 5.—Davidson for Derbyshire t . Lancashire, on August 19.—Tyler for Somersetshire v. Yorkshire, at Taunton, on August 28. —J. N. Tonge for Bickley Park ▼. Tonbridge, on August 31.—C. Wallace, Leyton v. Ilford, August 5, and for Leyton v. Loughton, August 7.—A. Watson, Leyton v. Beaumont, on August 17.—J. Kirk, Holy Trinity Boys, Folkestone v. Proloree House School, July 17.—V. F. S. Craw­ ford for Wkitgift G. S. v. Caterham “Depot, on July 3.—E. A. Eager for Brighton Club r. Royal Irish Rifles, on August 8. Big Inn ings in 1896. Lancashire v. Somerset, Taunton, July 15. 801 ; Notts v. Sussex, Notting­ ham. May 16, 726; Essex v. Somerset, Taunton, July 11, 692; Oxford University v. Sussex, Brighton, June 21, 651 ; Mr. Stoddart’s Eleven v. South Australia, Adel aide. March 28, 609; Sussex v. Cambridge University. June 20, 592 : Melbourne v. Melbourne University, Melbourne, April 20, 568 ; Middlesex v. Sussex, Brighton, June 13, 566; Surrey v. Cambridge University, Oval, May 23, 513; Melbourne v. Melbourne University, Hawthorn, January, for seven wickets, 533; Surrey v. Warwickshire, Oval, May 16, 520; Sussex v. Somerset, Brighton, June 6, 518; Cambridge University v. M.C.C. and Ground, Cambridge, June 6. 515; Sussex v. Oxford University, Brighton, June 24, 487; Lancashire v. Kent. Manchester, June 6, 487; Yorkshire v. L icestershire, Sheffield, July 15, 486; Gloucestershire v. Somerset, Bristol, *1 y 16, 171; Cambridge University v. Dublin University, Dublin, July 15,474 ; Kent v. Gloucestershire, Gravesend, May 23, 170; Kent v. Notts, Maid- July 15, 168; Somerset v. Sussex, Brighton, June 6, 465; Surrey v. 1 ;s«*x. Oval, May 13, 448; M.C.C. and Ground v. Warwickshire, Lord’s, J 148 ; Gloucestershire v. Kent, Gravesend, May 23, 413; Surrey v. * Brighton, Augustr29, 433:; Mr. C. 1. Thornton s Eleven v. Cambridge 1 diversity, Cambridge, May 16, 426; Middlesex v. Kent, Lord’s, August 29,