James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1895

T H EUNIVERSITIESA N DPUBLICS C H O O L SIN 1894. 1 4 3 J E S U SC O L L E G E . B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S . T i m e s I n n s. n o to u t. R u n s . M o s tin a nI n n s. Average. T. N. Perkins 1 4 2 5 3 7 9 8 4 4 . 9 F. L. H i n d e 1 6 2 4 7 6 9 1 3 4 . 6 W .T. C r u i k s h a n k 1 0 3 2 3 5 *9 1 3 3 . 4 C .W e l l s 1 2 1 2 9 2 4 3 2 6 - 6 P. M . Brydone 1 2 0 2 6 9 6 3 22-5 A .F i n c h 1 2 1 2 3 5 5 4 2 1 . 4 T. Burrough 1 0 0 2 1 4 9 4 2 1:4 P. L e r i c k . 1 1 5 1 3 0 3 7 2 1 . 4 E. C. Osborne S 1 1 2 9 3 5 1 8 . 3 H .G r a y 3 0 3 7 2 4 1 2 - 1 R. H. F o y 1 0 0 8 4 2 3 8.7 F. T. A n d e r s o n 6 3 1 7 *1 0 5 . 2 B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . O v e r s. M a i d e n s. R u n s. Wickets. Average T. N . P e r k i n s 1 8 0 3 5 4 1 0 4 3 9 - 2 3 H .G r a y 7 0 1 5 1 8 8 1 6 11-12 T. Burrough 1 8 9 4 7 4 3 3 3 7 1 1 . 2 6 A . F i n c h 3 5 9 7 2 6 1 2 P. L e r i c k. 6 5 1 1 1 8 6 1 4 1 3 . 4 R. H . F o y 1 7 6 3 0 4 9 0 3 3 1 4 . 2 8 C. W e l l s 3 9 2 1 3 0 7 1 9 . 3 E. C. O s b o r n e 5 8 1 2 1 5 4 7 2 2 JESUS COLLEGE ELEVENIN 1894.-T. N. Perkins (capt .) : Adashing though by no meansreckless bat ; alwaysto be relied uponfor runs. Bowledwith great success and judgment. Excellent field anywhere. As a captain , showed great keenness and discretion . A. Finch : Amuch improved bat, playing with more confidence ; madeseveral very useful scores . Good field . E. C. Osborne ; Agood cricketer ; but with disappointing results . Good field . T. Burrough : Kept up his reputation as a good steady bowler , but except for a couple of innings was disappointing in his batting . F. L. Hinde: An excellent bat, always made runs in good style . Mustimprovedin his fielding . R. H. F o y: A good fast bowler, but is easily tired . Seemedto lose all his batting of the previous year. Excellent field . C. Wells : Came on wonderfully as a batsman ; generally good for a few runs ; splendid field , while he can still bowl a bad ball as well as anyone . P. Lerick : Is generally safe for runs whenwanted; secured a few wickets , but did not howl up to his reputation . W . T. Cruikshank: A most useful bat; hits very hard while he has improved his defence . Excellent out-field . F. T. Anderson : A really first -class wicket keeper ; especially good on the leg side . If he could only improve his batting , would be good enough for any side . P. M. Brydone : Avery good and attractive bat ; well carried his place in the team. Must however improve his fielding . H. Gray: Steadied downinto a really good bowler ; fair bat. With a little morekeenness for his side , wouldbe mostuseful . O R I E LC O L L E G E . BATTING AVERAGES. -R. C. N. Palairet , 30.5 ; P. F. Warner, 29.2 ; T. C. Robinson , 19.5 ; G. R. Bardswell , 18.3 ; R. G. L. Austin, 7.4 ; W. E. Cleaver , 16 ; C. E. Nicholl , 13; A W. Isaac , 16.3 ; S. H. S. Haynes, 10.9 ; P. Lee, 22.4 ; C. F. Burroughes , 12.5 . N U M B E ROF WICKETSOBTAINEDBY--G. R. Bardswell, 37 ; S. H. S. Haynes, 19 ; R. C. N. Palairet , 8 ; R. G. L. Austin , 7 ; P. F. Warner, 5 ; C. E. Nicholl , 5. ORIEL ELEVEN IN 1894.-R. C. N. Palairet (Captain ) : A fine free bat, who played very well for the College , especially v. Jesus College , Cambridge . P. F. Warner: Batted with consistent success ; scores well all round the wicket , cutting very crisply ; a good field , and energetic secretary . T. C. Robinson : Most useful batsman, seldom failing to come off : smart field at point . R. G. L. Austin : Hardhitting bat with but little defence : has been known to bowl lobs .