James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1894

1 7 4 LILLYWHITE'S CRICKETERS' ANNUAL. Opponents . R E S U L T SO F M A T C H E S .-Continued. Club. Opnts. Whereplayed . WhenPlayed 1st 2nd 1st 2nd inn. inn. inn. inn. W o nb y W o nb y. MatchesW o n(4). H a n t s. Hogs Wellington M a y27 1 9 3 1 3 8 H A I L E Y B U R Y COLLEGE Wellington June14, 15 1 6 6 StaffCollege. Wellington July1 1 9 8 1 8 6 12 runs M.C.C. andGround Wellington July8 1 9 3 MatchesD r a w n(1). T h eMasters Wellington M a y6 *2 6 5 $155 MatchesLost (6). O l dCarthusians Wellington M a y13 8 4 2 7 2 55 r u n s 6 2 56 inns. & 48 runs 79 7 4114runs. *3 wd R e m a r k s. *5 w d. 16w d Lostb y 188runs E. M. Sturge's XI. Wellington M a y18 70 *20 164 9 4r u n s. *2 w d I. Zingari Wellington J u n e3 8 5 1 9 8 F r e eForesters.. Wellington J u n e1 0 6 6*8 01243 113r u n s 177rns*3 w d#6 w d O l dWellingtonians Wellington June2 4 8 4 2 2 7 143runs CHARTERHOUSESchool .. Charterhouse July 14, 15 2 2 0 8 5 1 9 6 213104r u n s B A T T I N G A V E R A G E S . T i m e s M o s tin I n n s. n o to u t. R u n s. a nI n n s. A v e r. B .F. B e a r d 1 3 1 3 5 3 1 3 1 29.41 R O ' H. Livesay 1 3 0 3 3 2 1 0 7 2 5 . 5 3 T. H . K. D a s h w o o d 1 3 0 2 2 4 7 6 1 7 . 3 0 H .C. A r m s t r o n g . 1 3 2 1 6 3 0... 33 1 4 . 8 1 E. R.M .English 1 2 1 1 4 5 2 8 1 3 . 1 8 C. F. Vanderbyl 4 0 5 1 2 7 1 2 . 7 5 E. E. Forbes... 1 1 1 1 2 8 4 1. 12.8 W . Mortimer. 5 0 5 1 2 0 1 0 . 2 E. H . Weigall 1 1 2 3 5 4 9 9 . 4 A. R. Vincent 3 1 1 0 9* 5 F. R . B e n s o n 9 1 2 5 1 3 3 . 1 2 B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . Overs. M d n s. R u n s. W k t s. A v e r. R. O ' H. Livesay 1 0 . 2 2 2 4 2 1 2 B .F. B e a r d 2 7 3 . 4 8 3 5 9 5 4 2 14.16 E. H.Weigall 1 4 6 . 4 3 6 3 6 6 2 2 16.85 F. R .B e n s o n 276.7 4 2 4 8 0 2 6 1 8 . 4 6 E. R. M. English 4 1 . 3 8 1 3 9 7 1 9 . 8 5 C. F. Vanderbyl ...... 3 4 6 1 2 7 5 2 5 . 4 WELLINGTON ELEVEN IN 1893. -T H KDashwood (captain ) : A much improved bat , though still rather cramped ; has been uncertain , but has played some extremely good innings : smart field . *E. E. Forbes : Bats in good style andhas some pretty strokes , but has seldom shown his real form ; good quick field . *B. F. Beard : Ahard hitter and fast run-getter when set , but apt to throw away his wicket through want of patience ; with more steadiness should makea fine bat ; has bowled steadily and well, being on a soft wicket most R. O'H. Livesey : The soundest bat in difficult ; brilliant field when roused . the team, with excellent style , and good strokes all round the wicket , but over anxious to score fast ; has done remarkably well in school matches ; fair field . * T. R. Benson : A useful fast bowler , at times proving destructive ; fair field ; poor bat . E. R. M. English : Did fairly well towards the end, but on the whole was very disappointing , not making use of his reach or power ; very fair field and change bowler . *H. C. Armstrong : Apainstaking bat, but very cramped in style ; hasbeenremakable for succeeding whenthe rest have failed ; fair field . E. H. Weigall : Batted remarkably well to begin with , with an easy style and good off strokes , but fell off very much ; very useful bowler , keeping a good length and lasting a long time . W. Mortimer : Fair left -hand bat, without much power ; should make a good player next year ; poor field . *H. C. Vanderbyl : Amoderate bat with a peculiar style , but played some useful innings and fielded remarkably well ; change bowler . A. R. Vincent : Did not play often , but kept wicket very creditably , and was generally good for some runs .