James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1894

T H EU N I V E R S I T I E SA N DP U B L I CS C H O O L S . 1 5 3 C H O R J E S U SC O L L E G E Н И Я Т Matches Played , 16 ; Won, 4; Lost, 6 ; Drawn, 6. B A T T I N GA V E R A G E . I n n s. T i m e s n o to u t. R u n s. M o s tin a nI n n s. Average.. J. C. R e e s 1 5 1 3 7 7 6 1* 2 6 . 9 2 R . W .Rice. . . 8 8 1 1 7 9 5 8 25.57 C. M. T h o m a s 1 2 1 2 2 4 6 8 2 0 . 3 6 L. M .P e n n. 9 0 1 2 8 4 0 1 4 . 2 2 T. Y o u n g 1 6 1. 1 8 9 3 0* 12.6 R .W .Clark 1 6 2 0 1 8 7 4 4. 11.68 W .E d w a r d s J. S a n t.. J. P.E v a n s.. N. E. Goddard F. E.Douglas.. 1 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 8.66 1 3 2 6 3 3 7 - 1 0 5 . 7 2 7 0 2 9 10 4 . 1 4 S 1 0 2 9 1 3* 4 . 1 4 1 4 1 4 7 1 0 3 . 6 1 R. W .Rice .. W .Edwards.. C. M . T h o m a s . N .E .G o d d a r d R . W .Clark J. C.R e e s T. Y o u n g.. f. B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . O v e r s. M a i d e n s. R u n s Wickets. Average.. 2 7 8 0907 1 1 6 . 3 6 202.1/ .!! 6 3 .) 4 5 0 1 4 0 1 1 3 8 8 1 0 9 9 1 2 . 1 1 1 2.... 2 1 5 0 3 3 5 1 1 2 4 7 .... 1 2 . 5 . . 1 9 8 4 5 5 3 6 3 3 1 9 4 7 1 6 . . 4 1 . 1 6 . 489 2 4 1 6. 16.24- 2 0 . 3 7 K O R I E LC O L L E G E . H o n. Sec. for 1894, P. E. Warner. Matches Played , 15 ; Won, 5 ; Drawn, 9 ; Lost , 1. B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S . 1 I n n s. T i m e s n o to u t. M o s tin R u n s. a nI n n s. Average.. L. C. H .Palairet 3 0 1 6 2 9 1. 5 4 W .H .B r a i n [4 0 1 5 7 9 8 0 1 3 9 . P .F. W a r n e r 1 2 10.ศ. . .: 4 6 9 1 7 . 6 . 4 0 1 5 1 0 03 9 . 1. V. T.Hill 4 1 1 1 0, 4 6 3 6 E .E . L e a 1 8 4 4 5 0 1 1 4* 3 2 . 1 E . G. M .Carmichael 1 5 4 0 0 2 9 4 4 2* 2 6 . 8 R .C. N. Palairet 4 1 0 1 .... 4 8 2 5 W .E .Cleaver 1 2 I 1 5 0 4 2 13.7 R .G. L. A u s t i n.... 1 6 . 1 1 . 2 0 0 1του 1 8 2 . 1. 5 8 11.3 T. C. R o b i n s o n 1 7 2 1 7 0 4 0 1 1 . 1 H .D. F. D a v i s 2 1 4 - 6 Bowling Analysis not kept, but E. E. Lea took 56 wkts.; W. E. Cleaver , 13 ; P. F. Warner, 10; and R. L. G. Austin, 9. ORIELELEVENIN 1893.-L. C. H. Palairet : Magnificent bat and field ; at times successful with the ball . W. H. Brain : Very fine wicket -keeper ; proved very useful as a bat. V. T. Hill : A dashing bat ; splendid field at slip . R. C. N. Palairet : Excellent bat, with beautiful style ; very safe field at slip . E. E. Lea : Goodfast bowler and was very successful ; a useful bat, but with a style of his own. E. G. M. Carmichael : Safe and useful bat ; moderate change bowler ; marvellous field at point . T. C. Robinson : Fair bat but rather unlucky ; energetic secretary.H. O. F. Davis : Useful wicket keeper ; poor bat, good field . P. F. Warner: Fine bat ; off colour at the begininng of the season , but improved as the season progressed ; fine cut behind point ; can bowl a bit . R. G. L. Austin : hits well ; amoderate lob bowler ; good cover point . W. E. Cleaver : A lelt -handed bat withgood style ; powerful on the off : fairly successful as a slow left -hand bowler .