James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1894

1 0 8 LILLYWHITE'SCRICKETERS' A N N U A L. trast started very well, the score at one time shewing 106 with only three bats- m e nout. It wasthe later batsmenthis time that failed , a result due to the effec- tive bowling of Peel who took five of the last six wickets at a cost of only eight- teen runs . B ythe commencementof the fourth innings the wicket had worncon- siderably and the Middlesex batsmen were generally so unable to cope with the fast bowling of Mr. E. Smith and Hirst that the whole side were dismissed for 82. Yorkshire accordingly won by 145 runs . Middlesex , 191 and 82, total , 273. Yorkshire , 234 and 184, total 418. Peel(Yorkshire). O v e r s.. 6 7 . 3 M a i d e n s. R u n s. 5 4 4 2 (5) M i d d l e s e xv. N o t t s. Nottingham, Aug. 17, 18, and19. W i c k e t s. 7 Awell deservedvictory for Middlesex, the moreso as theyhadhadthe worst of the early part of the game. Notts , whowent in second , were able to head their opponents ' total by 67, a success due entirely to two batsmen, Mr. J. A. Dixon (133) and W. Attewell (59), who scored eight more than the Middlesex eleven . A sMiddlesex in the second innings had lost four of their best batsmen for 40, and werethus still 27 behind , the game was then all in favour of Notts. Still , the want of Shacklock's bowling was severely felt by Notts , as subsequent events proved. At least the Middlesex tail-notably F. G. J. Ford (86) andG. McGregor (52)-punished the Notts bowlers to the ultimate tune for the last six wickets of279 runs . Notts hadat the end to bat on a pitch that had worn considerably , and they failed so completely before J. T. Hearne's bowling that the tenth wicket fell with the total only 92. Middlesex wonby160 runs . Middlesex , 184 and319, total , 503. Notts, 251 and 92, total , 343. J. T. Hearne (Middlesex ) O v e r s. B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S . 7 7 M a i d e n s. 2 9 R u n s. 1 5 3 W i c k e t s. 1 5 T i m e s I n n s. n o to u t. R u n s. M o s tin a nI n n s. Stoddart, A. Е. Ford, F. G. J. O'Brien, T. C. R a w l i n 2 6 1 1 1 7 8 1 9 5* A v e r a g e . 4 7 . 1 2 2 5 1 7 3 6 8 6 3 0 . 6 6 2 3 1 5 6 9 1 1 3 2 5 . 8 6 2 5 1 6 0 0 7 4 25.00 W e b b e, A. J. 2 8 1 6 1 0 7 7 22.59 Foley, C. P. 2 4 3 4 6 9 7 2 2 2 . 3 3 Scott, S. W . 2 1 0 5 4 6 5 9 1 2 2 . 1 4 Macgregor, G. 2 3 5 3 6 5 6 8 2 0 . 2 7 . . Lucas, R. S. 9 0 1 6 2 3 9.. 18.00 Henery, P. J. T. 2 7 2 3 6 3 6 3* 1 4 . 5 2 Douglas, J. 6 0 8 6 5 4 1 4 . 3 3 Hale,W .S. 7 1 7 7 3 6 12.83 Phillips 1 3 4 8 8 1 9 9.77 H e a r n e(J. T.) 2 7 7 1 5 8 3 5 7 . 9 0 Mordaunt, H. J. 5 0 1 8 7 3 . 6 0 Thefollowing also batted : E. A. Nepean(26*, 42, 6, 10), H. B. Hayman(9*, 27, 26*), J. Westhorpe (27 , and 9), H. Menzies (15* and 18*), Burton. (6* and 0), J. H. Hornsby (4and0), West (J. E.) (4and 5), L. C. Thomas(Oand0*), Dr. G. Thornton(1 and 0*), and E. M. H a d o w(0and2). *Signifies not out. B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . I n n s. O v e r s. M d n s. R u n s. W k t s. A v e r. Hearne(J. Т.) 3 2 1159.3... 4 6 3 2 1 9 8 1 3 7 1 6 . 0 4 R a w l i n 3 0 9 4 1 . 2.. 4 0 6 1 6 2 6 8 2 1 9 . 8 2 Stoddart, A. Ε. 2 0 218.3.. 6 7 9 1 6 . 4 9 1 2 4 2 0 . 4 5 Ford, F. G. J. 1 7 1 6 7 . 4.... 3 7 4 7 0 1 9 2 4 . 7 3 Douglas, J. 5 9 8 . 4.... 3 1 2 3 9 9 26.55 . . . . Mordaunt , H. J. 4 5 4 1 8 1 1 3 4 28.25 Phillips 1 3 161.4.... 4 5 3 8 3 1 3 29.46 N e p e a nE. A. 6 4 4 1 1 3 9 3 46.33 Webbe,A. J. 6 4 8 2 3 8 2 1 82.00 Lucas, R. S....... 4 1 1 1 4 6 0 Burton (15-4-50-0 ) bowled in two innings only, and the following butonce : Dr. G. Thornton (6-2-21-1 ), E. M. Hadow(10-2-25-0 ), J. H. Hornsby(4-0-14-0 ), andJ. Westhorpe 8-2-20-1).