James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1893

1 5 4 LILLYWHITE'SCRICKETERS' ANNUAL. C H E L T E N H A M C O L L E G E . Captain for 1892 , J. M. Quinton . Resultsof M a t c h e s. Matches Played , 11 ; Won, 1 ; Drawn, 5 ; Lost, 5. Opponents. MatchW o n(1). O l dCheltonians ExeterCollege E a s tGloucestershire W h e r eplayed. W h e n played. Club. Opnts. 1st 2 n d 1st.)2 n d i n n, i n n, i n n inn. W o nb y Cheltenham June24, 25 235 *9 194 48 10wkts; *n ow d MatchesD r a w n(5) . R e m a r k s . Cheltenham M a y21 *2 1 9 +295 *9 wd E . G . G r o u n d 2 4 *1 3 3 1 5 9 *8w d " C h e l t e n h a m 3 1 *1 0 1 1 3 3 *9w d Cheltenham June10,11 233*130 351 *4wd Cheltenham July 2 Cheltenham M a y27, 28 186 144 268 C h e l t e n h a mJ u n e4 Clifton *63 *2 1 0 233 M A R L B O R O U G H C O L L E G E M.C.C.a n dG r o u n d. Cheltenham July 8, 9 Lord's 2 9,3 0 104 176 226 *55 Lostb y 9 wkts; *1 w d 9 0 runs; *7 w d 214 runs 7 wkts; *3 w d inns& 9 0 r u n s " CliftonClub Liverpool Club R.A.C.Cirencester MatchesLost (5). Incogniti Oriel College .. C L I F T O NC O L L E G E و د و و 1 2 0 17, 18 107 94 182 + Innings declared . B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S . T i m e s M o s tin I n n s. n o tout. R u n s. a nI n n s. Average. C. Champain 1 7 2 5 9 4 *170 4 1 . 5 J. M. Quinton 1 7 3 3 9 5 *6 0 2 8 . 3 F. Champain 1 7 1 3 1 0 6 6 1 9 . 3 H . J. Tucker 1 6 3 2 4 6 + 3 8 1 8 . 2 J. W .Stratton 1 6 3 1 7 5 *3 5 1 5 B. H. Bignell .. 1 7 0 2 4 4 5 8 14.6 C. L. K. Campbell. 6 0 8 5 2 7 1 4 . 1 E. H. B. Stanley 1 7 0 2 2 5 4 2 1 3 . 2 E. L. Cooke-Collis 9 3 6 2 2 6 1 0 . 2 F. H .Barker 1 1 1 8 7 3 4 8.7 A .L. Lister 1 2 5 3 3 1 1 4 . 5 N obowlinganalysis wasobtainable . C H E L T E N H A ME L E V E NIN 1892.-J. M. Quinton : A n excellent captain; worked the team well on and off the field ; a hard-hitting batsman, with stubborn defence ; muchless successful as a bowler ; sacrifice accuracy for pace ; energetic field . C. E. Bateman- Champain: A fine outfielder ; met with great success as a batsman except in the school matches ; hits well round the wicket , being especially strong in cutting . C. L. K. Campbell : A steady batsmanwith sure defence ; should attempt to develop some scoring strokes ; a very fair field . F. H. Bateman- Champain : Started the season better than he ended; should have a great future before him, as he is very young, and is even nowa good batsman; is too often caught in the slips ; a very fair point , and slow bowler. B. H. Bignell : A good and stylish batsman, hits well to leg ; still short in his forward reach ; a good and active field . J. W. Stratton : Improved morethan any one during the season ; a steady slow bowler, and very fair bats- m a nwith good forward play; should be a very useful all-round player next year. E. H. B. Stanley : A fair batsman; can hit a bit , but lacks defence ; improved greatly as a field . A. L. Lister : Avery plucky wicket -keeper , stands up to the fastest bowling ; takes slow bowling neatly and well ; a poor bat. H. J. Tucker : A straight fast bowler, with a beautiful action , not very difficult ; fair bat, did well several times at critical moments. F. H. Barker : Fast bowler withsuspicious action ; a slogging batsman; worked very hard to improve him- self . E. L. Cooke- Collis : Steady batsman and fair wicket-keeper ; fields well .