James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1893

1 5 0 LILLYWHITE'SCRICKETERS' A N N U A L. bowler . H. G. Rivington : W o nhis place by excellent fielding ; fair bowler ; if he could restrain his inclination to hit ought to be a useful bat. P. B. Allen : Witha good style and great perseverance ought to have met with more success ; poor in the field , but made a fair wicket -keeper . H. V. Gwynne : Very slow to score and usually sent back too soon ; slack and slow in the field . H. J. Tiffen : A ttimes plays well, but has not metwith success ; an earnest but not always satisfactory field. B R A D F I E L D C O L E G E . Captain for 1892 , H. S. Burnell . Resultso fM a t c h e s. Matches Played, 8 ; D r a w n, 1 ; Lost, 7. Club. Opnts. 1st 2 n d1 s t2 n d played . inn. inn. inn. inn. R e m a r k s . Opponents. W h e r eplayed. W h e n MatchD r a w n(1). S. C. R . Bradfield July 7 *116 2 5 6 *5 wd MatchesLost (7). Lostb y W .H. P. Stevens' X I. , Bradfield M a y1 6 1 4 1*107 142 1 run; *6 w d MagdalenCollege , Oxford Bradfield 2 4 4 6 1 4 22 3 177runs; *8 w d OldWykehamists B r a d f i e l d ود وو 2 8 7 9 131 *86 52runs; *8wd Reading Bradfield J u n e4 8 2 111*115 29 runs; *3 wd O l dB o y s B r a d f i e l d 6 وو 6 3114 169 *10 8wkts; *2 w d M.C.C.a n dG r o u n d Bradfield July 2 4 3 *4 7 0 427runs; *7 wd BathCollege B a t h 2 5 ود 8 239 5 2*70 6 wkts; *4w d B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S . T i r a e s M o s tin I n n s. n o tout. R u n s. a nInns. Average. H .S. Burnell 1 2 2 1 7 5 *5 2 1 7 . 5 F. T. A n d e r s o n 1 2 0 2 0 6 4 6 1 7 . 2 H .McIlquham 1 2 4 9 3 2 8 1 1 . 5 G .D .D a h s e 1 2 1 1 1 4 3 8 1 0 . 3 W .E, M. Tyndall. 7 0 6 9 2 6 9 . 8 G. H. Hewitson.. 6 3 1 9 1 3 6 . 3 A .H i n d e 1 0 0 5 8 1 4 5 . 8 L. W .Reynolds... 4 0 2 0 1 8 5 . 0 G .D .Veitch 9 0 4 4 1 4 4 . 9 O. D.A t k i n s o n 8 1 3 0 2 3 4 . 2 C. W, Lydall 7 0 3 0 2 4 4 . 2 W .O. Cautley 4 H .E.Haig 5 R. C. Page 7 0 1 0 8 6 2 . 0 6 3 1 . 2 1 0 4 1 . 1 T. A. Bathurst , 0 -*0-03; E. O. Cumming, 1-1-03; W. C. H. Smallpiece , 3 -*7 ; E. L. Paine, *13. B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . Overs. Maidens. R u n s, Wickets. Average. L. W .Reynolds 22.1 5 4 4 6 7.3 W .O. Cautley. 4 0 . 4 1 1 1 1 9 1 2 9 . 9 A .H i n d e 1 5 7 . 4 3 3 4 3 5 2 6 16.7 H .S. Burnell 109.1 1 4 3 8 7 1 8 21,5 G.D.Dahse.. 106.4 1 5 3 6 7 1 7 21.6 O. D. Atkinson 1 2 3 4 3 3 1 4 . 3 G. H .H e w i t s o n 3 9 7 1 3 2 5 2 6 , 2 E. O. C u m m i n g... 2 0 4 4 4 2 2 2 E. M . Tyndall. The following also bowled :- H. McIlquham; W. C. H. Smallpiece ; C. W. Lydall ; W. BRADFIELDELEVENIN 1892. -*H. S. Burnell : Asteady improving bat, with good style ; under happier auspices would have scored freely ; an excellent cap- tain , but has fallen on evil days , whencricket has had to take a very bad fourth place to examinations , measles , and the Agamemnon. *L. W. Reynolds : Has been seen very little in the cricket field ; bowled excellently in the FormMatches ,