James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1893

1 2 0 LILLYWHITE'SCRICKETERS' ANNUAL. port's bowling . Their best performers with the bat were Hill (44 and 17 ) and Jephson (40 and 1). The necessary runs were hit off by the Yorkshiremen in two hours for the loss of three wickets , thanks to 47 by Hall , 40 by Lord Hawke, and 31 by Ulyett . Yorkshire , 154 and 136 (three wickets ) ; total , 290. CambridgeUniversity , 188 and 100 ; total , 288 . (3) Yorkshirev. Derbyshire. Leeds , M a y30 and 31 . Though not scoring very heavily themselves , the Yorkshiremen proved good enough for Derbyshire in a single innings . Bagshaw alone played the right gametwice for the latter , whowere defeated by no less than an innings and 43 runs . The ground rendered the bowlers very considerable assistance . York- shire , 162. Derbyshire , 73 and 46; total , 119. " Hirst (1st innings Derbyshire ) Peel(2nd O v e r s. 1 3 2 0 . 3 M a i d e n s. 8 1 6 1 2 7 R u n s. W i c k e t s. 5 5 (5) Yorkshirev. Leicestershire. Leicester , June 9, 10, and 11 . After a certain point , Leicestershire played a remarkably good game; but althoughsix of their batsmengot doublefigures , matters hadgonetoo far. O n thewinning side , who were without Lord Hawke, Hall (60) and Moorhouse(56) showed the best cricket . Peel's bowling proved singularly effective in each innings . Heavyrain had madethe wicket easy when Yorkshire went in to knock off the required runs, and they wonby eight wickets . Yorkshire , 237 and102 (two wickets ) ; total , 339. Leicestershire , 122 and 216 ; total , 338 . Peel(Yorkshire) Overs. 6 6 . 4 Maidens. R u n s. Wickets. 1 1 7 1 1 2 6 (6) Y o r k s h i r ev. D u r h a m . Halifax, July 1 and 2. Quite a second -rate eleven did duty for Yorkshire , yet the result was never in doubt. Wardall (44), Wainwright (44), R. W. Frank, freely . On the side of Durham, F. Butler , formerly of Notts , played a very fine second innings of 77. Yorkshire wonby seven wickets . Durham, 123 and 148; total , 271. Yorkshire , 243 and29 ; total , 272. (7) Y o r k s h i r ev. Staffordshire. Hull, July 4 and 5. Yorkshire's huge total of 516 was rendered more noteworthy by the fact that three of the elevendidnotsubscribea r u n. T h eotherm e m b e r sm a d eso light of the Stafford attack that even after R. W . Frankhad made 163 by tre- mendoushitting , Ulyett 57, and Mounsey54, Wardall, whofailed by one runto reach the " century ," and Hunter (83) added no less than 153 runs for the tenth wicket. Under such disheartening auspices , small wonder that the visiting eleven failed conspicuously with the bat, and were soundly beaten by an innings and 285 runs . Yorkshire , 516. Staffordshire , 74 and 157 ; total , 231 . (8) Y o r k s h i r ev. Leicestershire. Bradford , July 7, 8, and 9. For their colossal total of 509 -two innings of over 500 within a week, by