James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1893

8 6 LILLYWHITE'SCRICKETERS' ANNUAL. Opponents . Resultsof M a t c h e s. Matches Played , 16 ; Won, 7 ; Drawn, 4 ; Lost , 5. (1) Sussex *K e n t *Gloucestershire (7) Yorkshire (8) Somersetshire (9) Sussex (1 1) Notts MatchesD r a w n(4). *K e n t (4) Surrey (5)Middlesex *Gloucestershire MatchesLost (5). W h e r eplayed. W h e n played. Club. Opnts. 1 s t 2 n d 1st 2 n W o nb y i n n. i n n. i n n. i n n. MatchesW o n(7) . M a n c h e s t e r M a y19, 20 55 206 72 77 112 runs Tonbridge July 11, 12, 13 484 97 57 inns &330runs Liverpool 2 8, 29 3 1 1 1 4 2 139 inns& 30runs Manchester Aug. 1, 2, 3 4 7 1 209 179 inns & 83 runs M a n c h e s t e r 8 , 9 " 116 *32 88 58 8wkts ; *2w d Brighton 1 5,1 6 3 5 6 105 126 inns & 125 runs M a n c h e s t e r و د ود 25, 26, 27 277 158 50 inns & 69 runs R e m a r k s . Manchester June9, 10 2 6 0 127*257 *6 w d M a n c h e s t e r و د 23, 24, 25 +246 *8 +8 w d; *no w d Manchester July 14, 15, 16 92 243 109 *112 *9 w d Clifton Aug. 11, 12, 13 69 +287 105 *50 +7 w d; *4 w d Lostby Sheffield June6, 7 118 101 159 *63 4 wkts ; *6 w d 16,1 7, 18 July 18, 19, 20 Aug. 18, 19, 20 2 2, 23 و د 217 182 178 *222 6 wkts ; *4 w d 48 153 72 *130 156 97 214 *40 99 197 229 *71 4 wkts ; *6 w d 9 wkts ; *1 w d 7wkts ; *3 w d W o nby N a n t w i c h M a y16, 17 2 0 5 105 66 inns & 34 runs Manchester June 3,4 1 7 2 89 56 inns & 27 runs M a n c h e s t e r 2 0, 21 2 5 4 1 2 0 112 inns& 22runs Birmingham و د و و 2 7, 28 3 5 7 130 122 inns & 105 runs Manchester July 4, 5 1 7 7 48 120 inns & 9 runs MatchD r a w n(1) . R e m a r k s. N o r t o n ود 8 , 9 3 1 2 187*115 *4 w d Lostby Lord's Oxford M a y9,10 155 110 238 *29 10wkts; *n o w d ود 2 6,27 8 8 142 132 105 7 runs + Inningsdeclared. (2) Yorkshire.... (3) Notts (6) Somersetshire *Middlesex.. (10) Surrey E x t r aMatches . MatchesW o n(5). (1 2) Cheshire..... (14) Warwickshire (15) Oxford University (16) Warwickshire (1 7) Cheshire.... (18) Durham.. MatchesLost (2). *M . C . C. a n dG r o u n d (13) OxfordUniversity Nottingham T a u n t o n Lord's O v a l " * See reviews of Gloucestershire , Kent, and Middlesex . (1) Lancashirev. Sussex. Manchester , M a y19 and 20. Amatch of brief duration , the consequence of a wicket affected by a heavy rainfall . The game, indeed , was so far advanced on the first day that twenty- three wickets fell . Though they were placed at a serious disadvantage in losing the toss , Sussex , thanks to a freely -hit score of 33 by Guttridge , whose first appearance it was for the county, were able to get a lead of 17 runs on the first innings . W h e nLancashire wentin a second time, however, Sugg (43) and A. Ward(54) hit out with great resolution , and by the end of the day Lancashire had gained a considerable advantage, being 114 on with only three batsmen out. Rain prevented a renewal until past three o'clock on the second afternoon , and then the bowlers were so muchin evidence that the remaining seventeen wickets were secured for an aggregate of 152 runs . Sussex hada hopeless task whenthey went in for the fourth innings with 196 to win. Before the ball began to bite , Bean and Marlow, the first batsmen, put on 33, but, subsequently , Watson and Mold carried everything before them, and the side wereall outfor 77. Marlow asin over anhouranda half for 18. Lancashire