James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1892

66 LILLYWHITE'SCRICKETERS' ANNUAL. R e s u l t sof M a t c h e s. Matches Played , 14 ; Won, 5 ; Drawn, 5; Lost, 4 . Opponents. (2) Yorkshire ... *Lancashire (3) Sussex W h e r eplayed. W h e n played. Club. Opnts. 1st 2 n d1 s t 2 n d i n n. i n n. inn. inn. W o nb y MatchesW o n(5). Nottingham Ju11,12,13 336 148 163 inns & 25 runs Nottingham ,, 25,26,27 188 *123 155 155 7 wkts ; *3 w d Brighton Jy 9,10,11 301 +340 246 251 144 runs Sheffield ,, 13,14,15 292 110 106 inns& 7 6 runs Nottingham ,, 16,17,18 264*112 332 38 3 wkts; *7 w d R e m a r k s. Tonbridge Jy23,24,25 346 *65 382+120 *3 w d Manchester Au13,14,15 145 1 7 2 R a i n Nottingham ,, 21,22,23 418 *1 1 4 *6wd Clifton Nottingham ,, 24,25,26 205 *7 3 *5 wd ,, 27,28,29 84 *22 97 *2w d (4) Yorkshire. (5) Sussex MatchesD r a w n(5). *K e n t *Lancashire *K e n t **Gloucestershire *M i d d l e s e x . MatchesLost(4). (1) Surrey *M i d d l e s e x *Gloucestershire (6) Surrey ExtraMatches(3) . (7) Derbyshire (8) Derbyshire *M . C . C. a n dG r o u n d * Seeprevious reviews. Nottingham My18,19,20 147 217 250 *115 Lord's June8,9 196 84 96 233 Nottingham July 30, 31 78 94 294 Oval Aug.3, 4 8 6 4 4 1.76 Nottingham May7, 8,9 1364 *32 213 182 Derby Ju15,16,17 234 *89 138 181 Lord's ,, 1 2 1 69 127 (1) Nottsv. Surrey. Nottingham, M a y18, 19, and 20. Lostb y 5 wkts ; *5 w d 49 runs inns& 122runs inns& 46runs W o nby 10 wkts ; *n o wd 7 wkts; *3 w d Lost byinns&37runs + Inningsdeclared. If Barnes was unable to assist Notts , Surrey were still more unfortunate in being without either of the Cantabs , Messrs . Streatfield , Wells, and Douglas , as well as Lockwood, who had such a severe cold that Bowleyfilled his place . They, however, wonthe toss , whenAbel (103) and Mr. Key(59) gave a splendid exhibition of batting , adding 106 while together . The little professional gave but one chance-a difficult one, at 70 ; moreover, he followed this up by a second innings of 63 (not out) thus scoring 166 for once out . Indeed, his batting and Lohmann'sgood bowling fairly wonSurrey the match. Themost reputable of the Notts batsmen failed the first time, andthey had to follow on, whenGunn, who had the misfortune to be run out , played grandly for 59. But the feature of the Nottinghambatting was Mr. J. A. Dixon's two innings of 73 and 62. Surrey w o nby five wickets . Surrey, 250 and 115 (five wickets ) ; total , 365. Notts , 147and217; total , 364. (2) N o t t sv. Y o r k s h i r e. Nottingham , June 11, 12, and 13. Yorkshire were not in full strength without Lord Hawke, Moorhouse, and Whitehead, whose places were filled by Mr. A. Sellars , and by two most promising youngsters ,Wardall of Bacup, and Tunnicliffe of Pudsey. Notts ' one effort proved sufficient without going in again . Nine of the side got into double figures , though Barnes ' 104 andGunn's 58were the features of the display . The veteran Barnes gave no actual chance , and a sum of £11 10s . was collected for himin the pavilion . This was Notts' first victory of the season-by an innings and25 runs . Notts , 336. Yorkshire , 148 and 163; total , 311 .