James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1892

T H EM A R Y L E B O N EC L U BI N 1801. 4 5 H A R R O W . First Innings. SecondInnings. Overs. M a n s. R u n s. W k t s. O v e r s. M d n s. R u n s. W k t s. F o r b e s 2 8 9 5 9 2 23.1 9 4 1 Arkwright 3 1 1 0 7 8 2 1 0 5 1 3 L a n e-F o x 1 7 9 2 7 2 1 0 4 1 2 2 0 1 0 H o a r e 1 0 3 3 5 2 3 3 0 0 Crabtree 8 2 2 5 2 S t u d d 2 0 1 0 0 F o r b e sb o w l e dfive n o-balls. (11 ) B a rv. A r m y. July 13 and 14 . Theresult wasan easy victory for the " meno' law," whoran up the huge total of 393. Mr. F. E. Lacey, whowas run out after getting 163, and Mr. J. A. Turner (80) added 169 while in together . In addition , Mr. Turner took thirteen wickets for 120 runs . TheBarw o nby aninnings and 115 runs . Bar, 395. Army, 143 and 137 ; total , 280. (12) Rugbyv. Marlborough. July29. Anotherof the manymatches completely spoiled by rain last season . N o playat all took place on the second day, and only a little on the first . The matchwasdrawn. Rugby, 36 (two wickets ). Marlborough did not bat. (13) M i d d l e s e xv. S u s s e x. Aug. 13 and 14 . B ysingularly uneven cricket , Mr. N e w h a m(56) and Jesse Hide (30) were responsible for no fewer than 86 of the small first total of 130 by Sussex . Messrs . Stoddart (90) and O'Brien (44) scored so freely when Middlesex went in as to put on 118 for the first wicket . The former scored at a tremendous pace , as maybe judged from the fact that he was under two hours at the wickets . Thoughthe rest did comparatively little , a good total of 216 was reached . On the second day Sussex played up rather better , and Bean's 68 was the outcome of soundcricket . T h e ywere, however, beatenb y eight wickets. Middlesex had not previously played Sussex for over twenty years . Middlesex , 216 and 78 (two wickets ) ; total , 294. Sussex , 130 and 162 ; total , 292 . (14) Middlesexv. Surrey. A u g .17 and18. B yfar the best performance credited to the Middlesex Eleven during the summer. Winning the toss , they remained in nearly the whole of the first day, running up a total of 259 , which included seven double figures . Messrs . Stod- dart and O'Brien scored 80 for the first wicket , and afterwards Mr. Hadow(52) m a d ematters lively for the fielding side . Surrey had responded with 86 for three m e non the first evening . During the night , however, the conditions changedentirely , rain fell heavily , and whenSurrey went in to make the 82 required to save an innings defeat , the sun was shining brightly , so that the wicket was quite unplayable . Only Lohmann(40 and 25) batted well each time, and Surrey had to put up with a defeat by an innings and 20 runs. Middlesex , 259. Surrey , 177 and62 ; total , 239. T H EF O L L O W I N GP R O F E S S I O N A LB O W L E R SW E R E N G A G E DA T L O R D ' SIN 1891 :-ThomasHearne , Farrands , Clayton , Rylott , Wild, William Mycroft , G. G. Hearne, Wheeler , Sherwin , T. Mycroft , W. Hearn , Flowers , Price , Barnes , Gunn, Scotton , Hay, Fothergill , Attewell , Parnham, Burton , Pickett , Wootton , Davenport , Pentecost , Titchmarsh , Chatterton , J. E. West, Martin , Pougher , Rawlin, A. Hearne, Carlin , Davidson, W. J. B. West, Phillips , Shacklock, Richardson , Whitehead , Whiteside , Burns , Bean, Moorhouse , Needham, and J. T .H e a r n e.