James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1892

1 5 8 LILLYWHITE'SCRICKETERS' A N N U A L. in the field , with a quick return; has left for Charterhouse. J. Norwood: Kept wicket very well indeed ; but his batting is of that order which dares muchbut accomplishes little ; has left for Rugby. A. H. Johnston : Agood and improving bat, hits hard and clean all round, butoften a little too anxious to score ; sharp and quick in the field ; fair bowler . E. M. Toul- min: A steady and powerful left -handbat; good mediumleft -handbowler , with a puzzling break; a little slow in the field ; probably leaving for Marlborough . R. P. Hills : A very steady and useful little bat, and with more power will probably develop his run-getting powers; a capital point , has brought off some brilliant catches ; has left for Marlborough . B. Morgan: Hasbatting in him, but wants more nerve , must cultivate forward play on the off stump; very good field , sure catch ; good mediumbowler . A. J. Littleton : Hasimproved as a bat, but still requires nerve for forward play ; slow in the field ; occasionally effective as a bowler, though rather erratic ; has left for Rugby. G. Shewell : Will probably develop into an extraordinary good bat; has capital defence , but requires strength to punish ; good field . A. T. Atkinson : Hits hard and often , but should cultivate defence ; fair bowler ; capital hard- working field ; has left for Rugby. H. G. Davies : Hasnot quite comeup to expectations ,but will undoubtedlyimprove; goodfield . A. T. Blackwood: At present rather uncertain as a batsman, but with several good strokes ; will probably come on next season ; too slow and unsafein thefield. B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . E .M . T o u l m i n B.Morgan A. T. Atkinson A. H. Johnston.. A .Littleton O v e r s. M a i d e n s. R u n s. Wickets. Average. 5 2 1 8 6 0 1 9 3 . 3 7 8 2 5 1 0 4 2 1 4.20 6 0 1 0 2 5 2 3 6 4 1 5 8 . 1 8 1 2 3 1 2 3 TheKing's School, Bruton.-Matches played , 13; won, 6; drawn , 2 ; lost , 5. B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S , T i m e s M o s tin I n n s. n o tout. R u n s. a nInns Average. F.G r a h a m. 1 4 2 4 7 8 1 0 4 39.10 D .E. N o r t o n 1 4 2 4 6 1 *1 0 7 37.7 E .M .T w e e d 1 3 1 2 8 8 8 2 2 4 G .L.Davies 1 1 0 5 8 2 1 5 . 8 W .M .Everall 1 3 1 4 9 1 0 4 . 1 P. H. Compton 1 3 0 4 1 1 0 3 . 2 P.A. Bennett 4 0 1 4 7 3.2 R .W o o d f o r d e... 1 3 2 3 3 *1 1 3 L. W .N o r t o n.. 6 2 1 0 6 2.2 H .F.Everall 4 1 7 2 2.1 E.E. Knollys 1 3 0 2 5 8 1.12 N .E . T o d 3 0 5 3 1 . 2 N .F. T r o t m a n 1 0 1 8 4 . 8 R .Cator 7 1 2 2 .2 B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S Overs. M a i d e n s. R u n s. W i c k e Average. E. M . T w e e d 8 4 . 3 2 3 1 4 3 2 9 4.27 L. W .N o r t o n. 10.1 2 2 1 4 5.1 N .F. T r o t m a n 4 2 9 1 9 R. W o o d f o r d e. 200.4 4 5 4 4 8 4 7 9.25 J. F. G r a h a m 187.1 3 0 5 2 2 4 5 11.27 R . Cator 79.1 6 2 9 3 2 3 12.17 P. H. Compton 4 8 . 1 6 1 5 7 8 19.25 G .L.Davies 3 7 5 1 1 8 5 23.3