James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1892

T H EUNIVERSITIESA N DP U B L I CSCHOOLSIN 1891. 1 3 7 B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S . H .D. G. Leveson-Gower I n n s. 1 4 T i m e s. n o tout. 2 R u n s. M o s tin a nI n n s. 5 1 2 *1 0 6 Average.. 4 2 . 6 H o n. E. S. Scott.... 1 0 В а д и 209 *6 3 4 1 . 8 C.W i g r a m 1 3 2 3 3 7 *8 7 3 0 . 6 W .S. C a s e 1 6 3 8 1 6 8 2 3 . 8 R .L. Ricketts 1 1 3 1 6 9 4 7 2 1 . 1 L. W . S. Rostron. 1 3 2 0 2 *4 1 1 6 . 8: J. R .M a s o n 1 3 4 1 5 0 *35 16.6 G .W .Jackson . 1 3 1 0 1 4 6 3 2 1 1 . 2 L. O. Micklem 1 6 2 1 5 3 2 5 1 0 . 9 H . J. W i g r a m 7 4 2 0 *1 1 6 . 6% R .P.Lewis 9 1 2 6 1 1 3 . 2 R. C. Lane (12th man) 1 3 1 1 7 6 6 2 1 4 . 6. C.W i g r a m J.R .M a s o n H .D .G . Leveson-G o w e r H . J. W i g r a m H o n, E, S. Scott W .S. Case... E .R .M o r r e s. L, O. Micklem Balls. B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . Maidens. R u n s. Wickets. Average. 1 8 9 3 7 6 6 1 7 3 8 1 6 . 2 1 4 7 1 7 7 6 0 1 4 5 1 4 . 2: 1 2 0 3 7 2 5 1 4 . 4 5 5 8 2 1 2 6 8 1 8 14.9 1 4 6 6 1 0 5 6 17.5. 4 7 0 1 7 2 2 4 1 1 20.3 3 5 0 2 3 1 6 4 6 27.3 1 1 5 7 4 4 1 4 4 R. P. Lewis also bowled 2 0 - 1 - 1 6 - 2 . WINCHESTER ELEVEN IN 1891.-C. Wigram (Captain ) : Has no reason to complain of the success of the eleven during his captaincy ; he improved very m u c hin his batting , and could , and often did, play a good hard-hit innings ; his: bowling, however, hardly developed as muchas was hoped; a good field , and mostuseful m a non anyside . H. D. G. Leveson - Gower: Agood field at cover- point , making occasionally surprising mistakes ; he was the best bat in the eleven, playing with good judgmentand in really good style . J. R. Mason: A. medium-pace bowler , improved very much, and has had a successful season ; can playa good innings whenthe bowling is not too fast . * W. S. Case : Apains- taking, careful bat, and did well for his side during the season ; a safe catch , and goodfield ; canbowl slow left -hand, and was a useful change bowler. *R. L. Ricketts : A fair bat on the whole, but is particularly dangerous against fast bowling on a fast wicket ; an extremely good short -slip . L. O. Micklem : W a s quite out of form at the beginning of the year, but played some capital innings towards the end of the season ; a good point . G. W. Jackson : Can hit hard , and ought to be a good bat , but he lost his wicket frequently by trying to hit a straight ball round to leg ; a good m a nin the deep-field , though somewhat variable . *Hon. E. S. Scott : A really good school bat, as his average shows, with plenty of nerve and confidence ; as a rule was a goodfield . R. P. Lewis : Keptwicket very well during the season , and we hope to see him develop into a thoroughly first -class wicket -keeper ; he can hit very hard whenhe chooses , and hewill nodoubtm a k ea lot of runs next season. *L. W . S. Rostron : Amostuse- ful m a nto send in first , as he is patient and has a good defence ; his fielding has improved. H. J. Wigram: A useful , though not very difficult , change bowler ; w ethink he has some batting in him, and hope to see more of it next year. E. R. Morres : Proved himself a most useful manat a pinch , as bowler , field , and bat,