James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1891

T H EUNIVERSITIESA N D PUBLIC SCHOOLSIN 1890. 1 3 7 Apowerful bat; a good change bowler ; a useful m a nin the field . P. H. Morrison : Adangerous bat, with great hitting powers ; has been of the utmost value to the team; a fair field . E. C. Pochin : A very good bat, always playing good cricket ; his cutting is excellent ; a moderate field . E. Mayfield : Asteady bat, withgreat patience ; a safe field . H. Oxley : Gavepromise at the beginning of the season as a bowler , but has gone off ; a poor bat . A. J. Daniell : Has bowled well this season ; as a bat has improved ; a lazy field . C. E. Donne : Auseful bowler , keeping a good length ; a moderate bat , and indifferent field . M. H. Stanbrough : A fair bat, and useful change bowler ; a splendid field , with an excellent return . L. Tubbs : Has scored consistently throughout the season ; a poor field . G. E. Fuhrken : Auseful change bowler ; at times a vigorous bat ; aw e a kfield. J E S U SC O L L E G E , C A M B R I D G E . Matches Played , 14 ; Won, 13 ; Drawn, 1. B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S . T i m e s M o s tin I n n s. n o to u t. R u n s. a nI n n s. Average. G .M c G r e g o r 8 2 3 2 9 1 4 2 5 4 . 5 W .J. Rowell 7 2 2 5 9 8 4 5 1 . 4 A.G. Henfrey 1 0 2 3 4 6 9 4 4 3 . 2 A . H . H o s s a c k 6 3 1 0 8 *3 3 3 6 N. C. Cooper 1 5 1 4 1 0 1 1 3 2 9 . 4 A. G. S t u b b s 1 3 2 3 0 5 5 4 2 7 . 8 S. M .J. W o o d s 7 1 1 6 6 *6 5 27.4 W .M .Scott 1 2 0 2 7 8 1 1 9 2 3 . 2 A . J. L. Hill 6 0 1 3 4 5 0 22.2 R .O. C r a w f o r d 1 4 0 2 5 6 5 6 18.4 H .M e n z i e s 1 1 1 1 3 2 4 6 1 3 . 2 A .H .H o s s a c k A. J. L. Hill W .M .Scott S. M .J. W o o d s. P. A. Fryerplayed11 innings, withanaverage of 40. B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . O v e r s. R u n s. Wickets. Average. 2 1 0 3 0 7 3 6 8.19 1 5 1 2 8 6 2 8 1 0 . 6 2 1 2 3 8 7 3 3 11.24 1 1 8 2 7 9 1 9 14.13 L.Daletook 26 wickets for anaverage of 11.25. JESUS ELEVEN IN 1890.-G. McGregor (Captain ) : Needs no praise , although mention must be made of his grand wicket -keeping , run-getting , and good generalship . W. J. Rowell : Batted even better than last year, and wasnot so slack in the field . A. G. Henfrey : Again scored well, and fielded at times most brilliantly . N. C. Cooper : Succeeded in keeping up his Brighton College reputa- tion; his style is good, reminding one of T o mHaywardof days goneby. A. G.Stubbs : Although batting in a style all his own, made a lot of runs . S. M. J. Woods : Played very little for his College , being captain of the 'Varsity , and also owing to having injured himself in the match against the Magpies . W. М. Scott : Wasnot quite in such good form as anticipated , but succeeded in getting runs whenreally wanted. A. J. L. Hill : Asterling cricketer . R. O. Crawford : Oneof the best leg -hitters in the College for years , had a lot of bad luck , and seemed to want practice . H. Menzies : Kept wicket well when his captain was absent , and also batted well , but still lacks confidence . The bowling was shared bya few ; but mention must be made of Mr. Dale , although not in the eleven , as being a very painstaking all -round cricketer .