James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1891

1 1 6 LILLYWHITE'SCRICKETERS' ANNUAL. would scarcely have saved the follow on. On going in the second time Hants again hit away in fine style , though it was principally owing to Captain Wyn- yard's splendid not out innings of 114 that they were enabled to declare the innings closed whenonly half their wickets had fallen for 234. Captain Wyn- yard , who scored 154 runs for once out , was seen to great advantage each time . Sussex were placed in the unenviable position of having 291 to get in less than three hours . As it turned out , too , Mr. Newhamalone played Baldwin and Roberts with confidence , and the second score would not have reached 100 but for a stand by the two last men. Hampshire won by 164 runs . Hampshire , 238 and 234 ; total , 472. Sussex, 182 and 126 ; total , 308 . B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S . T i m e s M o s tin I n n s. n o tout. R u n s. a nI n n s. Average. Quaife 2 3 1 5 7 8 *1 5 6 26.27 W .H. Andrews 6 1 1 1 5 4 4 23.00 H i d e(J.) 1 8 0 4 0 2 7 5 22.33 W .N e w h a m 2 4 0 4 0 6 7 1 16.91 C. A. S m i t h 2 4 3 2 9 4 4 0 14.00 B r o w n(T. C.) 1 0 1 1 2 5 3 8 13.88 F. T h o m a s .. 1 0 0 1 3 6 4 3 13.60 B e a n 2 4 0 3 2 4 5 0 13.50 Humphreys 2 4 8 1 8 8 *3 2 11.75 F. C. N e w 6 0 6 3 4 3 10.50 G .L.W i l s o n .. 6 0 5 9 2 9 9 . 8 3 E. J. McCormick 4 0 3 7 1 7 9.25 C. J. M. Godfrey 8 3 4 6 *1 5 9.20 B u t t . 2 3 4 1 1 8 *2 8 6.21 G i b b 1 4 4 4 0 8 4 . 0 0 H i d e(A.) 7 0 2 3 1 0 3.28 Tebay 1 2 0 3 3 9 2.75 Shoubridge 4 0 1 0 1 0 2.50 Thefollowing played less than four completed innings :---Charlwood, 3, 6, 2, and *23; J. Brown, 0 and 5; G. H. Cotterill , 4 and 11 ; W. H. Dudney , 40 and 4; W. O. Holloway , 1 and 10 ; andF. H. Gresson, 5 and7. B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . O v e r s. Maidens. R u n s. Wickets. Average. C. J. M. Godfrey. 6 7 . 2 9 2 4 9 1 1 22.63 Hide(A.) 1 2 6 3 7 2 9 4 1 2 2 4 . 5 0 B e a n 372.3 1 3 3 7 4 5 2 8 26.60 C.A. S m i t h 363.1 1 3 3 725 2 3 31.52 Humphreys 198.1 9 6 5 2 1 9 34.31 Hide(J.) 261.3 8 8 5 6 2 1 6 85.12 G i b b 168.2 5 8 3 3 8 5 67.60 T.C. B r o w n 5 9 1 6 1 4 8 1 143.00 G. L. Wilson , 18-4-55-4; E. J. McCormick , 17-8-27-0; and Shoubridge , 16-1-42- 0,bowled in two innings only ; and J. Brown , 2-0-4-0; W. O. Holloway , 4-1-12-0; Quaife , 14.4-1-34-1; W. Newham, 8.2-16-0; and G. H. Cotterill , 4-7-4-13-0, but once. C. J. M. Godfrey delivered five no-balls andBeanfour . Humphreysbowled a wide. Y O R K S H I R E . OFFICERSFOR 1890.-President and Treasurer, M . J. Ellison . Vice-President, E. T. Atkin . Committee , F. S. Atkin, M. J. Dodworth, J. T. Dobb, J. Chester , R. Wigfull , H. Stratford , C. Stokes , M. J. Ellison , jun. , A. G. Winnill , G. Chester , D. Haigh , J. D. Harrison , J. W. Bannister (Leeds ) , A. C. Sharpe (Huddersfield ), W. H. Shepherd (Bradford ) , H. Hart (Hull), Lord Hawke(York), Jas. Lund (Barnsley ), J. Collier (Halifax), S. Shaw (Dewsbury), J. Harrop (Wakefield ). Secretary , J. B. Wostinholm , 10 , NorfolkR o w, Sheffield . For about a month after the opening of the season , Yorkshire looked like making a bold bid for the County Championship . Gloucestershire , Sussex , Kent, and Middlesex were defeated in succession , and the improved form shown all round by the Yorkshiremen gave rise to muchfavourable criticism . Although