James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1890

T H EUNIVERSITIESA N DPUBLICSCHOOLSIN 1889. 1 4 5 Resultsof M a t c h e s. Continued . W h e n Opponents. Where played . played . Club. Opnts. 1s 2 n d 1st 2 n d i n n. inn. i n n. inn. L o s tb y MatchesLost(7) . TonbridgeT o w n D U L W I C HC O L L E G E Tonbridge D u l w i c h 9 6*4 4 1 7 8 7 2*9 1 161 MarlboroughBlues Tonbridge 1 0 1 1 4 4 82 runs; *5 w d 10wkts; *now d 4 3r u n s B a n dof Brothers Tonbridge 4 3 *6 0 1 4 8 M . C . C . Tonbridge 1 2 5 *2 1 5 B R I G H T O NC O L L E G E Brighton 1 2 7 1 6 0 105runs; *8 w d 2w& 90 r; *8w d 3 3runs B l u eM a n t l e s Tonbridge 1 3 2 *3 3 2 2 w& 200r; *8 w d B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S . T i m e s M o s tin I n n s. notout. R u n s. a ninns. Average. M. O'C. Tandy 1 6 2 3 4 5 8 2 24.6 C. C. H a t t 1 0 1 2 0 7 6 4 2 3 E .E.Bryant 1 5 1 2 6 2 5 6 18.7 R . S. H. Baiss 1 5 1 2 5 1 4 4 1 7 . 9 H .Lovegrove 1 5 0 2 2 5 7 4 1 5 G .E . T i m i n s. 1 5 1 1 9 7 4 9 14.1 S. Kennington 1 4 0 1 6 7 5 1 11.9 E . H . L u c k h a m . 1 4 0 1 3 6 5 0 9.7 G .T. W a t s o n 3 1 1 4 *7 7 S. de C. O'Grady 1 2 4 4 9 *2 6 6.1 J. M. Marshall . 1 3 5 2 6 7 3 . 2 B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . Balls. Maidens. R u n s. Wickets. Average. H .Lovegrove... 3 1 4 1 6 1 7 5 1 2 14.58 E . H . L u c k h a m . 3 9 0 2 6 2 2 3 1 4 15.9 E.E.Bryant 9 5 1 9 6 6 1 6 J. M .Marshall 1 1 7 2 6 5 6 0 0 3 6 16.6 S. de C. O'Grady 1 1 1 4 5 4 5 2 9 2 2 2 4 . 4 M . O'C. Tandy 5 8 1 5 1 2 25.5 S. Kennington 5 0 4 2 8 3 0 3 1 0 3 0 . 3 C.C .H a t t 1 3 5 6 1 1 2 2 5 6 TONBRIDGEELEVENIN 1889.-C. C. Hatt : Bats in a good style , and can hit well ; improved in defence ; was unfortunately away for several matches , when his absence was much felt ; moderate field and bowler . E. E. Bryant : Asteady , useful bat , with good defence , but lacks punishing power ; fair wicket -keep , and slow bowler. M. O'C. Tandy: Improved in style since last year, though still inclined to play back too much; can hit hard on the off -side ; a quick field and sure catch ; captain for 1890. H. Lovegrove : A slow and painstaking bat, often a long time at the wickets for his runs ; quite out of form at the beginning of last season , but improved as the wicket got faster ; fair change bowler, andgood field . R. S. H. Baiss : Bats in a neat style , and shows promise ; has an excellent defence , and when his strength and hitting powers increase should be very useful ; uncertain field . G. E. Timins : Too short -sighted to make a good cricketer , but bats fairly , and can hit well at times ; a first -rate field at point . S. Kennington : A good all -round cricketer , and likely to be very useful next year ; has improved in style and defence ; excellent field , and effective change bowler. J. M. Marshall : Left -hand fast bowler, with a slight break from the off , which he should try to increase ; likely to do well if he does not overbowl himself , and can acquire more commandof pitch ; good field ; poor bat. E. Н. Luckham: Bats in a free style , and can score fast whenset , but has not enough defence ; bowls mediumpace; a fine field , and made some splendid catches . S. de C. O'Grady: Right-hand fast bowler, without any break ; keeps well on the wicket, and bowls a fair length ; should learn to vary both pace and pitch ; bats in a style of his own. G .T. Watson : With practice m a ymakea fair wicket -keep ; moderate bat. 1 1