James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1888

THE UNIVERSITIES AND PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN 1887. 1 4 7 Opponents. R e s u l t so f M a t c h e s .-Continued. Where played . played . Club. Opnts. W h e n 1st 2 n d1st 2 n d inn. inn. inn. inn. Lostb y MatchesLost(4). A . J. W e b b e ' sX I. S o u t hWilts Presentv. Past C L I F T O NC O L L E G E S h e r b o r n e Sherborne M a y30,31 J u n e9 54 133 405 1 2 5 1 5 1 S h e r b o r n e 28,29 153 58 393 Clifton July8,9 65 53 483 inns. & 218runs 2 6runs inns. & 82 runs inns. & 365runs B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S . T i m e s I n n s. n o to u t. R u n s. M o s ti n a nInns. W .ff. Fendall (Capt .) 1 1 0 1 2 1 2 5 Average. 1 1 A. C. Clapin 1 1 0 8 1 2 5 7.4 C. L. H. Chaldecott .. 1 0 1 1 5 3 *5 2 1 7 C.A. C o c h r a n e 1 0 2 2 2 4 *6 3 2 8 G .A .Ellis 1 0 1 8 9 2 5 2 9 0 9 . 8 J. H. Ll. Fenwick. 1 0 1 1 4 4 4 8 . 01 1 6 1 W .H. P. Price 1 1 1 1 9 2 *5 2 1 9 . 2 B.P. Spurway 6 1 4 8 3 8 9 . 3 W . J. Galpin 9 2 5 4 *2 3 07:5 C.L o n s d a l e 8 3 4 4 3 *1 8 8 ./ P. H .Morres 1 0 0 1 3 0 4 2 1 3 B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . O v e r s. M a i d e n s. R u n s. Wickets. Average. W .f f . Fendall 107.1 2 1 3 0 8 1 0 30.8 A.C. Clapin 192.3 3 7 7 0 9 1 8 3 9 . 7 C. L. Chaldecott 166.1 4 5 3 5 1 1 8 19.92.16 C. A. Cochrane 2 9 7 6 2 3 2 0 . 2 0 1 G .A .Ellis. 1 3 4 3 2 3 1 6 1 2 26.4 J. H. Ll. Fenwick 4 8 1 5 1 3 4 4 33.2 B. P. Spurway.... 5 5 0 W .J. Galpin 2 3 3 5 3 3 1 7 . 2 C.Lonsdale 4 7 1 0 1 2 9 3 4 3 P.H .M o r r e s 8 7 1 9 2 7 4 7 39.1 in SHERBORNEELEVENIN 1887 .-* W. ff . Fendall (1885–7 ) : -As Captain has metwith fair success , but was handicapped by want of material to choose from; disappointing as a bat, perhaps on account of his propensity for getting l.b.w .; bowled well at times , and worked energetically in the field . A. C. Clapin (1886-7) : Hardly came up to his last year's form as a slow bowler, owingto the dryness of the season , andthe general inability of the eleven to hold catches ; a poor bat, but a quick field . *C.. L. H. Chaldecott (1885-7 ) : Improved great batting , and played several good innings ; was fairly successful with the ball , butbowledfar too manywides during the season ; a smart field at point . *C. A. Cochrane (1887) : Cameon wonderfully as a bat, and scored consistently through- out the season ; stiff in style , but possesses good hitting powers ; bowled occasionally with success ; not brilliant as a field . G. A. Ellis (1886-7 ) : Adoptedamorecareful style in batting this season ; a very steady bowler, but apt to be sleepy in the field . T. H. Ll. Fenwick (1886-7 ) : Began the season well in batting , but fell off somewhattowards the end; was tried as a wicket- keep, but with little success ; the same remark will apply to his bowling ; a sure catch anywhere. W. H. P. Price (1887) : A very promising bat, cutting especially well ; fielded badly at first , but improved latterly . *B. P. Spurway (1887 ) : Would make a pretty bat , if he could only get out of the way of return- ing short balls to the bowler ; slow in the field . *W. J. Galpin (1887 ) : Has good hitting powers , but tries to maketoo much use of them; was serviceable once or twice as a slow change bowler ; not brilliant in the field . C. Lonsdale (1887 ): Much too fond of hitting good balls , and should learn to play more