James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1887

S A T H ECOUNTIESIN 1 8 8 6 1 . 1 8 3 R e s u l t sof M a t c h e s. Matches Played , 14 ; Won, 5 ; Drawn, 3 ; Lost , 6. Opponents. MatchesW o n(5). *Derbyshire (4) Sussex *Derbyshire (7) Yorkshire... (10) Lancashire. MatchesD r a w n(3). (1) Yorkshire.. (8) Middlesex (1 1)Notts MatchesLost(6). *Middlesex .. (2) Lancashire (3) Notts.... (5) Sussex (6) Surrey W h e n Where played . played . D e r b y Brighton M a i d s t o n e Canterbury M a i d s t o n e Sheffield G r a v e s e n d Nottingham Lord's و د Club. O p n t s. 1st 2 n d1st 2 n d i n n. inn. inn. inn. 319 *213 161 370 4 wkts ; *6 w d 2 1 9 1 0 41 0 2 inns& 1 3 runs 335 *64 172 226 6wkts ; *4 w d 8 9 *74 77 82 W o nby Ju212223 106 258 105 86 173runs July89 10 2 9,3 0 Aug. 5,6,7 2 3, 24 9 wkts; *1 w d R e m a r k s. Ju 141516 Ag.12 1314 196 *374 457 255 *49 218 158 *5 w d *5w d ,,262728 246 104 177 *82 Lostby 43 runs و د June1, 2 83 136 104 158 Manchester 1 71 81 9 M a i d s t o n e Tonbridge B e c k e n h a m *3 wd o 127 201 269 *71 5 wkts; *5 w d 228 113 185 *159 3 wkts ; *7 w d 220 126 238 287 179 runs 248 202 440 *14 10 wkts; *now d و و ,, 242526 Jy151617 2 22324 O v a l A g1920 21 142 125 176 130 39runs ExtraMatches. [*n owd Canterbury Lord's M y 1 01112 *53 2 3 0 D r a w n; *1 w d (9) Surrey (12) Australians *M . C . C . a n dG r o u n d ,, 2,3,4 171 *35 79 123 Wonby 10 wkts ; * Seereviews of M.C.C. andDerbyshire. (1) K e n tυ. Y o r k s h i r e. Sheffield , June 14, 15 , and 16. A ninteresting match, left drawn owing to rain , which prevented more than an hour's play on the opening day. Yorkshire put together 218 runs at their first attempt , the chief scoring being done by Hon. M. B. Hawke(76) and Hall (54). Kent commenced well with 106 for the first wicket , and in the end managed to head their opponents by 37 runs , W. H. Patterson (69), F. Hearne (56) , and J. N. Tonge (40) being the largest contributors . In Yorkshire's second attempt Mr. Hawke(56 not out) was again the chief scorer , his main supporter being Grimshaw, with 43. Kent, who required 122 runs to win, with about an hourand a half to get them in, lost five batsmen for 49 runs in the attempt . Kent, 255 and 49 (five wickets ) ; total , 304. Yorkshire , 218 and 158 ; total , 376 . (2) K e n t v. Lancashire. Manchester , June 17, 18, and 19 . W o nby Lancashire , after an interesting match , with five wickets to spare . Though Mr. A. N. Hornby and Barlow , the first two batsmen of Lancashire , put on 63 before they were separated , five wickets were downfor 80 runs. Briggs , however , came to the rescue , and thanks to his admirable innings of 107 , Lancashiretotalled 269 runs. Kentm a d ea very moderateshow, seven of the eleven only accounting for 18 runs between them. They showed up better in the follow on, though , thanks to some fine batting by Lord Harris (61) and 'George Hearne (56), and the total just topped two hundred . This left Lan- cashire 70 runs to win, a numberwhich cost them five wickets . A. Teggin made a very successful début for Lancashire . In the two innings of Kenthe took 10 wickets for 87 runs . Kent, 137 and 201 ; total , 338. Lancashire , 269 and 71 '(five wickets ) ; total , 340.