James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1886

1 0 0 L I L L Y W H I T E ' SC R I C K E T E R S ' A N N U A L. Hall washardly so successful , Ulyett played consistently well , notwithstanding the disadvantage , in the later fixtures , of asprained ankle , and Bates andGrim- shaw, the latter of w h o mmadea marked advance, were in capital form. F. Lee, however, headed the batting averages , and he had indeed very few superiors among professional batsmen in 1885. In bowling Yorkshire was hardly as dangerous as of old . Ulyett's ankle prevented him from bowling but very little , and Peate, Emmett, and Peel, though the two first -named were very useful , were not as successful . In Preston Yorkshire produced a verypromising youngster , and he ought to be muchabove the average as an all-roundcricketer with a little moreexperience. R e s u l t sof M a t c h e s. Matches Played, 16 ; Won, 7 ; Drawn, 7 ; Lost , 2. W h e n Where played . played . Opponents. Matches Won(7). Lord's Huddersfield *M i d d l e s e x *Derbyshire. *N o t t s *Gloucestershire. *S u r r e y *Lancashire Surrey Matches Drawn(7). *S u s s e x *L a n c a s h i r e *N o t t s *Gloucestershire. *K e n t. *Derbyshire. S u s s e x Club. Opnts. 1st 2nd 1st| 2nd i n n. i n n. i n n. i n n. W o nb y 5wkts; *5 wd 103 53 inns & 6 runs 187 209 inns& 28 r u n s 1 5 3 222 inns& 4 r u n s 188 runs 8wkts; *2w d June4, 5, 6 222*125 231 113 و د NottinghamJuly13,14,15 424 Gioucester Sheffield Huddersfield O v a l B r a d f o r d " ود 8,9,19162 16,17,18 379 20,21,22 154 285 104 147 ,, 23,24,25 301 *148 232 214 A u g27,28,29 268 122 187 202 M a y18,19,20 377 1 0 5 Manchester June18,19,20 158 75 168 138 Sheffield B r a d f o r d Canterbury Aug. 3, 4, 5 138 99 312 ود 3 wkts; *7 w d R e m a r k s. *6 w d ,, 29,30 J y1 269 1 2 2*305 July27,28,29 236 325 287 *170 8 w d *3 wd *4wd D e r b y " Brighton 10,11,12 96 196 223 #54 24,25,26 325 345 368 #5 wd *6w d Matches Lost (2). *K e n t . Sheffield M a y25,26,27 86 81 105 63 8 wkts; *2w d Sheffield A u g17,18,19 201 145 169 226 49runs MatchW o n(1). W o nby MatchesD r a w n(3). M.C.C.andGround Lord's (2) CambridgeUniversity *M . C . C. andG r o u n d J u n e1, 2 " 1 4 8 4 4 9 322 *M i d d l e s e x E x t r aMatches. (1) Cambridge University Cambridge May28,29,30 168 *15 138 6 9 44 10 wkts ; *no wd R e m a r k s 4w d *8wd 165 156 6 w d 15,16,17 159 321 198 Sheffield Scarborough Sept. 7, 8, 9 *Allthese havebeentreated inpreviousreviews. Am a t c hbetweenYorkshireElevenand H o n. M . B. H a w k e ' sT e a mat Horsforth Hall, onAugust13, 14, 15, waswonbythe latter by three wickets . Yorkshire scored 215 and136; Mr. Hawke'sTeam, 150 and 202 for seven wickets . (1) Yorkshire v. CambridgeUniversity. Cambridge, M a y28, 29, and 30 . The Cambridge Eleven were not seen to good advantage in this match, and their batting in particular was very disappointing . Inthe first innings Mr.Bainbridge played brilliant cricket for 63, but eight of the eleven together only made17 runs ; and in the second Messrs . Greatorex and Rock were responsible for 31 of 42 from the bat. The first Yorkshire wicket fell for 77, but after Hall and Ulyett no one got more than 23 runs , and the total only reached 168. Yorkshire wonby nine wickets . Yorkshire, 168 and 15 (one wicket) ; total , 183. Cambridge, 138 and 44; total , 182. ✓Peate(2ndinnings Cambridge) Overs. Maidens. R u n s. Wickets. 3 9 3 0 5 1 2