James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1885

2 2 8 L I L L Y W H I T E ' SC R I C K E T E R S ' A N N U A L . I n n s. T i m e s n o to u t. R u n s. M o s tin a nI n n s. A v e r a g e. Thornton, C. I.. 1 0 0 1 6 5 3 6 1 6 . 5 T o p h a m,H . G. T. 1 6 4 5 9 1 2 4 . 1 1 Townsend, F. 1 6 1 2 1 3 4 4 14.3 Trask, W . 9 0 1 1 8 4 5 1 3 . 1 Turner, J. A. 1 4 1 1 0 9 - *6 3 8 . 5 V e r n o n, G. F. 3 2 1 5 9 2 6 0 1 9 . 3 Vizard, W .Ο. 4 0 6 5 1 . 2 W a l k e r, G. G. 1 8 4 2 3 2 6 6 16.8 W a l k e r, J. G. 1 2 0. 2 5 6 9 2 2 1 . 4 Wallace, Major 4 0 5 7 2 5 1 4 . 1 W a r d e 6 0 4 8 3 2 8 W a t s o n , A... 2 8 6 3 3 7 3 6 1 5 . 7 W e b b e,A. J. 2 2 1 4 7 5 *8 3 2 2 . 1 3 Welman, F. T. 1 3 2 8 9 1 8 8 . 1 W h e e l e r 4 0 4 7 2 2 11.3 Whitby, H. O. 1 3 3 7 3 21- 7 . 3 Whitfeld, H. 2 8 2 5 6 8 8 0 2 1 . 2 2 W h i t t a k e r 7 0 7 9 2 6 1 1 . 2 W i l s o n , C. 1 5 1 3 3 9 7 1 - 2 4 . 3 W i l s o n , L. 6 0 7 0 3 6 1 1 . 4 W i n t e r , C. 1 0 3 3 4 1 7 4 . 6 W o o d, A. H. 9 1 1 3 5 2 6 16.7 W o o d, R. 4 1 3 0 2 2 1 0. W o o d(Surrey) 3 1 1 1 4 1 8 5 2 20.18 W o o d h o u s e, W .H . 5 0 1 0 1 6 2 20.1 W o o d-Sims, W . 1 8 1 2 8 5 4 4 16.13 W o o f, W .A. 3 5 1 3 1 8 8 *2 8 8 . 1 2 W o o t t o n, J. 3 7 8 2 6 2 4 0 9 . 1 Wright, C. W . 2 6 0 3 1 1 6 1 11.25 Wright. L. G. 4 0 1 2 4 3.0 Wright, W . 1 9 7 2 2 6 *5 0 18.10 W y a t t, G. N . 2 1 2 3 8 9 1 1 2 20.18 Y o u n g 1 2 1 1 8 4 *3 5 1 6 . 8 *T H EB O W L E R S . CONSIDERINGthe generally hard wickets , andthe consequent amount of work that fell to them, the bowlers acquitted themselves with credit . Spofforth's figures well deserve a line to themselves , and his record is extraordinary . Attewell last season , byexceptionally good bowling , brought himself quite to the front , and, as will be seen , his summaryis a very good one . Emmetthas rarely been more successful , and his bowling was really wonderful , looking at his long career as a cricketer . Mr. Horner proved of immense service to Surrey ; but the amateurs generally , even those of the highest reputation , were expensive . Alfred Shawdid some excellent performances for Notts , and he has lost little if any of his skill . The doings of the other bowlers will be gathered from the appended list . Surrey introduced a very likely new bowler in the youngest Lohmann, and Kentanother promising colt in A. Hearne, the youngest of the threebrothers. 2 0 0O RM O R EW I C K E T SD U R I N GS E A S O N . Spofforth , F. R.. Overs. Maidens. Runs. Wickets. Average. 1 6 2 5 1 2 . 1 1 6 6 7 2 ... 7 3 2 1 0 0W I C K E T SO RO V E RD U R I N GS E A S O N. 2 1 8 Overs. Maidens. R u n s. Wickets. A v e r a g e. A t t e w e l l 1 1 5 0 6 5 9 1 2 1 7 1 0 1 12.5 B a r l o w 1428.3 6 8 6 1 7 0 3 1 3 0 15.13 B a r r a t t 1 1 6 3 0 4 3 2 2 1 9 9 1 2 1 18.21 E m m e t t . 1031.2 5 5 7 1 2 5 0 1 0 7 11.73 Horner , C. Е. 1 0 0 1 . 3 4 4 0 1 6 0 2 1 0 7 1 4 . 1 0 4 Palmer, G. E. 1 2 8 1 . 3 4 7 5 2 2 0 1 1 3 4 1 6 . 5 7 P e a t e 1575.1 7 7 7 1 8 6 8 1-37 1 3 . 8 7 W o o f 1 3 3 5 . 2 5 9 0 2 1 0 9 1 1 6 1 8 . 2 1 W o o t t o n 1 2 0 1 . 1 4 9 3 1 9 6 3 1 1 8 16.75 *N oone included whohas not bowled 25 overs or taken more than three wickets .