James Lillywhte's Cricketers' Annual 1884

7 4 L I L L Y W H I T E ' SC R I C K E T E R S ' A N N U A L . B A T T I N GA V E R A G E S . T i m e s T o t a l M o s ti n Inns. notout. R u n s. a nI n n s. Average. W .Barnes 2 2 2 6 6 6 1 2 0 33.6 A . Shrewsbury 2 3 1 6 5 6 9 8 29.28 W .Flowers 2 2 1 5 7 9 9 5 28.11 J. Selby 1 4 2 3 2 8 1 0 0 2 7 . 4 W .G u n n. 1 9 1 4 5 5 7 7 2 5 . 5 W . Wright. 2 0 7 2 8 4 *1 2 7 21.11 E .M i l l s 1 4 0 2 5 7 7 4 18.5 A .S h a w 1 9 5 2 2 0 3 4 15.10 W .Scotton 9 9 9 2 5 12.3 A .S m i t h 3 0 3 5 2 6 11.2 C.W .W r i g h t . 1 6 0 1 4 7 3 4 9 . 3 J. A . Dixon 7 0 6 4 2 2 9.1 W .Attewell 1 8 1 1 3 8 2 5 8 . 2 M .S h e r w i n. 1 8 6 7 9 1 8 6 . 3 F .Morley 2 0 7 5 3.1 J. G. Pearson had one innings for one run; F. Shacklock two, andF. Butler three innings without scoring . A .S h a w W .Flowers E .Mills W .B a r n e s W .A tewell W .G u n n.. W .Wright. B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . Overs. Maidens. Runs. Wickets. Averages. 9 5 1 . 2 5 8 1 7 5 1 6 2 12.19 438.3 1 9 5 5 1 7 4 0 12.37 136.3 6 5 1 8 2 1 4 1 3 270.3 1 2 5 3 6 8 2 0 1 8 . 8 330.3 1 8 7 3 2 4 1 7 19.1 133.1 5 6 1 9 7 1 0 1 9 . 7 6 0 4 . 1 2 9 6 8 2 5 4 1 2 0 . 5 Thefollowing bowled in one match only :-Pearson, 13 balls for one runandthree wickets; Morley, 75 overs for 47 runs and three wickets ; Shacklock, 29 overs and oneball for4 8runs andfive wickets. S U R R E Y . OFFICERSFOR 1883.-President , Lord Monson. Vice -President , Earl of Bess- borough. Treasurer . W . Cattley . Committee , J. B. Oakley, F. Bur- bidge, W. Burrup, Dr. Blades , G. Wells, E. B. Jones. M. W . Marshall, W .E. Morrison , C. J. Martyn, R. Roberts , H. Scott . T. Winterflood , H. T. Smith. G. Strachan , Sir R. Hanson, C. A. Stein , C. C. Clarke , D. R. Onslow , M.P. , Major -General Marshall , L. A. Shuter , R. Lydgate , H. С. Clarke , J. Shuter , and W. S. Trollope . Secretary , Charles W. Alcock , Surrey Ground, Kennington Oval, London, S.E. Assistant Secretary , W .W .R e a d. T H Emarkedimprovementin Surrey cricket was one of the most noteworthy features of the County season . Theeleven beganbadly enough in losing their first three matches, but after the 24th of July they did not suffer a defeat , and Surrey hadthe distinction of being the only shire unbeaten in a county matchon its ownground. Thesuccess which attended the eleven was, too, the morenote- worthyfrom the fact that, owing to illness , they were unable to secure the services of Jones, their most reliable bowler. and hence they played throughout underdifficulties . Barratt's bowling had very muchto do with the satisfactory result of the season's programme, and his figures were exceptionally good. The eleven benefited greatly , too, by the opportunities it had of playing together , and, as all the new players tried last season are young, the prospects of the countyare morehopeful than they have been for manyyears . Mr. W. W . Read'sbatting w a sconsistently brilliant , Mr. Roller a n dAbelboth showed markedadvance, and in Henderson, and Messrs. Diver , Key, and Bowdenthe county found four very promising additions to its team.