James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1883

8 6 L I L L Y W H I T E ' SC R I C K E T E R S ' A N N U A L. T i m e s Total M o s t M o s t Inns. not out. Runs. in Inns. in Match. Average. W .C l a r k e 7 4 3 2 *2 0 2 0 1 0 . 2 W .C. W i l k i n s o n 2 0 2 1 1 3 1 3 1 0 . 1 A .W .Ridley 4 0 2 8 1 4 1 4 7 . 0 B u r t o n 1 6 5 6 8 3 4 3 4 6 . 2 CaptainK. Borrowes 7 0 3 9 2 0 2 0 5 . 4 F .H e n r y 2 1 5 *5 5 5 . 0 C.R o b s o n 7 0 3 4 1 5 1 6 4 . 6 J. Robertson 2 3 2 1 *1 6 1 7 3.3 C .M .T u k e 1 0 2 2 5 8 1 3 . 3 P. J. T. Henery. 5 0 8 4 4 1.3 T. C. O'Brien (4), andJ. E. K. Studd (0.15 ) played in only one match. B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . I n n s. Overs. Maidens. R u n s. Wickets. Average. C.T. S t u d d 1 4 5 6 5 . 3 2 3 7 8 3 3 5 8 1 4 . 2 1 B u r t o n 2 1 7 4 4 . 2 3 6 8 8 7 7 5 9 14.51 H e n r y 2 33.0 1 6 5 2 3 17.1 A .F . J. F o r d 5 192.0 7 5 2 8 3 1 6 17.11 I. D . W a l k e r 8 1 4 3 . 0 4 9 2 7 2 1 4 19.6 C l a r k e 6 2 1 8 . 1 1 2 4 2 2 5 9 25.0 A .J. W e b b e 9 8 5 . 0 3 3 1 5 1 6 25.1 T . S. P e a r s o n 4 3 5 . 0 1 0 8 1 3 2 7 . 0 A .W .Ridley 3 3 1 . 0 1 0 5 0 2 2 9 . 1 C.M .T u k e 1 3 2 5 0 . 2 8 8 5 0 5 1 5 33.10 W .C. W i l k i n s o n 3 15.0 4 3 5 1 35.0 J. R o b e r t s o n 7 1 0 1 . 2 4 3 1 7 5 4 4 3 . 3 P. J. T. Henery 2 7 . 0 3 1 1 0 0 . 0 Thefollowing bowled in one innings only :- S. W .Scott (3, 0, 14, 0); E. D. Shaw(5, 1, 13, 0) ; H o n. A. Lyttelton (12, 5, 31, 0) ; and J. E. Studd (3, 2, 3, 0). Pearson and Lyttelton bowledone wide apiece , and Robertson three no-balls . N O T T I N G H A M S H I R E . OFFICERS FOR 1882.-President , Lord Galway, M.P. Vice -President , The Mayor of Nottingham. Trustees , Captain Holden, Mr. W. Wright, and Mr. W. H. C. Oates . Committee , Captain Denison, Messrs . H. Brittle , R. Tolley , R. Daft, M. Mason, J. S. Hutchinson , H. V. Story , Captain Sherbrooke , J. D. Gorse , S Butler , J. Burgess , G. H. Fillingham . Hon. Sec. and Treasurer , Captain Holden. Assistant Secretary , E. Browne, Thurland Steeet , Nottingham. N O T T Scould fairly claim to have an equal right with Lancashire to the highest honours of the county season . Theyhad bad luck at times in more ways thanone, and this m a d etheir record the more meritorious. Owingto an injury to his foot Morley was not quite himself , and in fact , except at the verycommencementof the season , he was never seen at his best . Shrewsbury too wasunable to play in several of the later matches and his batting was much missed. Barnes has rarely played better cricket and despite a severe illness during the winter , was again really at the head of the batting averages . Scotton's batting showed a great improvement, but in some respects the play was disappointing , and Selby, Butler and Gunnwere not in their best form. Alfred Shaw, Morley and Flowers between them took 171 out of 203 wickets . The former at times was as successful as ever, and Flowers was of great use though he fell off rather towards the end of the season . Outof twelve matches Nottswon8, and lost 1.