James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1882

2 4 2 LILLYWHITE'SCRICKETERS' A N N U A L. T i m e s I n n s. n o to u t. R u n s. M o s ti n M o s tin an Inns. a Match. Average. Robertson, J..... 2 3 3 2 6 3 3 0* 4 7 1 3 . 5 Robinson, G. E. 1 0 5 5 9 1 7* 1 7 8 . 3 R o w e, F. C. C 8 0 1 2 7 3 8 3 8 15-7 Russel, J. S. 6 1 8 5 2 4* 3 3 1 7 . 0 R y l o t t 7 0 6 1 4 5 4 5 8 . 5 Roller, W . E. 1 5 1 1 8 5 5 2 5 2 1 3 - 3 R i c h a r d s 4 0 9 8 8 2 . 1 R e a d, M . 2 9 2 5 1 5 8 1* 8 1 1 9 - 2 Rhodes, H. Е. 9 1 5 2 1 7* 2 4 6 . 4 R a w l i n 2 1 2 1 6 2 3 1 3 1 8 . 1 0 R o p e r, E. 3 0 3 6 2 0 2 4 12-0 S h a w, H. 6 2 3 0 1 2* 1 5 7 . 2 Shuker, A. 6 0 1 1 5 4 5 6 0 1 9 . 1 Smith, R. P. 1 7 0 3 1 8 6 6 7 9 1 8 - 1 2 Stokes, G. 6 0 2 9 2 7 2 7 4 . 5 Spencer, R. 1 2 0 1 2 2 5 7 5 8 1 0 - 2 Schultz, S. S. 7 0 6 7 3 7 4 6 9 . 4 S c o t t o n 1 0 0 1 6 7 1 0 0 1 0 4 1 6 - 7 S h o o t e r 4 1 2 3 1 5* 1 8 7 . 2 S h e r w i n 2 9 3 2 0 9 2 6 3 0 8 . 1 Shrewsbury 5 0 6 7 2 7 3 2 1 3 - 2 S h o r e 1 3 6 5 4 2 4 2 4 7-5 Shuter, J. 3 0 3 4 0 2 8 8* 1 0 4 14-24 T a t e 8 1 1 0 7 2 5 3 7 1 5 . 2. Taylor, F. 8 1 8 3 2 9 3 2 1 1 . 6 Trollope, W . S. 4 0 3 2 2 2 2 2 8.0 Thornton(Yorks). 4 0 2 1 7 1 1 5 . 1 W o o f, W .A. 1 2 2 3 5 1 4 1 5 3 . 5 W o o d, A. H. 8 0 1 3 9 7 0 7 4 1 7 - 3 W o o t t o n, G. 2 0 7 4 2 8 8 3 . 3 Whiting, A. Ο. 9 0 1 5 1 8 0 8 3 16.7 Wilson, C. W . 4 0 6 6 5 1 5 6 1 6 . 2 W i l s o n, C. P.. 8 3 5 6 2 4* 2 8 1 1 . 1 W i l d,F. 2 1 3 3 0 1 4 9 4 9 1 6 - 1 3 W r i g h t, W . 1 2 0 1 4 6 4 3 4 9 1 2 - 2 Wingfield 6 0 1 3 5 9 2 - 1 W a k e, W . R. 3 0 1 3 1 1 1 1 4 - 1 Y o u n g 7 1 1 0 9 4 8 4 8 18-1 T H EB O W L E R S . IF no newbowlers came to the front during last season , more than one of those previously before the public added considerably to their reputation . Mr. A. G. Steel , Bates , and Peate are the only bowlers who can claim to have taken more than 100 wickets in first -class matches. The figures attached to these three are significant as showing the markedsuccess which attended the slower deliveries , and, indeed, the faster bowling was altogether at a discount . Allan Hill was never straighter or more effective than early last season , when he unfortunately broke down, but Morley and Mycroft , though the former was no doubt affected considerably by the Nottingham dispute , were heavily punished at times , and Emmettis now anything but a fast bowler. Alfred Shawwas very successful early in the year, and his per- formance in James Lillywhite's benefit , at Brighton, at the close of the season , which will not soon be forgotten , was a sufficient guarantee that he wouldhave been again very near the foremost in the averages of the year