James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1882

9 4 LILLYWHITE'SCRICKETERS' A N N U A L. B O W L I N G A V E R A G E S . Overs. Maidens. Runs. Wickets. J o n e s 5 6 8 - 3 3 1 0 6 6 4 4 5 Average. 14-34 R e a d 2 3 . 0 8 4 6 3 15-1 J. J. Parfitt 2 7 3 - 3 1 2 2 3 9 5 2 2 1 7 - 2 1 B a r r a t t 8 3 8 - 2 3 0 6 1 4 8 9 7 3 19-7 A . P.L u c a s. 8 6 - 3 2 7 1 5 5 8 1 9 - 3 A b e l 4 0 . 0 1 5 5 0 2 2 5 . 0 W .W .R e a d 4 1 . 0 8 1 1 3 4 28.1 W .E . Roller. 1 3 7 - 2 5 7 2 0 0 7 2 8 . 4 P o t t e r 2 0 2 - 2 8 2 3 3 2 1 1 3 0 - 2 B l a m i r e s 196.3 8 4 3 0 5 8 38-1 R i c h a r d s 4 5 . 0 1 5 8 9 2 4 4 - 1 Trollope took two wickets , in twoovers , for two runs ; J. Shuter bowled four overs for 20 runs , G a m esix overs for 22 runs, Pontifex three overs for 13 runs , Caffarey five overs for 19 runs , Johnson 14 overs for 27 runs , and Skinner 16 overs for 23 runs . E X T R A N E O U S M A T C H E SA TT H EO V A L. (Imeach case the winning side is placed first ,) ContendingClubs. W h e nplayed. 1st i n n. 2 n d 1st 2 n d i n n. i n n. i n n. W o nb y (1)CambridgeUniversity v. June 20,21,22 Surrey (2)G e n t l e m e nv. Players (3) Northv. South 3 1 7 *2 7 1 7 3 170 9 wkts.; *1 w d. June30,July1,2 236 *144 July14,15,16 409 197 182 197 121 2 wkts.; *8 w d. Inns. & 91 runs, (1) Surrey v. CambridgeUniversity. Oval, June 20, 21, and22, 1881. Surrey have never of late years been able to get the best of their match with the University , and though on this occasion they had mostof their available forces , the result was never in doubt, The County began fairly well with a total of 173 , but as was generally expected , this sumwasquite insufficient , with their very moderate bowling , to give them a chance. H a dMr. Lucas managedto catch Mr. Ford off his own bowling w h e nthe batsmanhad only madea few runs the outlook for Surrey would have been morefavourable . The chance though was not taken, and Mr. Ford's well hit 102 helped to hasten the ruin of the County , though in all likelihood there would have been the same result , even had he failed . A very fine score of 87 by Mr. W.W. Read redeemed the character of Surrey's