98 TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, LONG ‘ VACATION CLUB. Results of Matches, Muichcs Fluyerf, 11; VFon , 7 ; Drawa 3; LoUy 1. Club. Opponents. Where When 1st 2nd 1st 2nd Opponents. Playod. Played. Inn. Inn. Inn. Inn. Matches If'on (7). Trinity Gd. Juiy 11-12 Won by University Servants . . Trinity Hall and Oahu ,, TJniv. L. V. 0. Jesus College............ College Servants ---- S. E. Circuit ............. St. John’s College.. . . Mutches Drawn (3). Mr. Mellor’s Eleven .. Mr. Hunting’s Eleve , Standard Club ......... Univers. Gd Tesus Grnd Trinity Gd. St John’s G. July 14-15 July 20-21 July 24-25 July 27 July 20 Aug. 2-3 Trinitv Gd. Julv 18-19 Jy.31.Aul. n Aug. 14-15 98 365 147 241 220 104 64 278 170 316 126 *127 232 122 92! 103 lO 131 85 96 44 56 119 185 106 77 163 115 9 w *1 w d — 231 run 3 187 3 w *7 w d 98 Inns. &47 runs *50 176ms* for ow — 48 runs *37 9 w *1 w d Remarls, f 191 *40 ' for 8 w *81 *for 7 w i Lost by *34 9 w * 1 w d 7 Matches Lost (1). The Crusaders ......... Trinity Gd. Aug. 7-8.. f All the drawn matches were in favour of Trinity. X Trinity in this match lost some of their best men. B a t t in g A v e r a g e s . Times Most in Most in Inns. R uhr . not out. om Inna. a Match. Averages. F. H.Mollor ......... .......... 11 427 aw 95 113 47.4 Hon. A. Lyttelton .. .......... 9 393 1 137 137 49.1 W. S. Patterson. . . . O 133 0 126 126 44.0 Hon. E. Lyttelton.. .......... 11 330 1 72 72 33 J. E. Gilbert ......... .......... 6 168 1 142 142 33.3 W. G . Micliell......... .......... 12 233 0 69 69 19.5 O. F. Mundy ......... .......... 10 127 •> o *32 32 18.1 II. Leaf.................... .......... 11 177 1 36 49 17.7 C. H. AYoosman.. . . .......... 5 63 1 30 30 15.3 A. Gray ................ .......... 14 147 1 53 53 11.4 II. O. D. Davidson .......... 13 105 2 *24 24 9.G T. R. Terry............. .......... 10 69 9 21 21 8.5 E. T. Gordon......... .......... 10 63 0 24 24 6.3 R. M. Howard __ .......... 10 CO 0 19 24 G T rinity C ollege L ong V acation E leven IN 1876.— F. H. Mellor, scored ” j — — ---- ------- ~~~~----- i 1 especially to the on ; with practice would bo a good wicket-keeper. H. Loci', rather too impatient as a bat, but hits hard, and has, when he pleases, i g< defence ; safe field W. G Michell, hits well, but has a tendency to l>ill straight bowling, which proved fatal to him several times; is a good ;chl when h ) chooses, but inclined to be slack. (For Hon . E. Lyttelton , •. . . J . J/ji'i'lon, and W. X. Patterson , see University Eleven.) E. T. Gurd >ny <'.<• o play with a straight enough bat to secure success; rather fallen •X iu his fielding. A. Gray , was very successful with his bowling (slow or i ! "th very hiyh delivery), securing 6 t wickets for an average cost of . run, per wicket; a fair bat; slow in the field. H. O. D, David a very hard hitter, and played steadily when steadiness was required; bowia fast round, and is a good field. R. M. Tloia vd> hits hard, but lias no oefeneo; very good field, and sure catch. T. R. Terry , howls fast round, bat without much success; moderate bat and field. 0 . F. M, 2Iundyy