James Lillywhiite's Cricketers' Annual 1874

7 8 9 whole Eleven only 57, 37 of these to Mr. Hamilton , the sole double figures of the side . Surrey won by 117 runs . Surrey , 121 and 246 ; total , 367. Cam- bridge , 193 and 57 ; total , 250 . (3 ) Surreyv. Yorkshire. Sheffield , June, 16 and 17. Abowler's match throughout , three innings only producing 193 runs from the bat. A contest remarkable only as the occasion of Pooley's dismissal from the Surrey Eleven in consequence of misconduct . Yorkshire won by eight wickets , Lockwood making 30, not out , and A. F. Smith, 25, and not out . Surrey , 79 and 84 ; total , 163. Yorkshire , 54 and 113 (two wickets ) ; total , 167 . Emmett, Yorkshire ... w Southerton (1st. Inns .) O v e r s. 4 5 1 7 M a i d e n s. R u n s. W i c k e t s. 1 8 0 7 8 4 2 4 1 2 - 6 (4) Surrey v. Yorkshire. Oval , August 11, 12, 13. Amatchcompletely barren of incident but for the huge score of 113 by Rowbothamon behalf of Yorkshire . On heavy ground Yorkshire decided to go in, and lost six wickets for 75 runs. The end, though, was distant , as when the next batsman went 223 had been made, or a difference of 138 runs. Jupp - n o tthe first time-was chief scorer for Surrey, with 23 and 54, and Hill-as he has done before at the Oval-disturbed the Surrey wickets far too effec- tually . Yorkshire wonby nine wickets , one more than at Sheffield . York- shire , 258 and 36 (one wicket ) ; total , 294. Surrey , 131 and 162 ; total , 2 9 3. bieHill w e i tsifr O v e r s. M a i d e n s. 9 4 3 4 3 R u n s. 1 1 0 W i c k e t s. 9(7 bowled.) oft (5) S u r r e yv. S u s s e x. Brighton , August 21, 22, 23. Amoral victory for Surrey , though very injudicious waste of time on the third day did much to injure their prospects in this way. Jupp led the van for Surrey well again with 94 out of 187, though he gave one very easy chance to Mr. Mare at long -on, that was unaccountably rejected . Five Sussex wickets weredownfor 12 runs , and Surrey were jubilant . Mr. J. M. Cotterill though played splendid cricket at the critical point , and, thanks to his innings of 41 , Sussex were able to reach 91 runs after all . Sussex " followed on," and again Mr. Cotterill madeaninnings of 65 that would have pleased the most fastidious critic . By way of a contrast there were eight double figures in the second innings of Sussex , and the total reached 207, instead of being under three figures as in the first case . Surrey had 111 runs to win, and of these , Jupp (not out, 28) and Richard Humphrey (not out, 41) made 81 without a wicket , so that , obviously , the odds were on the side of Surrey , though the match was drawn. Surrey , 187 and 81 (no wicket ) ; total , 268. Sussex , 91 and 207 ; total, 298. ut oglindaos ) G r o wa m u d d a