James Lillywhiite's Cricketers' Annual 1874

7 7 Club . Opponts . Opponents. W h e r e W h e n Played . Played . 1st 2 n d 1st 2nd Inn. Inn. Inn. Inn. Matches drawn(2). 5 Sussex + Gloucestershire Matches lost (10). 1 Sussex + Gloucestershire 3 Yorkshire. Oval و د R e m a r k s . Brghtn A21-22-23 Bristol A25-26-27 + Lancashire +N o t t s Nottn July10-11 + Lancashire +N o t t s و د Oval Jy14-15-16 33 76 100 115 106 runs Jy21-22-23 102 113 140 1941 1 9 و د +K e n t *8 w d +Middlesex Prnce's A u g7-8 9 7 184 1 8 9 *9 4 9 *1 w d 4 Yorkshire. Oval و د و د *1 wd June5-6-7 Je9-10-11 Sheffild June16-17 M n c h t rJ u n e19-20 187 *81 91 207 *no wickets down 134 1 7 2*281*2 108 123 131 293 79 84 t o d Lost by 92 16627 runs 290 *135 5 wickets *5 w d 54 1138 *2w d و د 4 4 1 0 5 262 Innsa n d113runs 9 3 1 6 8 188 *7 4 6wickets*4 w d Mdstne July 28-29 142 84 99 *128 2 wickets A11-12-13 | 131 162 258 *369 [Thenumbers attached to the several contests show the order in which they are treated in following notes .] + These have already been criticised in reviews of Gloucestershire , Kent, Lanca shire , Middlesex , and Notts . (1) Surreyv. Sussex. Oval , June 5, 6, 7. Thefirst match of the season , and the first of a series of reverses . This time, though, Surrey had no excuse of ill luck , for the fielding at times was far from perfect , and Charlwood was allowed to make 43 in the second innings of Sussex, thanks to a very bad " miss " by Mr. Chenery at long -on. This was the first appearance of Southerton against his native county under the new rules , and his value was clearly proved , as he secured nine wickets , and in the two innings made the highest aggregate of 35 runs . Surrey had 150 runs to win, but Fillery's bowling unsettled them altogether , and they lost by 27 runs . Surrey , 108 and 123 ; total , 231. Sussex , 92 and 66 ; total , 258. Southerton , Surrey Fillery , Sussex Overs. Maidens. R u n s. Wickets. τ ο 0 3 8 9 105.1 4 3 4 4 8 7 1 2 3 9 1 3 S T S W ةثرإلاو br(2) Surreyv. CambridgeUniversity. Oval, June 12, 13, 14. tro Avictory after all for Surrey , though they were 72 runs to the bad on the first innings . Mr. Boult (26 and 51), just defeated Jupp (37 and 39), for the premier place among the batsmen of Surrey , and the county succeeded in more than doubling their first score in the second innings , Richard Humphreyb making a creditable score of 51 on their behalf . Cambridge , in their second attempt , were feeble in the extreme , four wickets going for 10 runs , and the