Cricket 1913

August 16, 1913. CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME 509 Wiltshire v. Surrey II. A t L eigh to n , W estbury, August 6 and 7. M yers and W illiam A b e l m ade a long stand for the second w icket of Surrey, and later B lack lid ge and A . W. F. R u tty scored freely. T h e hom e side m ade a fairly good reply, J. R. T ayler a n d N ewm an p layin g w e ll; but they cou ld not save the follow -on, and in their second innings failed badly before F reem an and C . T . A . W ilkin son ; a stand late in the in nin gs b y T . S. Lu ce and C. W . H urn being the only redeem in g feature o f the display. Surrey II. won by an in n in gs and 7 runs. S u rrey II. C. T. A. Wilkinson, st Luce, b Laverton ............... Mvcrs, c R.W .Awdry. b Newman Abel (W.J.) c Hum , b Laverton Peach, c Seilick, b Laverton 1). Roberts, b Mitchell ............... Narraway, c Laverton b M itchell........................... Mason, c Nevxman, b Mitchell ... 101 5 28 BlacklHge, not out A. W. F. Rutty, c Newman, Seilick ... ............... Sullivan, c R. W. Awdry, b Seilick Freeman, lbw, b Mitchell E xtras ... ............... Total First Innings. C. S. Awdry, c Rutty, b Wilkinson W. R. C. Lavei ton, c Blacklidge, b Wilkinson ........................... H. Taunton, c Myers, b Abel ... J. R. Tavler, st Narraway, b Blacklidge ........................... Sellick, c and b Blacklid<re Newman, c Narraway, b Blacklidge R. W. Awdry, c and b Peach ... C. W. Hurn b M yers ............... T. S. Luce, b W iik in so n ............... Mitchell, b Wilkinson ............... H. Sydee, not o u t ............... E x t r a s ....................................... W il t s h ir e . Second Innings. 6 c Wilkinson, b Freeman 4 c Wilkinson, b Freeman 31 c Peach, b Freeman ... 62 c Narraway, b Wilkinson 10 c Peach, b Freeman ... 91 c Rutty, b Wilkinson 11 c Peach, b Wilkinson 7 b Freeman ............... 18 not o u t .......................... 15 b Blacklidge ............... 0 c Myers, b Wilkinson 2 E'xti as ............... Total Total ... W il t s h ir e B o w l e r s ’ A n a l y s is . O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Mitchell .. 25 2 92 4 R. W. Awdry 3 0 37 0 Laverton 17 0 93 3 Sellick .. 4 0 21 2 Sjdee 3 0 31 0 Tayler .. 3 0 28 0 Newman .. 12 1 72 1 S u r r e y I I . B o w l e r s ’ A n a l y s is . O . M. R. W. O . M .' R. W. Freeman 10 3 21 0 19 7 38 5 Wilkinson 21.4 2 90 4 14.4 1 59 4 Blacklidge 20 1 73 3 4 1 15 1 Abel 8 1 26 1 — — — — Peach .. 6 0 19 1 — — — — Myers .. 5 0 25 1 — — — — Dorsetshire v. Cornwall. At Poole, August 6 and 7. At the end of the first day’s play the visitors appeared to have the upper hand, Dorset being only 3 runs on with 3 wickets down (all bowled by Hawken) in their second venture. But Goodden, who had played a good not-out innings at the first time of asking, again did fine work, and Busk helped him in a last-wicket stand that proved the turning-point of the game; for Corn- wall, going in to make 159 for victory, just failed, in spite of good innings by Humphrey, a new man, Davies, and Vibart. McIntyre bowled capitally for Dorset; and he, Goodden, and Walby had most to do with the hard-won victory of their side. Dorset seem quite a hefty team this year, with a decided faculty for rising to the occasion. D o r s e ts h ir e . Second Innings. 22 b Hawken _ First Innings. F. A. 8 . Sewell, b Whiting Freeman (E. J.), Ibw, b W hiting C. J. B. Webb, run out ............... jl. B. Cummins, b W hiting J* K. Mam/er, c W. N. Biokford-'mith, b W hiting ....................................... P. P. Hope, b W hiting ... ............... C. P. Goodden, not out ........................... Walby, c W. N. Bickford-Smith, b Trevarthen ... ........................... H.W .Farrer,cTrevarthen, b Humphrey R. D. Busk, c Vibart, bTrevarthen E. A. McIntyre, b Trevarthen ... Extras ................................................... Total .......................... 1 c Vibart, b W h itin g ............. 8 4 b Hawken ......................... 0 1 b Hawken ... ............. 7 5 c Barnes, b Whiting ... ... 19 22 b W hiting ... ............. 0 51 notout ... ... ............. 80 69 cW .N.Bickford-Sm ith,bHawk 6 n 6 29 b T re v a rtlie n ......................... 0 ... 30 ............... 14 1 b Trevarthen b W hiting Extra Total First Innings. C o r n w a l l . Second Innings. ... 169 H. Tresawna, c Farrer, b M cIntyre 53 c Manger, b M cIntyre 0 W. N. Bickford-Smith, c Goodden , b M clntvre 19 c Farrer, b M cIntyre... 5 Barney, c McIntyre, b Freeman 53 c Webb, b M cIntyre ... 18 R. Holman, c W alby, b Webb ... 18 b M cIntyre 0 Vibart, c Mange , b Webb 14 b M cIntyre 30 J. C. Bickford-Smith, c Farrer, b Webb 26 lbw, b McIntyre 0 C. B. Humphrey, c Farrer, b M cIntyre 9 b W alb y............... 55 J. Davies, c Freeman, b Wi bb ... 5 not out ... 30 Trevarthen, M cIntyre ... 11 c Busk, b Cummins 4 E. Hawken, b M cIn ty re............... 2 c Farrer, b Cummins... 0 Whiting, not out ... 9 b Cummins 2 Extras ........................... 11 Extras 8 Total ........................... 230 Total ... 152 C o r n w a ll B o w le r s ’ 1 A n a ly s is . O. M. R. W . O. M. R. W. Hawken ........................... 7 0 37 0 ... 13 2 42 4 W hiting ... ............... 21 2 57 5 ... 25 6 58 4 H um phrey......................... 8 0 57 1 ... 2 0 8 0 Trevarthen ............... 7 0 34 3 ... 12.5 1 45 2 Barnes ........................... 4 0 13 0 ... 5 0 15 0 Davies .......................... 6 1 16 0 ... — — — — D o r setsh ir e B o w le r s ’ A n a ly sis . 0. M. R. w. o. M. R. W. Hope ... ............... 2 0 13 0 ... 2 0 2 0 Walby ............... ... 2 0 2 0 ... 3 0 8 1 McIntyre ............... ... 20-2 3 69 5 -. 11 1 78 6 Sewell ... ... ... 2 0 12 0 ... — — — — B u sk ....................................... 7 0 30 0 ... 1 0 5 0 Cummins ........................... 7 1 12 0 ... 11.4 0 51 3 Webb ... ... ... 18 0 69 4 ... — — — — Freeman ........................... 4 1 13 1 ... — Suffolk v. Hertfordshire. At Felixstowe, August 6 and 7. Penfold and F. R. C. Cobbold, the Westminster boy, kept down the visitors’ scoring to quite moderate dimensions; but Suffolk failed before Burton and W. H. Marsh, only F. L. Titchmarsh staying long, and were obliged to follow on. In their second innings they did much better, thanks largely to a resolute stand of qq for the ninth wicket by Cobbold and Captain H. M. Lawrence, who years ago played in two or three matches for Kent. Hertfordshire easily knocked off the runs, and won by 5 wickets. H e r t f o r d sh ir e . First Innings. S. G. Etheridge, c Cornell, b Penfold Golding, c Penfold, b Cobbold ('. H. Titchmarsh, c Connell, b Cobbald E. S. Household, b Penfold ............... Rev. C. G. Ward, c Whatman, b Penfold W . H . Marsh, b Titchmarsh ............... C. H . Tait, c Cornell, b Cobbold A. S. Thorpe, c Cobbold, b Lawrence N .J . Cox, c Mortimer, b Lawrence ... Burton, st Cornell, b Cobbold............... Shelford, not o u t ....................................... E x tr a s ....................................... Second Innings. 62 b Waters ............... 27 4 c Whatman, b Penfold 32 7 c Mortimer, b Penfold 41 55 run o u t............... 0 0 b Pen fold ............... 36 6 not out... 5 38 not o u t ........................... 3 17 8 6 0 10 Extras ............... 19 Total 213 S u f f o l k . First Innings. H. Bassett, c Titchmarsh, b Marsh ... 15 A. D. Whatman, b Burton ... ... 16 Penfold, c Shelford, b Burton ... ... 2 H. A. Busher, c Thorpe, b Burton ... 5 F. L. Titchmarsh, c Ward, b Marsh ... 33 J. N. Richardson, b Burton ... ... 0 F. R. C. Cobbold, st Tichmarsh, b Marsh 4 O. Mortimer, b B u rto n ............... ... 10 P. P. Cornell, c Burton, b Marsh ... 0 Capt. H. M. Lawrence, c Thorpe, b Marsh 0 Waters, not out Extras 102 Total (8 wkts) Second Innings. b Burton ............... c Thorpe, b Cox ............... c Ward, b Marsh ............... c Marsh, b Burton ... b Cox ... ........................... b Cox ............... . ... st Tichmarsh, b Household c Etheridge, b C o x ............... b Cox ....................................... not o u t ....................................... c Ward, b Marsh Extras 163 53 19 13 17 21 1 49 0 2 62 3 33 Total ... S u ffo lk B ow lers ' A n a lysis . O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Penfold ............... 26 13 48 4 18 6 38 3 Cobbold ............... 27 5 75 4 10 1 48 0 Waters 14 3 .9 0 8 0 28 1 Lawrence ... ............... 9 0 42 2 4 0 17 0 Bassett ... — — — — ••• 4.1 H e r t f o r d s h ir e B o w le r s ’ A n a ly s is . 2 13 0 O. M. R. W. O. M. R. w. Cox ... ............... 5 0 27 0 16 0 54 5 Burton ............... 13 3 33 5 32 5 109 2 Marsh 8.1 1 25 5 16.5 4 57 2 Shelford — — — 10 4 15 0 H ousehold ... — — — — „ 2 0 5 1