Cricket 1913
August 2, 1913. CRICKET: \ WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 477 Cricket Chirps. (B y E. H. D. S e w e l l .) I suppose the K ent v. M iddlesex match at the M ete would be regarded by the m ajority of follow ers of the game as the ch ief gam e of last. week. C ertain ly either tai! or short scoring attracts most notice. From the moment it was to be a case o f scratching for runs, it was 5 to i on K ent, for they had three left-arm s to-the one of M iddlesex for a pitch on which an in d ivid u al 50 is an impossibility, bar abnormal luck, against good left-arm bowling. T he wonder of the game w as the 6 for 21 by popular old Jack when T arran t could not do anythin g lik e it. T h e cricket vocabulary 01 praise has long been exhausted in old Jack ’s case, lie ’s like good wine. I am not at a ll sure th at the palm for last week should not be giv en to Jessop. S ix w ickets and a hundred runs make a pretty good m atch for anyone, but a very great deal hangs on when those runs and w ickets arrived. Jessop’s 2 for 3 is the best clin ch er there has been in big cricket for a long time. He and F . R. F oster and A. R. Litteljohn and D. R. Osborne should make the E a lin g X I. even more form idable than it has been for years in London club cricket. T h e on ly tie m atch I have ever played in was on the E a lin g ground, and C. B. G race was, I think, the man who w as cau ght off what w ould have been the w inn ing hit. Is there any gam e to equal cricket- in a match th at matters - for excitem ent when it comes to. a close th in g? Only R ugger, in m y view , approaches it, though fo lk have per spired ere now on the 18th green in various parts of the world. I am asked at least once a day : “ W h at am ateurs are going to South A frica ?” Inasm uch as I am given to under stand that the selectors would lik e to h ave the correct answer to that query, it is not much use askin g me ! A s a shaft drawn at a venture, I should set down B ird, D ou glas, and F oster as the lik e lie st; but, to tell the truth, goodness only know s ! T he Incogniti seem lik e ly to have a usefu l side for their trip to the States. T h e Hon. H. G. M ulh olland, M. F alcon, and B. G. Von B. M elle have recently been elected to the fam ous club, and are of the party. Philadelphian cricket w ill have to be as strong as ever it was to win. A dropped catch settled Lan cashire at Horsham .- A. H. L an g thanked them by m akin g 71 in not very much over an hour. T h is is L a n g ’s first score since he got that nasty smack on the right cheekbone from a “ ju m p e r” sent down by P eat at Stoke P oges a fortnight before the ’V arsity match, in which it w as a m istake, on form , to p lay him as stumper. T h e E ssex bow lin g got into trouble at Leyton on Satur day, and I am sure nobody laughed more than the bow ler, if he read it, at the profound criticism that Perrin w as the only one to cause the batsmen any trouble. S till, they got 8 byes off his first over. T hree centuries for Hants does not m ake it seem quite a ll right that O., C. B rislow e, the young O ld E ton ian disciple of Y o u n g Jack H earne, w ill plav fo r the Gentlem en before long for his bow ling. T hey collected 91 off his 15 overs for no wicket. U xb rid ge v. M .C .C . was one of the rumm iest of matches recently. U xbrid ge put together 328, then R. O. Schwarz took 7 for 15, and M .C .C . were out for 37. T here was no discussion as to the ad visab ility of m akin g the C lub follow - on, and n ext time B. J. T . Bosanquet had 6 for 15. But M .C .C ., who made 25 this tim e, had not quite fathomed Schw arz yet, as he took 4 for 9. T h is must be one of the most extraordinary results ever seen in M .C .C . club games. It is a trifle am using to read week a fte r w eek of the deeds of club cricketers in and about London who m ake centuries and take 7 for 25 and 6 for 14, and so on. On the b^ength of these perform ances on inadequate pitches again st im per fect batsmen or bow lers devoid of real sting, each man is in his turn held up as a certain success “ if only he could spare the time for county crick et.” W h a t a farce it a ll is ! T ria ls given to such men gen erally p tove them quite incapable in first-class company. In batting they p lay back on fast w ickets and forw ard on slow . In bow lin g they never find a length, or the w icket isn ’t to their lik in g , and in fielding they in variab ly fling hard to the w rong end. Ah ! it’s a very w ide g u lf between London club cricket and the first-class game. N obody know s the w idth of it better than the cricketers them selves, and nobody disregards it w ith more persistent naivHe than the w ell-m ean ing but uninform ed w riters who make it their w eekly task to w rite up the heroes o f Suburbia. It happened once that the F ates presented me w ith a cen tury in a match against a club not a hundred m iles from C harin g Cross. A club to breathe o f which as anythin g but a lead in g first-class club w ould be to comm it high treason and court furious letters to the e d ito r.' I take no pleasure in recording the fact that throughout the two hours I was perm itted to stay at the w icket the field w as never properly- set, no m atter who bowled. H ow some club teams ever win a match is a positive enigm a— and, at the same tim e, per haps one of the ch ief charm s of the gam e, and the raison d'etre of its long and health y life. Club Cricket in the North. M itchell and B u tler’s put up 301 for 5, declared, v. M oseley in a B irm ingham L eagu e m atch on Saturday, W il kinson, form erly of the Y orksh ire team , hittin g up 143 in a couple of hours (three 6’s, tw enty-two 4’s included). A. O. Parsons scored 76, and he and the pro. added 147 to geth er in an hour. But the brew ery team did not win. Steady batting by G. H. T y le r and splendid hitting by F. G. Stephens (117 in an hour !) resulted in a stand of 130'for the first M oseley w icket, and at draw ing of stumps the score w as 204 for 5, over 500 runs h avin g been made during the afternoon. Sm ethw ick easily beat Stourbridge, Buclcnell’s 8 w ickets for the winners being the most notable perform ance of the gam e. A ston U n ity still more easily defeated W est B rom w ich D artm outh, who could only m ake 116, to which the U n ity replied w ith 311. It was curious that no one should reach 50 in so big a total. W a ls a ll jeopardised their chances of the championship by gettin g beaten at D udley. H andsworth W ood declared at 247 for 9 (A. E . M ainw aring 89), and beat K idderm in ster by 76 ju st on time. T . S. H asw ell took 5 for 24 for the winners. Scarborough had 6 w ickets down for a single v. H u ll, but u ltim ately to talled 133, a result h igh ly creditable to the tail-end men. H u ll won easily. R ad ley took 4 w ickets with 4 successive b a lls for Ossett v. C hickenley. G eorge Leach made an adm irable 103 (fifteen 4’s) for R aw ten stall v. Church, and afterw ards took 4 fo r 40, F. Haworth takin g 6 for 64. H. Cudw orth (96*) played right through for B u rn ley v. N elson— at least, as far as the inn ings went, for the closure was applied at 185 for g. He did not get his cen tu ry; but he got a collection of £o> tos.— which is the sort of thing they do for amateurs in L an ca shire L eagu e circles ! F or B acup v. Ramsbottom , Kerm ode
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDg4Mzg=