Cricket 1913

398 CRICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. J u l y 12, 1913. First Innings. Hayward, c MacLeod, b Huddleston S u r r e y . Second Innings. ... 57 c MacLeod, b Huddleston .. . 22 Hobbs, c Makepeace, b Dean 3 b Dean ........................... 6 Hayes, c Hornby, b Huddleston ... ••• 3 b Dean 2 Goatly, lbw, b Huddleston................ 7 b Dean ................ • 13 Sandham, b Dean ... 29 b Dean ........................... 0 Harrison, not out ............................ ••• 39 b Huddleston .............. 3 M. C. Bird, b Heap ... ... 24 c E. Tyldesley, b Dean • 54 Spring, b Dean ............................ ... 13 b Huddleston 0 Strudwick, lbw, b Huddleston 7 c Whitehead, b Dean 10 Hitch, lbw, b Huddleston ... 12 not out 4 Rushby, c Tyldesley, b Dean 0 b Dean ........................... 0 B. 11, l.b. 6, n.b. 1 ... 18 B. 4, l.b. 3, n.b. 1 8 Total ... 212 Total . 122 First Innings. L a n c a s h ir e . Second Innings. A. H. Hornby, lbw, b Bird ... 14 Ibw, b Rushby .............. 1 Makepeace, c Hayes, b Goatly 9 b Spring ........................... • 24 Tyldesley (J. T.), c and b Rushby ... 9 b Spring ........................... • 19 Tyldesley (W.), c Rushby, b Bird ... 0 c Hayward, b Rushby . 14 Tyldesley (E.), c Strudwick, b Rushby K. G. MacLeod, c Sandham, b Goatly ... 36 run out ........................... . 27 2 b Spring ........................... 1 Heap, c Hayes, b Goatly ................ 3 runout 4 R. A. Boddington, b Rushby 5 b Spring ........................... 4 Whitehead (R.), c Strudwick, b Rushby 2 not out • 13 Huddleston, not out ................ • •• 13 . c Hobbs, b S p r in g .............. 6 Dean, b Goatly ............................ 1 2 b Spring ........................... 0 B. 1, l.b. 1 ............................ 2 B. 2, l.b. 3, n.b. 1 . 6 Total ................ ... 107 Total . 119 L an cash ir e B o w ler s ’ A n a ly sis . Dean Huddleston . Heap Rushby ................ G oatly .................... B ir d ............................. Spring ................ Hitch ................ Hitch delivered one no-ball in the second innings Umpires : F. Roberts and H. Butt. O. M. R. W. 0. M. R. W. 42 -* 9 117 4 25-5 4 70 7 36 13 59 5 24 13 33 3 H 1. 5 18 1 8 3 11 0 Huddleston delivered one no- ball. trrey B o w ler s ’ A n a ly sis . 0. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. 29 15 41 4 26 14 30 2 22*5 4 48 4 5 1 25 0 6 1 16 2 5 0 12 0 — — — --- 22 7 38 6 — — — --- 2 1 8 0 Warwickshire v. Kent. At Edgbaston, July 8 and 9, rain preventing any play on the first day. Hatfeild was the solitary amateur in the Kent eleven. Seeing how much the conditions helped the bowlers, Warw ickshire may be said to have made a good fight. At one time they had scored 80 for 3; but then Blythe and Woolley, who shared the ten wickets, carried all before them. Smith, who made 28 of the first 29, Quaife, and Parsons showed the best batting form. Kent started none too well, for with only 50 up Humphreys, Hardinge, and Woolley were all out. Then Seymour and Hubble became partners, and Were still together at the close of play, when the visitors held a slight lead with seven wickets in hand. Hubble was l.b.w. after he had rattled up 75, but Seymour now had the satisfaction of reaching three figures. These two men added 183 in 110 minutes, and both punished the attack severely. Hatfeild declared as soon as Kent were 200 on, and then Fielder bowled his fastest to get the home side out in time. At first only Charlesworth could offer any resistance, though later Stephens and Crockford made a stand. But their effort came too late, the Hop County win­ ning handsomely by an innings and 51. First Innings. Smith (E. J.), c Hatfeild, b Woolley Parsons, b Woolley ... Charlesworth, st Huish. b Blythe ... Quaife, c Seymour, b Blythe F. R. Foster, b Woolley Baker, not out G. W. Stephens, c Woolley, b Blvthe E. B. Crockford, c Huish, b Woolley Teeves, b Blythe ............................ Santall, lbw. b Blythe Taylor, c Huish, b Woolley Byes ... ................ T o ta l................ W ar w ick sh ir e . Second Innings. c Hatfeild, b Fairservice 31 c Woolley, b Fielder... o c Huish. b Fielder ... 20 b Fielder o b Woolley 35 c Huish, b Woolley ... o b Fairservice ... 16 c Sevmour, b Fairservice 3 b Woolley 3 st Huish, b Woolley 14 not out 9 B. 4, l.b. 1, n.b. 5 159 Total K en t . Humphreys, b Jeeves ................ 13 Hardinge, c Charlesworth, b Foster 25 Sevmour (Jas.), c Charlesworth, b Santall ... ... ... ... 106 Woolley (F. E.), lbw, b Jeeves ... 3 Hubble, lbw, b Jeeves ... ... 75 Jennings, c Parsons, b Jeeves ... 72 Blythe and Fielder did not bat. C. E. Hatfeild, b Quaife ... Huish. c Smith, b Santall Fairservice. not out B. 14, l.b. 7, w. 4, n.b. 1 Total (for 8 wkts., dec.)... 371 K e n t B o w le r s ’ A n a ly s is . O. M. R. W. Blythe ... 32 13 47 5 Woolley ... 30-3 8 75 5 Fairservice 12 4 20 o 7 3 8 0 W a r w ic k s h ir e B o w le r s ’ A n a ly s is ' O. M. R. W. 27 6 78 2 O. M. R. W. 7 4 9 0 Foster 18-3 4 45 4 Santall 12 7 27 3 Jeeves — — -------- Taylor ..j 22 3 70 3 Charlesworth Parsons Fielder delivered five 110-balls in second innings. Quaife Humphreys Fielder ... 18 3 75 27-2 4 90 3 Umpires : Phillips and Street. 4 o 25 o 3 1 12 o 2 o 14 o 12 o 51 I Jeeves bowled three wides and one no-ball and Foster one- wide. Oxford University v. Cambridge University. At Lord’s, July 7, 8, and 9. At. the last moment Mul­ holland substituted Naumann for Baker, ow ing to the state of the w icket after rain in the night. Cambridge was thus represented by three men from Marlborough, and one each from Durham, Eton, Harrow, Malvern, Repton, Rossall, and Wellington, with one colonial. Oxford had three from Eton, one each from Brighton, Repton, Rossall, Sedbergh, Shrewsbury, and Tonbridge, and two colonials, both Rhodes Scholars. O f the Cambridge team Kidd had played in three previous ’Varsity matches, Mulholland and Saville in two e a ch ; Calthorpe and Lagden played last yea r; Cumberlege, Fairbairn, and Lang are seniors, Davies, Naumann, and Woodroffe freshmen. Five old Blues were omitted— Baker, Franklin, Hopley, Morrison, and Riley'—■ which is undoubtedly a record. On the Oxford side Twining was playing his fourth match, Campbell and Bardsley their third, Fraser and Knott their second; Boswell, Colman, Peat, and Wilkinson are seniors, Davies and Mell£ freshmen. The first day ’s play was witnessed by over 10,000 people ; but it cannot be said that they saw anything very exhilarat­ ing. The wicket w as one of varying paces, and never quite easy except after a shower; and the Dark Blues had to struggle for runs against very judiciously managed bowling and first-rate fielding. They made a wretched start— Bardsley caught at mid-off from a rising one at 2, Twining bowled off stump at 14, and Knott beaten by one that kept low at 17. Thereafter Colman and his captain added 68 before Campbell was out to a wonderful catch by Kidd in the gully, the old Wellingtonian dabbing down one hand and taking the ball about ankle-high. Colman left at 90. Wilkinson and Boswell added 36, but after their parting the end soon came. The total of 141 took 195 minutes. The Cambridge captain had the heavy roller on, and before call of time— in about an hour— Cumberlege and L an g sent up 44, and were still together at the close. Not another run was added next morning before L an g left, clean bowled by Melle, who nine runs later took a return from Cumberlege. The rest of the innings was Melle, Lagden, and a number of minor persona; dramatis. Melle bowled almost through­ out, with a peculiarly placed field, quite a cluster of men between mid-on’s place and sauare-leg; he never seemed to tire in the least; and he varied the nasty swinging-in ball with an occasional one that broke back sharply. Lagden did not start too well, and when 16 he was palpably missed by Havelock Davies in the slips; but he proved the mainstay of his side, and his 71, made in n o minutes— a good pace for most batsmen, but slow for him-— included eleven 4’s. Calthorpe helped him to make the best stand of the innings, 46 for the seventh wicket. Apart from the Afrikander, the Oxford bowling seemed poor, and their fielding was not equal to that of Cambridge, though in this the state of the ground, faster than on Monday, but not as true as usual, told against them. Colman and Campbell were the pick, and there was nothing amiss with Tw ining behind the wicket. Oxford made a better start in their second innings. The first wicket produced 33 in 25 minutes before Twining was out to an easy catch at mid-on. Colman, one of the hopes of the side, got one too good for him from Naumann. and two wickets were down w ith the arrears still not cleared off. But Bardsley and Boswell put a far better complexion 011 affairs. Bardsley went for the bowling w ith rare vini. and Boswell showed nerve and hitting powers. They added 65 runs in about an hour, and then the old Salopian was