Cricket 1913

Jun e 7, 1913. CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. First Innings. Rhodes, c Mulholland, b White Wilson (B. B.), c Lang, b White . Denton, c White, b Mulholland Drake, lbw, b Naumann Hirst, b White .......................... Kilner, c and b Davies Birtles, st Lang, b Kidd ... |. Tasker, c Saville, b White Haigh, c Mulholland, b Kidd Bayes, b White .......................... D olphin, not out B. 8, l.b. 2, w. 2, n.b. 11 Y o rksh ir e . Second Innings. ... 102 c Cumberlege, b Saville ... 14 c Lang, b Kidd ............... ... 35 c Cumberlege, b Kidd 6 c Mulholland, b Calthorpe .. ... 12 c and b Kidd ............... 19 lbw, b Davies... 18 not out 1 c White, b Kidd .............. 39 72 46 108 29 7 Total B. 7, l.b. 1, w. 2, n.b. 1 11 Total (for 7 wkts. dec.) 361 First Innings. Cumberlege, st Dolphin, b Rhodes Davies, c Rhodes, b Haigh ... Saville, b Rhodes Lagden, c Drake, b Rhodes H. G. H. Mulholland, b Rhodes Kidd, c Tasker, b Rhodes ... Lang, c Dolphin, b Rhodes ... C. Wood, b Drake F. S. G. Calthorpc, b Hirst ... . Nauinann, c Dolphin, b Rhodes hitc, not out ............................. B. 5, l.b. 5, n.b. 3 Total C am br id ge U n iv e r sit y . Second Innings. 24 b Drake 0 49 b Drake ... 14 0 c and b Rhodes ••• 35 4 b Rhodes ... 42 123 notout ... 5° 11 c Birtles, b Rhodes ... ... 8 11 c Dolphin, b Wilson ... 19 41 34 15 B. S. G. B. S. H. R. B. Hon. E. L. A. H. G. K. Hon. J. H. J- W White ................ Naumann Calthorpe Kidd Mulholland ... Lagden ................ Davies Saville . . . . . . White delivered seven no-balls, Naumann one wide and four 110-balls, and Kidd one wide in the first innings. Naumann delivered one no-ball. Calthorpe and Saville each bowled one wide in the second innings. Y o rk sh ir e B o w ler s ’ A n a lysis . Hirst ................ Bayes Rhodes ... .». Haigh D rake .................... Kilner ................ Denton Wilson • 13 B . 11, l.b. 3 , w. 1, n.b. i 16 • 340 Total (for 6 wkts.) 184 IBRIDGE BOW LERS’ A n a l y SIS. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. 26-1 3 75 5 15 3 68 0 23 8 66 I 8 1 31 0 7 1 23 0 29 2 88 1 10 1 50 2 18 1 54 4 2 0 I 7 1 11 1 39 0 3 0 13 0 — — — — 3 0 9 1 9 0 29 1 — — — — _ 7 9 41 1 Umpires : Atfield and Parris. O. M. R. W. 0 . M. R. W. 14 4 3 i 1 — — — — 17 I 92 0 11 2 35 0 37-5 13 98 7 12 6 14 3 26 12 38 1 6 0 22 0 17 5 57 1 11 2 37 2 4 1 11 0 5 2 17 0 — — — — 5 0 21 0 — — — — 4 4 0 22 I lls and Kilner one in the first innings. 1 Wilson delivered one 110-ball in the second innings. prise, were soon o u t; and Nason, the last hope, left for a sin g le ; and all the rest could do w as to figh t their hardest for a draw . T hey m anaged it, th an ks to rain and timely stubbornness on the part of Sm ith and H u ggin s. But one wonders w hat the Sussex men think of the allocation of points in this m atch? One point to them ; three points to their opponents, who at the close needed the trifle of 175 runs to w in with three tail-end w ickets to f a ll; and the other point gone-—whither, none can te ll! Sewell hit five 4’s in his 22, and D ipper batted 65 m inutes for 19. First Innings. Vine, b Parker Cox, b Huggins ............................. Relf (A. E.), c Dipper, b Dennett ... Relf (R. R.), c Nason, b Parker ... P. G. H. F'ender, lbw, b Dennett ... Charlwood, c Smith, b Parker H. P. Chaplin, c Truman, b Dipper Killick, b Truman ... Jupp, b Dennett Vincett, st Smith, b Dennett Street, not out ............................. B. 2, l.b. 3, w. 1 ... Total ................ First Innings. G l C. O. H. Sewell, c Chaplin, b Relf (A. Dipper, c Cox, b Relf (A. E.) Langdon, c Relf (A. E.), b Cox C. S. Barnett, c Vine, b Relf (A. F 2 .) M. A. Green, st Street, b Vincett ... J. W. W. Nason, lbw, b Fender T. A. Truman, b Fender Smith, lbw, b Relf (A. E .) ................ Huggins, c Fender, b C o x ................ Parker, lbw, b C o x ............................. Dennett, not out B. 7, l.b. 3 ................................... Total ................ S ussex . Second Innings. c Dipper, b Huggins 59 ... 14 c Smith, b H uggins................ 21 ... 68 c Nason, b Huggins ... 120 . 2 0 c Sewell, b Huggins ... 12 ... 15 b Dipper 42 5 ... 26 c Smith, b H uggins................ 3 ... 37 ... 13 not out ............................. 4 !!! 6 B. 15, l.b. 2, w. 6, n.b. j 24 ... 259 Total (for 6 wkts. dec.) 285 u cestersh ir e . Second Innings. E.) 21 c Vine, b Jupp 22 ... 19 c Vincett, b Relf (A. E.) 19 ... 140 c Vincett, b Relf (A. E.) 5 4 b Jupp ............................. 1 ... 21 c Street, b Relf (A. E.) 18 O st Street, b Relf (A. E.) 1 O lbw, b Vincett ................ 6 ... 14 not out ............................. 14 ... 19 not out ............................. 19 ... 17 IO B y e s ............................. 5 ... 266 Total (for 7 wkts.)... 104 M. R. W. O. M. R. W. 7 82 3 15 4 34 0 11 9 i 4 19 I 64 0 2 33 I 23*2 5 65 5 1 37 I 15 2 72 1 — — — ; 3 0 20 0 Gloucestershire v. Sussex. At Gloucester, May 29, 30, and 31. Charlwood replaced H. L. Wilson, and on the other side Huggins played instead of Cranfield. Chaplin won the toss, but his side did not make by any means a good start. Of the earlier batsmen only Albert Relf did w ell; he was in 100 minutes for his 68, and hit eight 4’s. Four wickets were down for 116 when he le ft; two more quickly fe ll; but Chaplin and Killick added 38, and the latter and Jupp 72, and after all the useful total of 259 was registered. Scoring was never brisk; 250 minutes were occupied by the innings. Before time the home side had lost Sewell and had 42 up. On Friday 1 -angdon played one of his best innings. The support he received was of the poorest; but in 170 minutes he made 140, including three 6 ’s and twenty 4’s, and gave only one actual chance. Thanks to him, the home team had a first innings’ lead of seven runs. When Sussex batted again Cox was out at 42, but Vine and Albert Relf had added 1^0 unparted before drawing of stumps. On Saturday rain delayed the resumption. When play did begin only 8 were added before Vine, who had batted 150 minutes and had been twice missed, was out. Robert Relf did not stay lo n g ; but his brother and Fender forced the game, adding 41 in 15 minutes. Albert Relf was then out after making 120 in '45 minutes in fine style. Soon after lunch the innings was declared at 285 for 6, and the home side went in to make 279 to win in 200 minutes, which m ight have meant an afternoon’s play full of thrills, for any result would have l>f|,n possible— had only Jessop been there! But the Croucher w as playing for Ealing, and Sewell and Langdon, the two men on the side most likely to have effected a sur- G lo u cestersh ir e B o w lin g A n a lysis . O. P arker .................................... 39 D en n ett ... ... ... 39*4 H u ggins ................................... 14 D ip p er ... ... ... 9 T rum an ... • ... ... 5 N ason ... ... ... — D ipp er delivered one w ide in the first innings. P arker d elivered one 110-ball, H uggins bow led four w ides, and D ipp er tw o w ides in the second innings. S u ssex B o w ler s ’ A n a lysis . R elf (R . R .) ................................ R elf (A. E .).......................... F en der V in e ................................ V in ce tt ................................ C o x ................................................ Jupp .......................... U m pires : Street and B arlow . 0 . M. R. W. 0 . M. R. W. 13 2 37 0 — — — — 27 10 68 4 22 16 14 4 12 4 26 2 5 2 14 0 7 2 26 0 — — — — 8 3 36 I 8 4 14 I 14*5 2 54 3 8 4 9 0 6 3 9 0 18 6 48 2 Surrey v. Warwickshire. At the Oval, May 29, 30, and 31. Warwickshire lacked Field, who had been hurt at Southampton, and Surrey played Blacklidge and Spring for Goatly and Rushby, the latter down with a chill on the kidneys. Foster won the to ss; but a wretched start was made, and for the nest of the day the Midlanders were labouring to retrieve it, though it is a fair question whether some of the later batsmen need have been quite so laborious. Three wickets were down for 24. Quaife and Baker stopped the ro t; but nearly all the hitting of their partnership was supplied by the little man, who really seems to improve with age. The fourth wicket added 123 in 2 hours. Quaife reached his 100 in 205 minutes, and batted in all just over 4 hours. Eighteen 4’s were included in his 124; he scored all round the wicket, and gave no chance. Parsons was slow, but Jeeves did a little hitting. The score at the finish was 325 for 9. In the night there was a thunderstorm, and Foster declared at once under the new rule. It was a good move; but Bird countered effec­ tively. He himself went in first with Hobbs, and both hit hard. In 45 minutes 72 were on the board. Then Parsons made a brilliant catch, and the Surrey captain had to go. Hobbs and Hayes almost maintained the pace, for in an hour they put on 85 for the second wicket. In all Hobbs batted 125 minutes for a fine, though not faultless, display. Hayward, Gillespie, and Spring failed; but Harrison batted