Cricket 1912

72 CKICKET : A WEEKLY EECOED OF THE GAME. A pril 30, 1912. C heltenham C ollege . Barnes, (1 ..................... Brown, H. F. Coren, E. W. Durrand, A. A. M, Kirbank, C................... Harris, H. 'J'. James, E. G. Scobie, It. M. Shelmerdine, J. A. Wise, A. V. D. Wood, G E. C. .. Not Highest Inns, out Runs Aver. score Runs Wkts. Aver. 17 2 277 18.46 48 350 15 23.33 17 0 316 18.58 62 — ___ ___ 17 8 117 13.00 33 554 22 25.18 15 0 273 18.20 72 339 12 28.25 5 2 17 5.66 8 243 12 20.25 15 0 208 13.86 35 — — ___ 15 2 263 20.23 110 731 39 18.75 13 1 263 21.91 87 — — — 14 1 156 12.00 41 290 10 29.00 16 0 380 23.75 80 ___ ___ ___ 18 0 716 39.77 95 — — — C lifton C ollege . Not Highest Craddock, A. B Inns, out Runs Aver. score Overs. Runs Wkts. Aver. 6 2 14 3.50 9 68 265 12 22.08 Errington, J. R. F. 6 0 94 15.66 51 __ __ Farnell 11. L. 8 2 190 31.66 67* __ __ __ __ Hickman, A. K. 1 1 1 383 38.30 157* __ __ __ __ Jacob, J. R. 9 0 199 2 2 .11 83 10.5 54 4 13.50 Morgan, F. R. 12 0 475 39.58 154 71.5 248 14 17.71 Murray, C. R. B. ... 8 1 104 14.85 47 177.2 576 32 18.00 llissik, C....................... 13 1 331 27.58 70 __ __ Southern, G. C. 13 0 301 23.15 102 37.3 142 5 28.40 Whitehead, G. W. E. 13 3 334 33.40 92 109 361 10 36.10 Wright J. M. 10 4 22 3.66 6 126 558 23 24.20 U ppingham S chool Inns. Not out Runs Aver Highest score Overs Runs Wkts. Aver. Burn, R. W. ... 9 1 185 23.12 76 — — __ — Hale, J....................... ... 12 0 222 18.50 60 — — __ __ Hall, A. B. ... ... 5 1 148 37.00 66 — — __ — Harrison, F. C. ... 10 2 195 24.37 49 26 164 5 32.80 Mayhew, T. G. ... 9 1 11 2 14.00 33* 71 272 8 34.00 Miller, R. A. T. 9 0 84 9.33 24 — — — — Moore, H. B. .. 10 3 291 41.57 66 — — — — Morris, C. M. .. 1 1 2 100 1 1 . 1 1 27 158.1 638 33 19.12 Trubshaw, A. R. ,... 12 3 204 22.66 71 113 450 12 37.50 Walker, M. J. L. 8 2 39 6.50 22 90 357 13 27.46 Wilshin, J. V. .. 12 0 146 12.16 41 — — — __ Young, M. K. .. 10 0 255 25.50 90 — — — — H aileybuky C ollege . Carstairs, X. M. Cope, H. V___ Hake, H. D. Halliilay H. I. McKenzie, K. N. Pawle, B. Kees, A. G. T. Strawson, F. M. Vincent, H. G. Warnes, G. G. Wooiiatt, K. H. Adams, R. E. C. Boyd, A. K. Gibbons, X. P. Hare, F. M. C. Hill, L. G.................. Hind, C. It. Hodgkinaon, G. S. lteid, O. A. Rennie, J. L, Sturgea, It. S. M, . Wilson, It. M. Not Highest Inns. out Runs Aver. score Overs Runs Wkts. Aver. 13 0 193 14.84 76 — — — — 5 0 62 12.40 28 — — — — 14 1 167 12.85 34 — — — — 10 1 143 20,42 30* 46.4 199 8 24.87 1 1 3 284 35.50 143 202.2 656 41 16.00 14 1 354 27.23 1 1 1 131.1 618 23 26.87 13 1 22 1 18.41 54 — — — — 13 1 364 30. 33 87 — — — — 14 3 430 39.09 107 205.2 633 30 21.30 4 1 25 8.33 14 — — — — 6 3 120 40.00 60* 52 193 7 27.57 B adley C ollege . Not Highest Inns, out Runs Aver. score Overs Runs Wkts. Aver. 9 1 72 9.00 32 43.3 212 8 26.67 13 0 288 22.15 54 46 205 13 15.76 5 2 60 20.00 25 — — — — 12 0 474 39.50 96 140.2 547 24 22.79 1 1 2 n o 12 .22 42* 146.3 546 19 28.74 12 1 455 41.36 80 26 130 1 130.00 13 0 2 11 16.23 44 74.1 335 19 17.64 13 5 201 25.12 52* 10 43 3 14.33 12 0 236 19.67 57 1 9 0 — 13 0 144 11.08 38 — — — — 3 1 3 1. 50 3* 8 42 2 21.00 D ulwich C ollege . Inns. Not out Runs Highest Aver, score Overs Runs Wkts. Aver. Arnold, C. V. ... 15 1 458 32.71 171 — — — — Comins, C. T. 6 0 24 4.00 12 115 477 23 20.73 Gabain, E. F. ... 12 3 205 22.78 56* — — — — Gilligan A. E. R. ... 1 1 0 153 13.91 72 114 538 19 28 31 Gilligan, F. W. 5 0 36 7.20 14 — — — — Lowe, C. N. ... 1 1 1 455 45.50 90 — — — — Loudoun-Shand, E. G. 15 3 466 38.83 113 147 573 34 16.85 Nunes, R. K. ... 16 3 770 59.23 167* — — — — Paterson, J. A. ... 1 1 2 174 19.33 57* — — — — Treadgold, G. W. ... 9 1 128 16.00 42* — — — — Waite, E. W. 6 1 40 8.00 14* 155 859 38 22.60 WANTED.—Copies of “ James Lillywhite’s Cricketers’ Annual ” for 1894 and 1895. Must be reasonable in price and in Rood condition.—Apply X .Y .Z . c/o of Cricket, 33 and 35, Moor Lane, E.C. season. McKenzie is a really good all-rounder, a forcing bat— just a trifle shaky during the first few overs, perhaps— and a consistently good bowler. He ran up 143 v. Upping­ ham, and bowled splendidly v. Cheltenham at Lord’s. Carstairs played a good innings of 78 v. M.C.C. early in the season, but did little afterwards. He is quite a useful right medium bowler, steady, if somewhat lacking in sting. Six second string men are available ; N. M. Hughes- Hallett, a slow bowler and steady bat, R. M. E. King a medium right-hand bowler and A. B. Thorne, who promises well all-round, are the best of them. The wicket-keeper’s post will be hard to fill. There were three good men in this capacity at Haileybury last year. But all have gone 1 If this difficulty can be overcome the team should be pretty well up to average. Vincent (who was three years in the eleven), Rees and Warnes are all at Cambridge ; Pawle, who has played for Herts, is at Oxford. R a d l e y , though only retaining four of last year’s eleven, regard their prospects as fairly bright. Hind, who batted particularly well in 1911, succeeds Hare as skipper. He has a strong defence and a very powerful drive, and much is expected of him. Reid, a capital wicket-keeper and a hard hitter, may be called upon as a bowler, and in that case P. C. D. Riddell is likely to keep wicket. Reid bowls fast with plenty of spin and nip off the pitch, but wants a better length. Sturges was dis­ appointing as a bat last year ; but he has style, and ought to do well this. He is a capital field, as is Gibbons, the fourth old colour, who will make a good bat if he can only learn to play straight. The most likely bowlers— bowling is usually the crux with a school side— are R. C. Keller, who was unlucky not to get his cap in 1911, and L. B. Hardy, whose lobs had five wickets for seven runs against Bradfield 2nd X I. Hare, Adams, Boyd, and Wilson, are all up at Oxford ; and the first-named, good in every branch of the game and full of keenness and vim, certainly ought to be heard of there. Lucky D u l w i c h , with eight old colours le ft ! More­ over with a captain in command already experienced in fray in the person of Loudoun-Shand, a good a) 1-rounder. Nunes, who did such big things last year, remains, with all four of the bowlers— Loudoun-Shand himself, Waite, Comins and A. E. R. Gilligan—also F. W. Gilligan, Paterson and Tread- gold, and the wicket-keeper in the person of the mighty Nunes. Lowe, Arnold, and Gabain, the three who have left, were all good bats ; but compare the case of Dulwich, with its bowling strength intact, with that of Clifton, where only one bowler of last season remains ! The school matches are with Bedford Grammar, St. Paul’s, Brighton, and Ton­ bridge, and there are also whole-day matches with the O.B.’s, the Masters, the M.C.C., and the Old Wykehamists. WISDEN’S CRICKETERS’ ALMANACKS FOR SALE. A t 25 per cent, or more under publishers’ prices. One copy of each issue only except where otherwise stated :— Issues of 1879-1880-1881-1882-1883-1884-1885-1886- 1887-1888-1892-1895-1896-1898 (4 copies) -1899 (2)-1900- 1908 (7)- 1909-1910 (2)- and 1911 (5) at one shilling and sixpence each, or twenty-seven shillings for a copy of each of the 20 issues. Issues of 1893-1894-1903 and 1907 (3 copies) at three shillings and sixpence each, or thirteen shillings for a copy of each of the four. Issues of 1890-1904 and 1905 (2, one cloth bound) at fifteen shillings each. Issues of 1889 and 1S02 at thirty shillings each. From the volumes listed a complete set from 1879 to 1911, except for 1891, 1897 and 1901, can be made up, and offers for the 30 volumes will be entertained. Buyer pays carriage. Apply : N.J.C., c/o Manager of C r i c k e t , 33 and 35, Moor Lane, Finsbury, London, E .C .

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDg4Mzg=