Cricket 1912

INDEX iii IN CEYLON. page A ll C eylon v . A ustralians ................................................................................... *35 D imbula v. D ickoya ..................................................................................................... 54 E uropeans v . C eylonese .................................................................................................... 9° M adras U nited v. Colts, v. Nondescripts, v. Sinhalese ................. ................ 3° IN INDIA. Bom bay Gymkhana v. P oona Gymkhana ... .............................................. 56 o Bombay P residen cy v. Mahommedans, 560 ; v. Parsis, 559 . H indus v. Major J. G. Grei^s XI., 560 ; v. Parsis, 560 . Mahommedans v. Bombay Presidency, 560 ; v. Parsis, 560 . P arsis v. Bombay Presidency. 55 9 ; v. Hindus, 560 ; v. Mahoramedans, 560 . : IN NEW ZEALAND. Otago, 76 ; v. Wellington, 76- Canterbury Colts, 15 ; v. Otago, 35 ; v. A u ck la n d v. Canterbury, 75 C an terbu ry v . Auckland, 75 Wellington ( 2 ), 56 . H aw ke’s Bay, v . Wellington ........................................ M arlborou gh , v . Wellington ........................................ O tago v . Auckland, 76 ; v. Canterbury, 35 ; v. Southland, 76 . S ou th lan d v. Otago* ................ ................................................................ W e llin g to n v. Auckland, 76 ; v. CanterDury ( 2 ), 56 ; v. Hawke’s,Bay, 34 v. Marlborough, 113 , 333 . IN SOUTH AFRICA. B ulawayo v . S a l is b u r y .................................................................................................. D urban v . N orthern D istricts ....................................................................... M aritzburg v. D urban ................................................................................................... N a ta l C u rrie Cup XI. v. R est o f Natal^ .......................................................... R andfontein v. W anderers A .................................................................................... T an cred 's XI. v. L ew is’s X I.................................................................................. Tow n v . R e e f (J oh a n n e sb u rg )..................................................................................... T ra n sv a a l v. R est o f South A frica n ( 2 ) .......................................................... IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. 34 1 x 3 , 333 76 393 A l l Ire la n d tv. South A frica n s............................................................................... A u stra lia v. England, 290 , 394 , 453 , 473 » v*South Africa, 197 , 354 , 413 . A u stra lia n s v. Cambridge University, 245 ; v. Dsrbyshire, 412 ; v. Durham, 432 ; v. England XI. (Norwich), 475 ; v. Essex, 155 , 3 11 ; v. C. B. Fry’s XI., 524 ; v. Gloucestershire, 451 ; v. Hampshire, 374 ; v. Kent, 490 ; v. Lancashire, 267 , 332 ; v. Leicestershire, 373 ; v. Lord Londesborough’s XI., 506 ; v. M.C.C., 178 ; v. Middlesex, 223 ; v. Northamptonshire, 153 ; v. Notts, 13 s ; v. Oxford University, 19 6 ; v. Scotland, 335 , 352 ; v. Somerset, 288 ; v. South of England, 507 ; v. Surrey, 175 , 269 ; v. Surrey and Middlesex, 491 ; v. Sussex, 393 ; v. Warwickshire, 221 ; v. Worces­ tershire, 434 ; v. Yorkshire, 247 , 3*4- B e d fo rd sh ire v . Buckinghamshire, 373 , 374 ; v. Cambridgeshire, 432 , 451 ; v. Hertfordshire, 312 , 333 ; v. Norfolk, 353 , 507 . B erk sh ire v. Buckinghamshire, 452 ; v. Cornwall, 393 , 431 ; v. Devon, 393 , 4 12 ; v. Dorset, 415 , 433 . , Buckingham shire v. Bedfordshire. 373. 374 ; v. Berkshire, 452 ; v. Hertford­ shire, 507 ; v. Wiltshire, 413 , 474 - Cam bridgeshire v. Bedfordshire, 432 , 451 ; v. Hertfordshire, 413 , 476 ; v. Lincolnshire, 392 ; v. Norfolk, 452 , 474 ; v. Suffolk, 413 , 415 . Cam bridge U n iversity v. Australians, 245 ; v. Free Foresters, 247 ; v. Hampshire, 290 ; v. H. D. G. Leveson-Gower's XI., 312 ; v. M.C.C., 332 5 v. Middlesex, 152 ; v. Oxford University, 334 ; v. Sussex, 176 , 288 ; v. Yorkshire, 19 7 ; Freshman's Match, 134 ; Seniors’ Match, 133 ; Trial Match, 134 . C h esh ire v. Durham, 270 , 476 ; v. Lincolnshire, 434,492 ; v. Northumberland, 247 , 373 ; v. Staffordshire, 431 , 492 . C o rn w a ll v . Berkshire, 393 , 431 ; v. Devon, 372 , 431 ; v. Kent II., 392 , 433 ; v. Monmouthshire, 373 , 507 . •Cumberland v. Northumberland, 394 . D erb ysh ire v. Australians, 412 ; v. Essex, 198,414 ; v. Hampshire, 22 1 , 266 ; v. Lancashire, 177 , 432 ; v. Leicestershire, 289 , 392 ; v. Northampton­ shire, 315 , 4 5 3 ; v. Notts, 332 , 476 ; v. Somerset, 246 , 354 ; v. South Africans, 134 ; v/Sussex, 196 , 223 ; v. Warwickshire, 154 , 290 . D evon v. Berkshire, 393 , 412 ; v. Cornwall, 372 , 431 ; v. Dorset, 452 , 473 ; v. Monmouthshire, 375 , 410 . D o rse t v. Berkshire, 415 , 433 ; v- Devon, 452 , 473 J v- Kent II., 4 13 , 432 ; v. M.C.C., 452 ; v. Wiltshire, 454 , 508 . Durham v. Australians, 432 ; v. Cheshire, 270,476 ; v. Lincolnshire, 313 , 394 ; v. Northumberland, 224 , 415 ; v. Staffordshire, 290 , 374 . E n glan d v. Australia, 290 , 394 , 453 , 473 I v. Rest, 134 ; v. South Africa, 246 , 335* 434 I v- Yorkshire, 524 . E ssex v. Australians, 155 *3” ; v- Derbyhire, 198 , 414 ; v. Hampshire, 451 , 473 ; v. Kent, 314 , 411 ; v. Lancashire, 393 ; v. Middlesex, 221 , 288 ; v. Northamptonshire, 175 . 269 ; v. South Africans, 474 ; v. Surrey, 267 , 490 ; v. Sussex, 332 , 435 ; v. Yorkhire, 245 , 433 . E ton v. H a r r o w ................................................................................................................... 352 Cjentlem en v. P la y ers ....................................................................................... 352 , 372 G entlem en o f Irela n d v. G entlem en o f S cotlan d ................................ 491 G lam organ v. Monmouthshire, 333 , 451 ; v. Staffordshire, 431 , 474 ; v. Surrey II., 268 , 413 ; v. Wiltshire, 353 , 433- G lou cestersh ire v. Australians, 451 ; v. Hampshire, 196 , 394 ; v. Kent, 434 , 474 ; v. Notts, 391 ; v. Somerset, 197 , 414 ; v. South Africans, 490 ; v. Surrey, 178 ; v. Sussex, 246 , 353 ; v. Warwickshire, 176 , 431 ; v. Worcestershire, 289 , 475 ; v. Yorkshire, 268 , 334 H a iley b u ry v. C heltenham .............................................................................. 4 11 H a iley b u ry v. W e llin g to n ... ............................ # ............................ 246 Ham pshire v. Australians, 374 ; v. Cambridge University, 290 ; v. Derby­ shire, 221 , 226 ; v. Essex, 451 , 473 ; v. Gloucestershire, 196 , 394 ; v. Kent, 198 , 4 13 ; v. Leicestershire, 269 , 4 12 ; v. Middlesex, 245 , 3 1 2 ; v. Oxford University, 333 ; v. Somerset, 153 , 223 ; v. South Africans, 491 ; v. Surrey, 3 13 , 475 ; v. Sussex, 373 , 454 » v- Warwickshire, 289 , 490 ; v. Worcestershire, 176 , 355 ; v. Yorkshire, 155 , 392 . H e rtfo rd sh ire v. Bedfordshire, 312 , 333 ; v. Buckinghamshire, 50 7 ; v. Cambridgeshire, 4 13 , 476 ; v. M.C.C., 453 ; v. Norfolk, 314 , 431 ; v. Suffolk, 391 , 4 31 . * 223 412 K en t v. Australians, 490 ; v. Essex, 314 , 4 11 ; v. Gloucestershire, 434 , 474 • v. Hampshire, 198 , 413 ; v. Lancashire, 22 1 , 334 ; v. Leicestershire, 245 ’ 4 5 3 ; v. M.C.C., 154 ; v. Middlesex, 353 , 476 ; v. Northamptonshire, 246 , 288 . v. Notts, 223 , 430 ; v. Somerset, 175 , 450 ; v. South Africans, 372 ; v. Surrey, 331 , 394 ; v. Sussex, 266 , 268 v. Worcestershire, 3 x 1 . • v Yorkshire, 177 , 353 . ’ K en t II., v. Cornwall, 392 , 433 ; v. Dorset, 413 , 432 ; v. Staffordshire, 333 355 ; v. Surrey II., 222 , 507 . Lancashire v. Australians, 267 , 332 ; v. Derbyshire, 177 , 432 ; v. Essex 393 • v. Kent, 221 , 334 ; v. Leicestershire, 196 , 475 ; v. Middlesex, 177 ,’ 451 ’ v. Notts, 3 1 1 , 352 ; v. South Africans, 4 11 , 473 ; v. Surrev, 288 , 355 • v’ Sussex, 154 , 374 ; v. Warwickshire, 269 ; v. Worcestershire, 245 , 314 • v* Yorkshire, 199 , 414 . L eicestersh ire v. Australians, 373 ; v. Derbyshire, 289 , 392 ; v. Hampshire 269 , 412 ; v. Kent, 245 , 433 ; v. Lancashire, 196 , 475 ; v. Northampton­ shire, 198 , 414 ; v. Notts, 176 , 222 ; v. South Africans, 433 ; v. Surrey 29 ?. 395 ; v. Sussex, 314 , 335 ; v. Warwickshire, 267 , 473 ; v. Worcester­ shire, 246 , 352 ; v. Yorkshire, 153 , 355 . L in coln sh ire v. Cambridgeshire, 392 ; v. Cheshire, 434 , 492 ; v. Durham 3*3. 394 ; v. Northumberland, 290 , 451 . M arlborough v . C heltenham ........................................................... M.C.C. v. Australians, 178 ; Cambridge University, 332 ; v. Dorset, 452 • *v! Hertfordshire, 453 ; v. Kent, 154 ; v. Norfolk, 454 ; v. Notts, 133 • v. Oxford University, 223 , 312 ; v. South Africans, 154 ; v. Wiltshire, 452 * v. Yorkshire, 134 , 491 . * M.C.C.’s A u stra lia n Team v. R est o f E ngland M iddlesex v. Australians, 223 ; v. Cambridge University, 152 ; v. Essex 221 , 288 ; v. Hampshire, 245 , 312 ; v. Kent, 353 , 476 ; v. Lancashire, 177 ’ 451 ; v. Notts, 269 , 454 ; v. South Africans, 314 ; v. Surrey, 433 , 473 • v. Sussex, 199 , 414 ; v. Warwickshire, 374 , 392 ; v. Worcestershire! 395. 490 ; v. Yorkshire, 267 , 434 . M onm outhshire v. Cornwall, 373 , 507 ; v. Devon, 375 , 410 ; v. Glamorgan, 331 , 451 ; v. Staffordshire, 270 , 492 . N o rfo lk v. Bedfordshire, 353 . 50 7 ; v. Cambridgeshire, 452 , 474 ; v. Hertford­ shire, 314 , 431 ; v. M.C.C., 454 ; v. Suffolk, 412 , 435 . N ortham ptonshire v. Australians, 153 ; v. Derbyshire, 315 , 453 ; v. Essex, i75» 269 ; v. Kent, 246 , 288 ; v. Leicestershire, 198 , 4 14 ; v. Somerset’ 353. 392 ; v. South Africans, 221 ; v. Surrey, 133 , 334 ; v. Sussex, 432 ! 473 v. Warwickshire, 245 , 354 ; v. Yorkshire, 291 , 372 . N ortham ptonshire II. v. W arw ickshire I I . , ........................................ N orthum berland v. Cheshire, 247 , 373 ; v. Cumberland, 394 ; v. Durham! 224 , 415 ; v. Lincolnshire, 290 , 451 ; v. Staffordshire, 313 , 335 . N otts, v. Australians, 135 ; v. Derbyshire, 332 , 476 ; v. Gloucestershire, 391 ; v. Kent, 223 , 430 ; v. Lancashire, 3 1 1 , 352 ; v. Leicestershire, 176 , 222 : v. M.C.C., 133 ; v. Middlesex, 269 , 454 ; v. South Africans, 267 ; v. Surrey, 198 , 414 ; v. Sussex, 245 , 35 4 ; v. Yorkslyre, 289 , 451 . O x fo rd U n iversity v. Australians, 19 6 ; v. Cambridge University, 334 • v. H. K. Foster’s XI., 220 ; v. Free Foresters, 268 ; v. Hampshire, 333 ; v. H. D. G. Leveson, Gower’s XI., 313 ; v. M.C.C., 223 , 312 ; v. Sussex, 291 Freshmen's Match, 152 ; Senior’s Match, 135 ; Trial Match, 175 . R oyal N avy v . A rmy — ......................................................................... R ugby v . M a r l b o r o u g h ........................................................................ S cotlan d v. Australians, 335 , 352 ; v. South Africans, 290 , 3 13 . Som erset v. Australians, 288 ; v. Derbyshire, 246 , 354 ; v. Gloucestershire, 197 , 414 ; v. Hampshire, 153 , 223 ; v. Kent, 175 , 450 ; v. Northampton­ shire, 353,392 ; v. South Africans, 268 ; v. Sussex, 135 , 4 1 1 ; v. Worcester­ shire, 432 , 453 ; v. Yorkshire, 220 , 475 . • South A frica v. Australia, 197 , 354 , 413 ; v. England, 246 , 335 , 434 . South A frican s v. All Ireland, 39 3 ; v. Cambridge University, 224 ; v. Derbyshire, 134 ; v. Essex, 474 ; v. Gentlemen of England, 524 ; v. Gloucestershire, 490 ; v. Hampshire, 491 ; v. Kent, 372 ; v. Lancashire, 4 11 , 473 ; v. Leicestershire, 433 ; v. Lord Londesborough’s XI., 506 ; v. M.C.C., 15 4 ; v- Middlesex, 3 1 4 ; v. Minor Counties, 394 ; v. North­ amptonshire, 221 ; v. Notts, 267 ; v. Oxford University, 173 ; v. Lionel Robinson’s XI., 506 ; v. Scotland, 290 , 313 ; v. Somerset, 268 ; v. South Wales, 289 ; v. Surrey, 153 , 245 ; v. Sussex, 450 ; v. Warwick­ shire, 332 ; v. Woodbrook, 375 ; v. Worcestershire, 195 ; v. Yorkshire. 1 77, 454- S ta ffo rd sh ire v. Cheshire, 431 , 492 ; v. Durham, 290 , 374 ; v. Glamorgan, 43i. 474 ; v. Kent II., 333,355 ; v. Monmouthshire, 270,492 ; v. Northum­ berland, 3 13 , 335 . S u ffo lk v. Cambridgeshire, 413 , 415 ; v. Hertfordshire, 391 , 431 ; v. Nor­ folk, 412 , 435 ; v. Surrey II., 394 . S u rrey v. Australians, 175 , 269 ; v. Essex, 267 , 490 ; v. Gloucestershire, 178 ; v. Hampshire, 313,475 ; v. Kent, 331,394 ; v. Lancashire, 288 , 355 ; v. Leicestershire, 290,395 ; v. Middlesex, 433 , 473 ; v. Northamptonshire, 133 . 334 ; V. Notts, 198 , 4 14 ; v. Ssuth Africans, 153 , 245 ; v. Sussex, 222 , 312 ; v. Warwickshire, 452 , 506 ; v. Worcestershire, 155 , 4 11 ; v. Yorkshire, 374 . Trial Match, 113 . S u rrey II. v. Glamorgan, 268 , 413 ; v. Kent II., 222 , 507 ; v. Suffolk, 394 ; v. Wiltshire, 372 , 432 ; v. Yorkshire II., 224 , 270 . Sussex v. Australians, 393 ; v. Derbyshire, 196 , 223 ; v. Cambridge University, 176 , 288 ; v. Essex, 332 , 435 ; v. Gloucestershire, 246 , 353 ; v. Hamp­ shire, 373 , 454 ; v. Kent, 266 , 268 ; v. Lancashire, 154 , 374 ; v. Leicester­ shire, 314 , 335 ; v. Middlesex, 190 , 414 ; v. Northamptonshire, 432 , 473 ; v. Notts, 245 , 354 ; v. Oxford University, 291 ; v. Somerset, 135 , 411 ; v. South Africans, 450 ; v. Surrey, 222 , 312 ; v. Warwickshire, 177 , 474 ; v. Yorkshire, 395 , 490 . W arw ickshire v. Australians, 2 2 1 ; v. Derbyshire, 154 , 290 ; v. Gloucester­ shire, 176,431 ; v. Hampshire, 289 , 490 ; v. Lancashire, 269 ; v. Leicester­ shire, 267 , 473 ; v. Middlesex, 374 , 392 ; v. Northamptonshire, 245 , 354 ; v. South Africans, 33 2 ; v. Surrey, 452 , 506 ; v. Sussex, 177 , 474 ; v. Worcestershire, 197 , 4 14 ; v. Yorkshire, 3 13 , 412 . W iltsh ire v. Buckinghamshire, 413 , 474 ; v. Dorset, 454,508 ; v. Glamorgan. 353. 433 v. M.C.C., 452 ; v. Surrey II., 224 , 270 . W orcestersh ire v. Australians, 434 ; v. Gloucestershire, 289,475 ; v. Hamp­ shire, 176 , 355 ; v. Kent, 3 1 1 , 373 ; v. Lancashire, 245 , 314 ; v. Leicester­ shire, 246 , 352 ; v. Middlesex, 395 , 490 ; v. Somerset, 432 , 453 ; v. South Africans, 195 ; v. Surrey, 155 , 4 11 ; v. Warwickshire, X 97 , 414 ; v. York­ shire, 331 , 473 . Y orkshire v. Australians, 247 , 314 ; v. Cambridge University, 197 ; v. Eng­ land, 524 ; v. Essex, 245 , 433 ; v. Gloucestershire, 268 , 334 ; v. Hamp­ shire, 155 , 392 ; v. Kent, 17 7 , 353 ; v. Lancashire, 199 , 4 14 ; v. Leicestershire, 153 , 335 ; v. M.C.C., 134 , 4 9 1 ; v. Middlesex, 267 , 434 ; v. Northamptonshire, 291 , 372 ; v. Notts, 289 , 451 ; v. Somerset, 220 , 475 ; v. South Africans, 177 , 454 ; v. Surrey, 374 ; v. Sussex, 395 , 490 ; v. Warwickshire, 313 , 412 ; v. Worcestershire, 331 , 473 . Y orksh ire II. v. Surrey II. .................................................................. 270 *<v* u a