Cricket 1912

r O ct . 12,1912. CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME 553 The total “ by other sides ” (that is, sides playing fewer than 4 matches) is made up of the complete aggregates of the following m atches:— Gentlemen v. Players (two), England v. Rest (Oval). M .C.C.’s Team v. Rest (L ord ’s), Navy v. A rm y; and the scores of the Free Foresters v. Oxford and v. Cambridge ; Mr. H . D. G. Leveson-G ow er’s X I. v. Oxford and v. C am bridge; Mr. H. K. Foster’s X I. v. O xford; England v. Y orkshire; Durham , X I. of E ngland (at N orwich), Surrey and Middlesex, Lord Londes- borough’s X I., the South, and Mr. C. B. F ry’s X I. v. Australians; and South W ales, W oodbrook, All Ireland, M inor Counties, Mr. L ionel R obinson’s X I., Lord Londesborough’s X I., and Gentlem en (at Hastings) v. South Africans. F ield -W ork of the V arious S ides . Matches Total No. of played. Catches. Stumpings dismissals. Side. Australians................ Cambridge University Derbyshire England (in Tests) Essex Gloucestershire Hampshire K e n t............................. Lancashire ... Leicestershire M.C.C............................. Middlesex Northamptonshirr ... Nottinghamshire ... Oxford University ... Scotland ................ Somerset South Africans Surrey ................ Sussex Warwickshire Worcestershire' Yorkshire ................ 37 11 20 6 20 18 28 29 2-1 24 9 2:5 20 20 10 4 18 37 28 33 23 22 35 215 89 102 41 107 134 182 235 173 145 64 142 129 138 65 24 118 231 157 217 137 91 202 12 11 9 2 9 17 8 35 11 12 1 13 23 15 23 4 12 12 227 100 111 43 116 151 190 270 194 157 65 155 152 145 72 26 126 257 172 240 141 103 214 I ndividual F ield -W ork . C. St. Total. C. St. T’t’l Huish (F. H .) ... ... 37 35 72 Riley (W.) ................ 16 0 If. Strudwick (H .)... ... 54 16 70 Thompson (G. J.) 16 0 1(1 Smith (E. J.) ... ... 48 10 58 Bowell (A.) ................ 15 0 16 T. A. Ward ... 29 21 50 Charlesworth (C.) 15 0 15 Buswell (W. A.) ... 24 23 47 A P. Day ................ 15 I) 16 Dolphin (A.) ... ... 34 12 46 East (W.) ................ 15 0 16 F. R. R. Brooke ... 33 10 43 Freeman (J. R.) 13 2 15 Seymour (Jas.)... ... 43 0 43 G. L. Jessop 15 0 L6 W. Carkeek ... 32 9 41 A. II. Lang 10 5 16 Oates (T.) ... 32 7 39 Langdon ( T . ) ................ 14 1 15 Street (G.) ... 22 17 39 T. J. Matthews................ 15 0 16 J. Shields ... 26 12 38 H.H. the Jam Sahib of Stone (J.) ... 28 8 36 Nawanagar ... 15 0 16 Humphries (J.)... ... 27 8 35 W. N. Riley ................ 15 0 15 Murrell (H. R.)... ... 20 13 33 Seymour (John) 15 0 16 G. A. Faulkner... ... 32 0 32 Slater ... 15 0 15 Relf (A. E.) ... ... 31 0 31 S. H. Emery ................ 14 0 14 Relf (R.) ... 30 0 30 W. B. Franklin 8 6 14 Woolley (F. E.) ... 30 0 30 Hardinge (H. T. W .) ... 14 0 1 \ Rhodes (W .) ... ... 29 0 29 G. R. H a z litt................ 14 0 14 Bale (E.) ... 17 11 28 Hearne (J. T .) ................ 14 0 14 Hirst (G. If.) ... ... 27 0 27 Hobbs (J. B.) ... 14 0 14 C. P. Carter ... ... 26 0 26 Newman (J.) ................ 14 O 14 C. Kelleway ... 26 O 26 D. C. Robinson 9 5 1 i Mead (C. P.) ... ... 26 0 26 G. A. T. V ia ls................ 14 0 14 F. R. Foster ... ... 25 0 25 Capt. E. 1. M. Barrett 13 O 13 Hendren (E.) ... 25 0 25 Fielder (A.) ................ 13 0 13 Whitehead (H.) ... 25 0 25 Hearne (J. W.)... 13 0 13 Cox (G. R.) ... ... 24 0 24 Humphreys (E.) 13 0 18 E. L. Kidd ... 24 0 24 Kilner (R.) 13 0 13 A. D. Nourse ... ... 24 0 24 Hon. H. G. H. Mul­ Tarrant (F. A.)... ... 24 0 24 holland 13 0 13 Tyldesley (J. T.) ... 24 0 24 R. H. Robinson 9 4 18 W. Bardsley ... 23 0 23 C. O. H. Sewell 13 0 1:i Drake (A.) ... 22 0 22 Vine (J.) ................ 13 0 18 King (J. H.) ... ... 22 0 22 Wells (W.) ................ 13 0 18 L. A. Strieker ... ... 20 2 22 M. P. B a ja n a ................ 12 0 12 Kennedy (A.) ... ... 21 0 21 Board (J. H . ) ................ 5 7 12 Astill (W. E.) ... ... 20 0 20 W. B. Bums ................ 12 0 12 Braund (L. C.) ... 20 0 20 P. Cartwright ... 12 0 12 T. Campbell ... 17 3 20 J. W. H. T. Douglas ... 12 0 12 Hitch (J .W .) ... ... 20 0 20 F. Mitchell ................ 12 0 \-2 H. L. Simms ... ... 20 0 20 Smith (W. C .) ................ 12 0 12 Booth (M. W .)... ... 19 0 19 R. H. Spooner................ 12 0 12 Gunn (G.) ... 19 0 19 L. J. T an cred................ 12 0 12 A. H. Hornby ... ... 18 l 19 E. W. Dillon ................ 11 0 J1 Hubble (J. C.) ... ... 19 0 19 B. S. Foster 11 0 11 Huddleston (W.) ... 19 0 19 H. Hesketh-Prichard ... 11 0 11 C. G. Macartney ... 19 0 19 Makepeace (H.) 11 0 11 Baker (C. S.) ... ... 18 0 18 E. R. Mayne ................ 11 0 11 Hayes (E. G.) ... ... 18 0 18 Mounteney (A.) 11 0 11 S. J. Pegler ... 18 0 18 Sharp (J.) ................ 11 0 11 Blythe (C.) ... 17 0 17 Shipman (W.) ... 11 0 1L Chidgey (H.) ... ... 12 5 17 Smith (of Glos.) 8 3 11 A. O. Jones ... 17 0 17 Sir A. W. White 11 0 J1 H. W. Webster... ... 15 2 17 Butt (H. R.) ................ 8 2 10 Brown (G.) ... 16 0 16 J. Daniell 10 0 10 Dean (H.) ... 16 0 16 Gunn (J.) ................ 10 0 10 W. T. Greswell... ... 16 0 16 Hayward (T. WT.) 10 0 10 Haigh (S.) ... 16 0 16 Haywood (R. A.) 10 0 10 C. B. Jennings ... ... 16 0 16 Mignon (E.) ................ 10 0 10 Kinneir (S. P.) ... 16 0 16 Pearson (F.) ................ 10 0 10 Parker (C. W. L.) ... 16 0 16 Quaife (W. G .)................ 10 0 10 J. Tasker ................ 10 0 10 The follow ing dismissed fewer than 10 opponents (by catches unless otherwise stated):— Nine each :— Arnold (E. G.), Barnes (S. F.), M. C. Bird, H. P. Chaplin, Cuffe (J. A.), Dennett (G. E.), Denton (I).), A. J. Evans, P. G. H. Fender, T. Forester, C. B. Fry, N. Haig, N. J. Holloway, Iremonger (J.), S. J. Snooke* Tyldesley (E.). Eight each :— Alletson (E.), Buckenham (C. P.), Cadman (S.), J. S. Denton, W. G. Drucc (1 st.), Hardstaff (J.), C. E. Hatfeild, Jupp (V. C. W.), Knight (A. E.), Parsons (J. H.), E. S. M. Poyntz, Robson (E.), E. M. Sprot, N. C. Tufnell (1 st.), Vincett (J. H.), W'arren (A.). Seven each :— W. S. Bird (1 st.), G. E. V. Crutchley, M. H. C. Doll, J. Douglas, Mead (W.), P. A. Perrin, Remnant (E. R.), E. A. Shaw (3 st.), D. Smith, G- W. Stephens, R. H. Twining (4 st.), Tyldesley (W .), G. C. White, Whitehead (R.). Six each :— Abel (W. J.), G. N. Bignell, Burrows (R. D.), R. D. Clark (1 St.), W. H. Denton, Dipper (A. E.), G. P. D. Hartigan, Heap (J. S.), G. W. V. Hopley, Iv. L. Hutchings, B. D. Hylton-Stewart, Jennings (D. W.), A. C. Johnston, F. H. Knott, K. A. Lister-Kaye, H. C. McDonell, R. B. Minnett, C. Mortlock, Oldroyd (E.), Root (F. C.), R. O. Schwarz, S. G. Smith, Stcdman (F.), Wass (T.), Watson (II.), C. J. B. Wood. Five each :—R. V. Bardsley, C. S. Barnett, Bates (W. E.), R. Beaumont, B. J. T. Bosanquet, W. M. Brownlee, F. S. G. Calthorpe, I. P. F. Campbell. Chester, Collins (G.), Ducat (A.), M. Falcon, F. L. Fane, J. N. Fraser,S.E.Grcgory, W. W. Hoskin, C. P. McGahey, A. E. Newton (2 st.), L. Oliver, C. Patteson, A. W. Roberts, L. C. L. Sutton, H. W. Taylor, Turner (R. E.), Walden (F.), W. J. Whitty. Four each :— A. C. P. Arnold (I st.), Beet (G.), (1 st..), Blacklidge (W. .T.), Bowley (F. L.), G. K. Chalmers (2 st..), G. B. Davies, C. W. Edwards, Rev. F II. Gillingham, Goatly (lik G.), Hadden (S.) (1 st.), W. C. Hands, Killick (E. II.), R. B. I^agden, F. T. Mann, J. W. McLaren, J. S. F. Morrison (3 st.) Morton (A.), Nott (A. s.), (2 st.), F. B. Roberts, Roberts (U. E.), Russell (E.), Rushby (T.), B. G. Stevens, M. Woosnam. Thirty-six players made three captures each— 106 caught, 2 stumped. F ifty-eight players made two captures each— 114 caught, 2 stumped. Ninety-one players made one capture each— 90 caught, 1 stumped. Substitutes were responsible for 25 catches and 1 stumping. T o ta l: 3,325 catches, 289 stumpings. Club Cricket Notes and Jottings. Mr. T . A. Bulmer, the Durham C.C.’s secretary, sends me along an interesting table of the work done by the professionals engaged in the Durham Senior League (League m atches only) this season. James (form erly of Notts), Clode (Surrey), Harry (Lancashire), Kitchener (Hants), Morris (Durham ), and Thackeray (Durham ), all county players, past or present, have been re-engaged by their respective clubs, as has W right by his. H endren (Middlesex and Durham ) shifts from Durham City to Burnmoor. Dickens (W arw ick­ shire) gives up professional cricket, as does H inchcliffe. Dodson seeks “ fresh woods and pastures new .” Mark Cox, form erly of Northants, takes H inchcliffe’s place at Eppleton. Seaham Harbour have engaged A. R. W arner, of Notts, highly recomm ended as an all-round man by John Gunn. Philadelphia had no pro. this year. DURHAM SEN IOR LE AGU E PROFE SSION ALS. B atting . B owling . Inns. N.o. R. A. H.S. O. R. W. A. Clode (Wearmouth) ... 20 3 534 31*41 111* ... 376*2 1012 68 14*88 Dickens (Seaham H.) ... 18 1 364 21*47 64* ... 331*4 860 70 12 28 Dodson (Burnmoor) ... 18 0 157 8*72 54 ... 280 795 53 15 00 Harry (S. Shields)............ 23 2 460 21*90 101* ... 390 960 113 8*49 Hendren (D’hm. City) ... 19 0 657 34*57 103 ... 347 5 807 86 9*38 Hinchcliffe (Eppleton) ... 18 0 105 5*83 28 ... 219*5 647 31 20*88 James (Whitburn)............ 19 1 619 34*82 100* ... 144*5 474 32 14*81 Kitchener (Boldon) ... 18 5 177 13*61 53 ... 360*3 671 62 10 82 Morris (Sunderland) ... 144 134 13*40 52* ... 204*2 712 111 6*41 Thackeray (Chester-le-S.) 104 150 10*00 34 ... 333*2 695 04 7*30 Weight (H endon)............... 200 428 21*40 143 ... 317 702 55 14*40 An uncomm only useful lot, too ! Am ong them the eleven men have scored 3,785 runs at an average of 20*3 per innings, and have taken 775 wickets at 10*8 per wicket. One fancies that Gentlemen of Durham v. Professionals of the Durham Senior League would make quite an attractive match. The Durham Senior League (Eastern Division) made careful enquiry into the trouble between South Shields and Philadelphia on the Philadelphia ground on August 31, and cam e down upon both clubs. Philadelphia were fined a guinea, and warned that a repeti­ tion of such conduct would lead to the club’s suspension or expulsion from the League. South Shields were censured for not completing the game. It may be remembered that T . Coulson, the South Shields and former Durham County captain, would not allow his men to bat in consequence of the bad behaviour of the spectators. The Philadelphia representative pointed out that the gate on that day was only eighteen shillings. Mr. Coulson assured the meeting that there was more than eighteen shillings’ worth of language used. On the whole one is rather surprised that his action was not endorsed by the meeting. If spectators will not behave themselves, a game should be stopped.