Cricket 1912

540 CRICKETf: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. S e p t. 28, 1912. 66), Colonel R. M. Poore (76 and 34), Captain J. H . Haughton, and Captain E . D. Tillard, who played for Somerset early this season, made nearly all the runs for the Presidency. Dr. H. D . Kanga, J. S. Warden, D . D. Driver, D . K. Kapadia, M. D . Parekh, and J. Elavia (who had 10 wickets in the m atch) did best for the Parsis. The first-named two were the only m embers o f the All India Team of last year engaged. Unfortunately the score which has reashed me is incom plete, but I hope to be able to give the full score in the next number. Follow ing on this match, M ajor G reig’s X I. m et the H indus, including Balu and Shivram of our last year’s visitors. The match was drawn after two days’ play. Balu scored 86 for once out, but his one wicket cost 99. M ajor Greig made 22 and 54*, Capt. H aughton 45 and 32*, and Capt. Tillard took 6 for 40 in the H indus’ first. M ajor B adcock, who is going to devote his leave to Somerset cricket, ran up 88 for the H osur R em ount Dept. v. N ewington C.C., Madras, on Sept. 1. In August a team from Antigua visited Montserrat, and the hom e side won on the first innings by 22 runs. T hey ran up 158 in a second innings, A . Barnard scoring 62. F. Peters did the hat trick for Montserrat. T he Antigua “ Sun,” sent m e by a kindly correspondent, has lifted several paragraphs from recent issues of C r ic k e t , but is honest enough to acknowledge the source in one case at least. The Christchurch (N .Z.) “ W eekly Free Press ” lifted entire the article on “ Cricket Costume ” printed in an early number this summer. W e don’t m in d ; C r ic k e t was mentioned. B ut there is a certain Natal paper which quotes us very often, and yet never quotes us— if you understand the subtle distinction. Is a hint sufficient ? W hich brings us to an interesting bit of news from South Africa. The Currie Cup m atches this com ing season will be played on different lines. There will be no tournam ent, as at Durban in 1910-1, and on the Rand in 1906-7 ; but the proposal is that each Union should play a series of hom e and away matches, no Union playing fewer than four such m atches (two at least to be away) qualifying for participation. There seem distinct possibilities in this schem e, though of course it has its drawbacks. Distance is one of them . This will rule out Rhodesia. Seven Unions are left as possible com petitors. It would be difficult to map out a com petition in which each should play only the m inimum number of matches ; but with three of them playing five games each a schedule on som ething like these lines m ight well be fixed up. AW AY. Transvaal. to play— W .P.—E .P .— Border (3). W estern Province ,, — E .P .—Border (2). Eastern Province ,, — G .W .—O.F.S. (2). Border ,, — Natal—G.W . O .F.S. (3). Natal „ — W .P.—G .W .(2). Griqualand W est ,, — W .P.—Trans. (2). Orange Free State ,, —Natal—Trans. (2). I am not prepared to say that this arrangement would guarantee the m inimum of travelling; but it looks feasible. Under it, Trans­ vaal would go south and east, W estern Province east, Eastern Province and Border north and west, Natal south and west, and Griqualand W est and the Free State would have away matches with their neighbours. Some recent centuries abroad :— E . H . Thom pson, 102, Montreal A. A. v.New York Veterans. C. H . W inter, 108*, Frankford v. Philadelphia. F. Austin, 110*, Colonials v. K ing’s County B. (N .Y .), Dr A. Smith, 121, W innipeg v. Chicago Wanderers (at Chicago). O. D Rasmussen. 129*, W anderers v. Los Angeles (Cal.) C. M. Blackhall, 104*, Mauhattan v K ing’s County (N .Y.). J. B . King, 108, B elm ont v. Frankford. W . Sharp, 101 (ret.), Falls of Schuylkill v. Baltim ore Sons of St. George (at Philadelphia). F. E . Huish. 108, Falls of Schuylhill v. Centennial. W . Marsden, 101*, Aura Lee v. St. James (Toronto). F . C. Gautier, 110, Bensonhurst v. Manor Field (N.Y). T . Sm ith, 103*, Wanderers v. Chicago X I. T . Smith, 112, W anderers v. South Park. By the way, it is ten, not nine balls to an over they bowl in Chicago these days, I am inform ed. A T HOME. G .W .—O.F.S. (2). Trans.—Natal—G.W . (3). Trans.— W .P. (2). Trans.—W .P (2). Border—O.F.S. (2). E. P.— Border (2). E. P.— Border (2). T he following is the team chosen to represent the Gentlemen of Philadelphia against the Australians in the opening match of the American tour, on the 27th and 28th inst. : J. B. K ing (Belm ont), H . A . Furness (M oorestown). J. L. Evans, C. C. Morris, S. W . Mifflin, and Dr. F . C. Sharpless (M erion), P. H . Clark, T . C. Jordan, W . P. Newhall, W . P. O’Neill, and F . A . Greene (German­ town). All of these have played cricket in E ngland. The Australians play in New York on October 1st and 2nd. In all probability they will have matches at W innipeg and at Victoria, B .C. The Score Book. UN ITED STATES v. C A N A D A .--At Manheim. Philadelphia, Septem ber 6 and 7, U.S. w inning by 8 wickets. First innings. C anada . Second innings. H. S. Reid, b K ing ................ ... ... 7 c Furness, b O ’Neill ... 17 P. Broadfoot, c Furness, b Clark ................ 2 b Waad ................. ... 0 O. E. Wallace, b K ing ................ .................... 1 st W inter, b Newhall ... 8 E. C. Laver, c Anderson, b Clark ................ 2 b O ’N eill ................ 9 S. A. Sm ith, b K ing ................ ... 8 b Waad ................. ... 1 F. I. C. Goodman, b Clark .................... 0 c and b O’Neill ... 8 P. E. Henderson, b Clark ................ 5 b Newhall ................ ... 35 S. R. Saunders, b K in g ................ ................ 5 c Newhall, b Waad ... 39 N. Seagram, b Clark ................ .................... 0 c W inter, b O ’N eill ... 15 W . L. Price, not out .................... 1 st W inter, b O’Neill ... 22 L. M. Rathbun, b K in g ................ ................ 9 n ot out ................ ... 0 Extras ................ .................... 0 Extras ... ... 18 Total ................ ................ 40 Total ... 172 1 st I nns . : King, 9-7-15-5 ; Clark, 8*4-4-25-5. 2 nd I nns . : Waad, 19-7-42-3 ; O’Neill, 20-2-46-5 ; M elville, 9-0-29-0 ; Newhall, 8'2-2-31-2 ; M iddleton, 4-0-6-0. U nited S tates . P. H. Clark, c Goodm an, b Price 37 C. H . W inter, lbw , b Price ... 0 R. L. Melville, b Seagram .............. 28 R. Waad, ju n ., not out .............. 2 E x tra s.......................................13 Total 16S J. B. King, c Sm ith, b Price ... 43 H . A . Furness, b Price .......... 18 R. P. Anderson, b Price .......... 11 W. P. Newhall, lbw , b Price ... 5 W. P. O’Neill, run out ... ... 4 C. C. M orris, c Sm ith, b Rathbun 7 H. W. M iddleton, c Reid, b Rath­ bun ....................................................... 0 Second innings : H. A. Furness, not out 20 ; C. C. Morris, c Rathbun, b Price 8 ; W. P. Newhall, c and b Goodm an 16 ; J. B. King, n otou t, 1. Total (2 w kts) 45. 1 st I nns . : Rathbun, 6-0-44-2 ; Price, lS ’S-l-Sl-e ; Goodman, 11-0-38-0 , . 5-0-22-1. 2 nd I nns . : Goodman, 6-0-20-1 ; Price, 5-0-25-1. MATCH ON SEPTEM BER 17. M r . G. THOMAS’S X I. v. M r . W ALTER H E A R N E ’S X I.—A t St. Law­ rence, Canterbury. Mr. Thom as’s X I., 177 for 3, dec. ; F. Dutnall 75, H. L. Bainton 59, P. E. Morfee 24*. Mr. Hearne’s X L , 94 ; W illiam Hearne 44, S. Murrin 19. MATCH ON SEPTEM BER 18. EALING P A R K v. ACTON TOWN.—A t Ealing Park. A cton Town, 113 ; C. Brooks 34, L. Dean 33. Ealing Park, 70 ; H. Johnson 24* MATCHES ON SEPTEM BER 21. WALTHAM STOW v. CHAD WELL H E ATH .—A t Wood Street. Chadwell Heath, 108 ; Sharman 47. Walthamstow, 90 for 8 ; W. G. Simm ons, 53. For W altham stow, T. D. Robinson 5 for 47. EAST BARNET v. HAM PSTEAD NOMADS,— A t East Barnet. E. Barnet, 89—and 30 for 7. Hampstead Nomads, 26—and 42. WHTTE HOUSE v. CLAPHAM RAM B LE R S.— A t Bellingham . W hite House, 162 for 9, dec. ; A . Jeacocke 44, H. A. H ooker 22*, P. Burke 20, P. Jeacocke 16. C. Ramblers, 118 for 7 ; W. H. Longhurst 38, T. A. Harris 23*, C. R. Browne 22. For C. R ., Harris 5 for 35. PARSON’S GREEN v. G .W .R.—A t Parson’s Green. G .W .R ., 97; W. E. Morgan 19*,C. E. Honeyball 18, G. F. Fear 16. P. G., 268 for 6 ; F. W. England 82, J. S. H iggs 69, F. D. Heath 56, A. C. H iggs 26. For P. G., A. C. Higgs 8 for 45. EDMONTON v. ARLINGTON AND LEYTONSTONE.—A t Edm onton. A. & L., 90; W. Ruffels 23. Edm onton, 9 2; E. Thomas 45. For A . & L., F. Wiles 6 for 50, W. huffels 4 for 16. ALBEM ARLE AND FRIERN BARNET v. NORTH LONDON.—A t Friern Barnet. A . & F. B., ISO ; L. Forbes 40, T. B uxton 31, L. Coldwell 29, W. Lyon 24. N. L., 81. For A . & F. B., L. Forbes 4 for 10. WEST KENT WANDERERS v. AM H ERST.—A t Blackheath. Am herst, 137 for 9, dec. ; A. Krouse 62*. W. K. W ., 144 for 4 ; H. W aller 69, W. D. Myers 21. For W. K. W., F. C. Perry 4 for 17. HONOR OAK v. BEDDINGTON.—At H onor Oak. H onor Oak, 68; A. Keropton 29. Beddington, 149; W. Maggs 26. G. Reay 23, F. Harrison 21. MI LL H IL L PARK v. SHEPH ERD’S BU SH.—A t East Acton. M. H. P., 162; W. P. Rowley 37, A. E. Sharp 29, A. J. Sm ith 28, R. C. Little 23. S. Bush, 142 for 6 ; M. P. Bajana S6, O. Sm oothy 25. BATTERSEA v. UPPER SYDENHAM .— At Battersea. Upper Sydenham, 100; A. S. Hoe 47. Battersea, 127 for 4 ; A. J. Trollope 46. L. E . Hiscock 33*, G. Dawdry 22, L. S. Wells 13. For Battersea, J. W hite 6 for 39. DERRICK W ANDERERS v. NORTHBKOOK.—A t Manor W ay, Blackheath. Northbrook 132; J. Leeming 34, E. C. Kowe, 30*, S. A. Selkirk 19, G. A. W ood 18, A. H . Fish 16. D. Wanderers, 85; H. R. Rennie 39, L. T. Bawcutt 15. For. D.W ., R. T. Childs 7 for 63. APTUS v. BEU LAH .— At New Beckenham. Aptus, 138 ; Curd 45, Smith 41. Beulah, 76 ; H. Clegg 37, H. Parker 24. RIVER PLA TE HOUSE v. MALD N W A N D E R E RS.— A t Malden (12 aside). R .P.H ., 143 for 9, dec. ; F. C. Buckeridge 48, N. D. T. Oliver 19, W. R. Lyne Sm ith 19. M. Wanderers, 83 for 9 ; Dr. Scott 26*, A. Rough 18. For R.P.H ., Oliver 5 for 37 BECKTON v. CLAPTON W AN DERERS.—A t Beckton (12 aside). Beckton, 130 for 9, dec. ; A. T. Keeble 23, F. Tye 21*, G. Sutton 16. C. Wanderers, 88 for 10; C. Nash 41, C. Young 15. For Beckton, H. J. Mayes 5 for 37, W. Cooper, 5 for 39. M ILL H I LL PARR II. v. SH EPH ERD ’S BUSH II.—S. Bush, 175 for 3, dec. ; W. H. Heald 54, E . A. Foley 32, F. J. Addison 26*, A . D. Nicoll 23*. M. H. P., 75 for 4 ; H. W inch 33*, E. B. Athawes 21. MI LL HILL PARK 111. v. SH E PH ERD ’S BUSH III.—S. Bush, 125; II. Davall 50. M. H. P. 54 for 6. BEU LAH II. v CHARLOTTE.—Beulah, 33. Charlotte, 45. M ELROSE v. AVENU E.—A t East Finchley. Melrose (three men short), 85 ; F. E. Gall 48, S. J. Gall 14. Avenue 49 ; Jenner 20. For Melrose, L. Cheeseman 4 for 10, A. Mason 3 for 7, S. Mason 3 for 24. EDMONTON v. OLD MANORIANS.— At Lower Edm onton. Edm onton, 138 for 5, dec. ; Richardson 51*, Darlington 30. Old Manorians, 119 for 4 ; Matthews 54*, Dewar 30. I C H A R D D A F T ’ S N O T T I N G H A M S H I R E M A R L .—Particulars apply Radcliffe*on-Trent, Notts.—(A dvt .) R Printed and published for the Proprietors by M erritt A H atcher , L td ., 33 and 35, Moor Lane, London, E.C., Septem ber 28th, 1912, Agents for Australia, &c., G ordon & G otch , London, Melbourne, Sydney, Adelaide, Brisbane, Perth, Launceston, Hobart and W ellington (N .Z. For South Africa, C entral N ews A gency , L td ., Cape Town, Johannesburg and branches.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDg4Mzg=