Cricket 1911

190 CEICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. M a y 27, 1911. too, he had only secured 1 1 wickets ; against the men from the broad-acred shire he took 8 for 122. Last season Mr. Chaplin gave him quite a considerable amount of work at the crease. His best performance was against Essex at Hove, when he had 11 for 112 in the match —8 for 79 in the first innings. F o l l o w e r s of the game cannot state that this week’s cricket has been without incident, and plenty of it, for in addition to the features already mentioned we have seen Hayward playing the part of Atlas to the Surrey Eleven, E. L. Kidd bringing success to his side by means of a wonderful bowling per­ formance, Warwickshire obtaining a victory in fine style over Leicestershire and Derbyshire gaining the verdict over Lanca­ shire at Old Trafford. All these events, save the first, were out of the ordinary, the most remarkable being perhaps the downfall of Lancashire. But what charm would cricket possess if the strongest sides always won ? Many of what are generally regarded as the weaker counties needed a tonic when the season started and several of them have already received it. May they continue to prosper ! The following are some of the latest hundreds obtained in m inor cricket: — A pril 8 .—R . Oxenham, Nundah v. Toowong (Brisbane) ... *150 ,, 8 .—N. Y . Deane, North Sydney v. Central Cumberland 162 „ 8 .—R . B . Minnett, Sydney University v. Paddington... 1 2 1 ,, 8 .—P. Newton, Petersham v. Glebe ... ... ... *12 3 ,, 28.— V. F . S. Crawford, Europeans v. Ceylonese ... 140 M ay 6 .—L . Black, Rosedale v. Upper Canada College (Toronto) (first 100 of Canadian season) ... 10 1 ,, 17 .— A. G . Knott, Manchester U niversity v. Leeds U niversity ............................................................. *100 „ 17 .—P .L . Frith, Honorable Artillery Co. v. K ing’s College 10 3 ,, 1 7 .—Capt. R . O’H . Livesay, Ju niors v. Seniors (Staff Coll., Camberleyj ... ............. ... ... 124 ,, 17. —D. Woolven, Kensington v. Fulham Palace ... *109 „ 17 . —A. E . Tunks, Kensington v. Fulham Palace ... 1 15 „ 1 7 .—A. Barton, Boston Park v. E a l i n g ................................ 1 1 3 ,, 18 .—R . V. B ardsley, Merton College v. New College(Oxford) 107 ,, 18 .—W . T. Sanctuary, Lincoln College v. Motor Club ... *104 ,, 18 .—A. C. Freem an, Lincoln College v. Motor Club ... 1 1 3 „ 18 .—W . I. Cheesman, Wadham College v. Queen’s College (O xford)............................................................ *14 3 ,, 18 .— J . H . B . Sullivan, C hrist’s College v. Downing College (Cambridge) .......................................... 118 ,, 18 .—P . E . D. Pank, Caius College 2ndX I.v.Queen’s College 2nd X I. (C am b rid g e )................................. * 114 ,, 18 .—E . H . Bowley, A. M illward’s X I. v. Eastbourne ... * 119 ,, 19 .—A. M. H arrison, Crusaders v. Trinity College (Cambridge) ............................................................ 108 ,, 19 .— H . O. Blom field, Exeter College v. New College (Oxford) ... ... ... ... ... ... 10 1 ,, 19. —C. M. Keddie, K in g’s College v. Em anuel College (Cambridge) ............................................................ 10 2 ,, 2 0 . — J . Turnbull, Chester-le-Street v. Whitburn ... 10 3 ,, 20.—A. E . Prosser, Streatham v. B e c k e n h a m .................. *129 ,, 20.—Westhorp, U .C .S. Old B oys v. South H am pstead... 109 ,, 20.— B . L . Bisgood, Richmond v. Hampstead ... ... *102 ,, 20.—E . C. Hobbs, H anwell Asylum v. St. Pancras ... 106 ,, 20.—A. P. Day, Blackheath v. Incogniti................................ 125 ,, 20.—Meyer, South Woodford v. West Green ... ... * 118 ,, 20.—R . B . Brooks, Wanderers v. U xbridge ... ... * 10 1 ,, 20.—D. H. Butcher, Upper Tooting v. Beckenham ... 110 „ 20.—E . L . Kidd, Pembroke College v. Jesu s College (Cambridge) ............................................................ 159 ,, 20.—D. Jones, Wimbledon v. Streatham .................. *165 ,, 20.—C. White, Townley Park 2nd X I. v. South Wood­ ford 2nd X I....................................................................... *135 ,, 20.—Wharton, Bedford Modern School v. H. W illet’s X I. *206 ,, 20.— E . Vost, Royton v. Heywood.............................................. 129 ,, 20.—B . Sharp, Bootle v. Formby ... ... ... ... 104 „ 20.— Todd, Liverpool v. Neston ... ... ... ... 1 1 3 ,, 20.— J. S. Curtis, Sefton v. Oxton... ... ... ... *108 ,, 20.—P. M. Rath, Pembroke v. Dublin University ... 10 1 „ 20.—W. Brown, Silverdale v. Knypersley ... ... I l l ,, 20.— G. W. Stephens, Moseley v. W alsall ... ... 13 3 ,, 20.— J. F . Stevenson, M itchell & B u tler’s v. West Brom ­ wich Dartmouth ... ... ... ... ... *128 ,, 20 .—V. Norbury, Northumberland County v. North D u r h a m .......................................................................... 109 „ 20 .—C. Gluyas, Boston Park v. Albemarle .................. *130 May 20. „ 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 20 .- ,, 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 20.- „ 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 20 .- „ 23.- „ 23.- „ 23.- -A . Ling, Boston Park v. Albem arle... - J. R. Cocke, Pallingswick v. B rondesbury................. -D. M. Whitcombe, Oxford Cryptics v. Cheltenham College -J . S.F.M orrison, Charterhouse v. Army Service Corps -K. C. Raikes, Keble College v. North Oxford -F . H . Reynolds, Tonbridge v. Tonbridge School ... -E . C. Moses, Repton School v. Derbyshire F riars... -Freem an (J.), E ssex C. & G . v. Derrick Wanderers -F. R . D ’O. Monro, Hampstead v. Surbiton................. -L . F . Bartlett, Midhurst v. Petworth P ark ................. -R. S. Clark, Aberdeen University v. St. Andrew’s U niversity......................................................................... -G . A. M cLaren, R oyal H igh School v. Carlton ... -T. E . Forsyth, Glasgow U niversity v. Cunning Park -R. G. Moir, Fettes v. Murrayfield ... -Capt. W . G. M. Sarel, The Mote v. Wye College... -R. C. Hopgood, London Pavilion v. Church E n d ... -Munds. M .C.C. and Ground v. Teddington -W. P. H arrison, M .C.C. and Ground v. Teddington -W. Westhorp, U .C .S . Old Boys v. South Hampstead -I. M. Nethersole, Keble College v. B alliol College (O x fo rd )......................................................................... -H. Parsons, St. Jo h n ’s College v. Lincoln College (Oxford) ... -Watson, Yorkshire Council v. Yorkshire 2nd X I.... *129 *107 110 109 *105 103 136 rl09 104 * 13 1 *110 111 *105 170 121 118 *209 101 109 *166 112 119 DUBLIN UN IVERS ITY v. HAMPSH IRE . Played in College Park on May 22 and 23. H am pshire won by an innings and 19 2 runs. B y very consistent batting the county ran up 449 on the opening day and on Tuesday won with the greatest ease. Score and analysis :— H a m p s h ir e . Stone, c B. G. Quinlan, b Sproule 37 Mead (C. P.), c Hone, b B. G. Quinlan ....................................... 44 Bowell, c Jones, b B. G. Quinlan 67 - - - - - - 53 58 Brown, b B. G. Quinlan . H. W. M. Yates, c Jones, b Sproule H. A. H. Smith, c Lloyd, b B. G. Quinlan ....................................... 14 D u b l in U n iv e r s it First innings. P. F. Quinlan, c Remnant, b Rogers .......... 1 R. A. Lloyd, e Bowell, b Mead ................. 3 W. P. Hone, run o u t....................................... 11 H. M. Read, c Brown, b Rogers ................. 10 A. E. Wilkinson, c Mead, b Remnant.......... 3 J. Koche-Kelly, c Mead, b Remnant .......... 12 A. Blair-White, b Kennedy ........................ 13 W. Sproule, c Stone, b Yates .................. 8 R. Jones, b Kennedy....................................... 28 F. R. S. Shaw, c Remnant, b Kennedy ... 1 B. G. Quinlan, not out ................................ 10 Byes, &c..................................... 12 A. Jacques, c Wilkinson, b Sproule 46 Kennedy, c Sproule,b P.F. Quinlan 83 Remnant, eBlair-White, b Sproule 14 Newman, b P. F. Quinlan .......... 18 Rogers, not out ........................ 0 Byes, &c................................. 15 Total ... 112 H a m p s h ir e . Total .........................440 v. Second innings c Brown, b Mead .......... 15 c Stone, b Mead............... 15 c Remnant, b Mead.......... 3 c Newman, b Mead ......... 20 b Mead................................ 6 b Brown .................. .. 1 b Mead................................ 7 c Kennedy, b Newman ... 24 b Newm an......................... 17 c Stone, b Newman......... 16 not ou t................................ 0 Byes ......................... 12 To ta l.................145 O. M R. W. O. M. R. W. J ones .......... ... 22 0 117 0 P. Quinlan ... 73 2 23 2 Sproule ... 24 0 122 4 Shaw .......... ... 2 0 10 0 B. G. Quinlan ... 29 0 176 4 D u r l in U n iv e r s it y . First innings. Second innings W. O. M R. W. O. M. R. Mead ... . . ... 10 4 14 1 ... 21 3 47 6 Rogers ... . . ... 9 ft 3 14 2 .................. Yates ... . . ... 8 1 26 1 Remnant . ... 10 5 12 ”1 6 0 2 S 0 Jacques ... . . ... 5 1 12 0 0 13 0 Kennedy 6*5 1 12 3 ... 4 Smith ... . . ... 3 1 10 0 ................. Newman 14*5 5 28 3 Brown ... 8 3 17 1 Rogers bowled one no-ball and Remnant three wides. PALLINGSW ICK v. BRONDESBURY.— Played at East Acton on May 640 runs were made for nine wickets. Score:— P a l l in g s w ic k . A. W. Hastings, b Eldrid .......... 21 G. S. F. Griffins, b Clark .......... 0 R. S. Mitchel,st Saunders,b Clark 96 J. R. Cocke, not out... ..................107 H. Gimson, b Clarke ................. 35 J. Boustead, not out ................. 17 Byes, &c.............................. 23 B r o n d e sb u r y . F. W. Ogden, run out ................. H. E. Pervin, cBamberger,bCocke E. Eldrid, run o u t......................... H. C. Ruscoe, not out ................. L. A. Woodward, run out .......... C. Faux, b Gimson......................... Byes, &c............................. Total (4 wkts)* .. ... 309 ♦Innings declared closed. A. T. Locliner, J. Houghton, R. J. Bamberger, A. J. Coxon and D. W. Bouster did not bat. Total (5 wkts) ..........340 C. Davis, C. A. Clark, A. Senechall, G. Saunders and J. Page did not bat.