Cricket 1910

260 CR ICKET : A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. J u l y 14, 1910. good bowling. It is a fact Dot generally known that Board took part in the North v. South match at Lord’s in 1891— Rylott’s benefit—before he had appeared for Gloucestershire. To few men is it given to play in such a match at the very commencement of their career in first-class cricket, but Board, although called upon to keep to four such bowlers as Ferris, Lohmann, Barnes and Shnrpe, performed with distinct credit and stamped himself as a wicket-keeper of unusual ability. WANDERERS v. GUILDFORD.—Played at Guild­ ford on July 9. T he W anderers . Dr. H.C. Pretty,bF .H . Franks ................... 4 T. C. Stafford, b F .U . Franks .................. 33 L. S. Wells, b F. H. Franks ................. 3 P. G. Gale, b Martin... 28 Hon. S. R. Beresford, run out ...................15 R. T. Crawford, not out .......................... 100 R. Kenward, b F. H. Franks ...................28 S. Colman, c G. A. Franks, b Northcott 3 A. L. Sloper, not out 2 Byes, &c.............21 Total (7 wkts)*237 *Innirgs declared closed. F. Bonner and A. H. Behrend did not bat. G uildford . F. H. Franks, c Wells, b Crawford ...........18 C. D. Harris, lbw, b Crawford.................. 1 N. Harris, b Crawford 3 F. Martin, c Beresford, b Crawford ...........14 C. E. Nightingale, c Crawford, b Stafford 23 W. Walker, b Craw­ ford ........................... 4 E. C. Smith, b Wells... 16 G.A.Franks,cBehrend, b Crawford ...........14 Capt. Jackson, not out 3 K. D. Thorburn, lbw, b Crawford ........... 0 S. H. Northcott, c Behrend ,b Crawford 0 Byes, &c............... 7 Total ...103 HAMPSTEAD v. CHISWICK PA R K .-Played at Chiswick on July 9. E. W. Hall, st Shelley, b Rowes .................. 11 F. H. Farmiloe, b Morcom ................... 0 M. Goodall, b Bowes... 5 V. Mackie, c Shelley, b Parkinson ...........29 R. B. Robertson, c Seymour,cParkinson 0 H ampstead . G. J. S. Pitts, run out M. Farmiloe, not out i W. Pollock, b Paddon H. W . Sutton, b Paddon ................... W.S. Horne, b Morcom S. Laughton, b Bowes B 6, lb 1, nb 1 ... Total 95 C hiswick P ark . A. F. Morcom, b Pitts 0 W. B Laird, c Horne, b F. H. Farmiloe ... 33 B. F. Bowes, b Potts 5 E. A. S e y m o u r, b Mackie .................. 6 H. L. Mann, c Laugh­ ton, b Horne ...........19 W. B. Shelley, b Potts 10 E. H. Walker, st Rob­ ertson, b F. H. Far­ miloe .......................... 11 H. R. Doorly, c Good- all, b Potts ...........26 H. J. R. Fry, c Hall, b F. H. Farmiloe ... 4 H. L. Paddon, c Pol­ lock, b Mackie ... 21 W. R. Parkinson, not out ........................... 5 B 22, lb 2, nb 5 29 Total ...175 HAMPSTEAD v. EALING.—Played at Hampstead on J uly 9. H ampstead . J. G. Donaldson, b F reem an .................. 44 F. E. Dempster, c Squire, b Osborne... 37 G. G. Dumbelton,cand b Squire .................. 78 R. J. Howell, c C. A. Bolter, b Hirsch ... 3 A. R. Tanner, c Free­ man, b Swainson .. 70 G. Prosdale, c Coode, b Swainson ...........16 A. A. G. Saunders, not out ...........................12 B 16, lb 3, w 4 ... 23 Total (6 wkts) *283 ♦Innings declared closed. II. G. Dunkley, E. J. Bisgood, E. L. Marsden and L. J. Marcus did not bat. E aling . A. F. Gunning, c Tanner, b Marsden 0 C. G. Swainson, b Dumbelton .......... 23 C. A. Bolter, c Tanner, b Marsden ........... 3 F. Hirsch, run out ... 5 H. Squire, c Tanner, b Marsden ........... 3 E. A. Bolter,bMarsden 6 D. R. Osborne, c Bis­ good, b Dumbelton 10 C. P. Coode, c Demp­ ster, b Saunders ... 44 J. H.Chick,cDunkley, b Bisgood ........... 3 L. Lloyd-Jones, b Dumbelton ........... 10 E. Freeman, not out ...........................14 B 7, lb 1 ... 8 Total ...129 ESSEX V. SUSSEX. Played at Leyton on July 7 and 8. r e m a r k a ble bow lin g b y k il l ic k . Essex won by 147 runs. Neither side was at full strength for this match, Essex being without Perrin, Gillingham and Fane and Sussex lacking the services of Heygate. The wicket was slow after rain, and as the batsmen had to exercise caution Essex did well to score 298. At times the rate of run-getting was very slow, and the total took slightly over four and a-half hours to obtain. At lunch four wickets were down for 92. and a fifth should have fallen, Douglas (when 24) being let off—a mistake which proved very ex­ pensive. The player named was fifth out, at 148, for 69 made in 140 minutes. He and McGahey put on 71 for the fifth wicket in 70 minutes and the latter and A. L. Gibson 58 for the sixth. Mead and Tremlin, by bright cricket, added 51 in half-an-hour and almost succeeded in causing three hundred to be chronicled. Sussex opened their innings at the end of the day, but had not scored when stumps were drawn. The play was very quiet, and at times dreary, on the second day. Rain caused the resump­ tion of the game to be postponed until twenty minutes past noon, and Sussex were then called upon to bat on a wicket which assisted the attack. The bowlers, fortunately for them, did not avail themselves to the full of the conditions, and Sussex stayed in for almost four hours for 160. There was no outstanding feature of the play, apart from its laboriousness, but it may be stated that “ Mr. Extras ” proved the highest scorer and that 34 maiden overs were bowled during the innings. Going in for the second time with a lead of 138, Essex made 27 runs without loss (Douglas and Free­ man in) in 25 minutes, when bad light and a shower combined to cause play to cease for the day. On Saturday the score was taken to 47 for the first wicket, and with Reeves in another useful stand was made. At 75, however, Killick went on to bowl and in quick succession obtained five w ickets; during the innings he took seven for only 10 runs, and Essex were all out in an hour and 50 minutes for 110. Sussex were left with 249 to win, and never appeared likely to obtain the number. Half the side were out for 30 and although Killick made 37 and Relf (A. E.) and Leach reached double-figures the innings was all over for 101. Score and analysis: E ssex . First innings. J.W.H.T. Douglas,cVincett, b Relf (A. E . ) ................. 69 Freeman (J.), b Relf (A. E.) 5 Reeves, c Relf (R. R.), b Cox ..................................15 Russell(A. C.),b Relf(A. E.) 8 Kenneth Gibson, c Butt, b 1 elf (A. E.) ...................13 C. P. McGahey, st Butt, b Rclf (A. E.) .................. 58 A. L. Gibson, c Chaplin, b L ea ch ..................................37 Bnckenliam, c Relf (R. R.), b Leach .. .................. 7 P. E. Morris, b Relf (A. E.) 12 Mead (W .), not out ...........28 Tremlin, c Butt, b Cart­ wright .......................... 31 B 7, lb 7, nb 1 ...........15 Total ...................298 S ussex . Cox (G. R.),c K. L. Gibson, b Mead .......................... 13 Vincett, c Morris,b Tremlin 3 Relf (R. R.), c Freeman, b Tremlin ..........................21 Vine, c Russell, b Tremlin 19 P. Cartwright, c K. L. Gib­ son, b Tremlin...................22 C. L. Tudor, c and b Reeves 12 Relf (A. E.), c Freeman, b Mead ..................................24 Killick, b Tremlin ........... 0 H. P. Chaplin, b Douglas 15 Leach, not out ................... 4 Butt, b Mead ................... 1 Second innings. lbw, b Killick ... 39 c Relf (R. R.), b Vincett ...........19 c Cox, b Killick... 20 c Relf (R. R.), b Killick ........... 2 c Butt, b Rclf (A. E.) ........... 2 c Relf (A. E.), b Killick .......... 0 c Vincett, b Relf (A. E.) 12 c Tudor, b Killick c Leach, b Killick b Killick .......... notout... , B 3, lb 2 Total.......... 110 c K. Gibson, b Buckenham ... 4 b Mead.................. 0 c A. L. Gibson, b Buckenham ... 1 b Tremlin ........... 1 c D o u g la s , b Tremlin ........... 7 lbw, b Tremlin ... 6 lbw, b Tremlin ... 13 c K. Gibson, b Buckenham ... 37 c K. Gibson, b Buckenham ... 1 b Buckenham ... 19 not o u t................. 4 B 18, lb 8 ... 26 B 6, lb 1 Total . ...160 E ssex . Total O. M. R. W. O. Relf (A. E.) ... 42 11 107 6 ..,. ... 19 C ox .................. 24 5 62 1 ... , ... 1 Vincett ........... 10 1 42 0 .... ... 6 Killick ........... 15 1 46 0 .... ... 7-2 Leach ........... 10. 2 26 2 ... ... 5 Cartwright .. 0-5 0 0 1 .., ...........101 M. R. W. 5 44 2 0 4 0 0 32 1 2 10 7 1 15 0 Killick bowled one no-ball. SU8SEX. First innings. O. M. R. W. 5 2 12 0 .. 33-5 12 52 3 .. 27 Buckenham Mead Tremlin .. Reeves ... Morris ... Douglas... 12 50 3 11 Second innings. O. M. R. W. ... 24 5 5 42 5 ... 5 0 15 19 10 36 Buckenham bowled one no-ball. GLAMORGAN v. SOMERSET. Played at Cardiff on July 7 and 8. HAT-TRICK BY NASH. Someset won by 172 runs. Somerset put a weaker team than usual into the field, and lost half their wickets for 90 runs before lunch on the first day. Sutton afterwards scored 62 in 105 minutes and the total reached 173. Glamorgan were dismissed for 99, only Rattenbury and J. Ban­ croft reaching double-figures. Going in again, at the end of the day, Somerset scored 6 runs for the loss of Morgan, North and Napstone—all bowled by Nash with consecutive balls. On Friday the sixth wicket fell at 23, but a stand of 90 for the seventh by Braund and Robson saved the side from a com­ plete collapse. Nash took sixteen wickets in the match for 130 runs — an excellent performance. Glamorgan quite failed to make the 215 set them to win, Robson and Lewis dismissing them for 42 in less than an hour. Score and analysis S omerset . First innings. 'Second innings, Braund, lbw, b Nash.......... 14 b Nash................... 77 Hardy, c Rees, b Creber ... 12 lbw, b Nash 0 Lewis, c E. R. Sweet-Escott, b Creber .......................... 12 b Nash ........... 1 Robson, b Nash ................. 10 c H., b E. It. Sweet-Escott... 46 Dr. F. J. Poynton,st J. Ban­ croft, b Nash ................... 0 notout................... 2 N. Napstone, b Nash........... 22 b Nash................... 0 L. C. L. Sutton, b Ratten­ bury .................................. 62 b Nash................... 0 Morgan, b N a sh ................... 16 b Nash.................. 0 Chidgey, b N ash................... 0 b Nash................... 1 J. C. White, b N a sh ........... 1 b Nash.................. 0 A. E. North, not ou t........... 16 b Nash................... 6 Lb 5, w 2, nb 1........... 8 B 1, lb 4, nb 2 7 Total ...................173 Total......... 140 G lamorgan . First innings. Second innings T. A. L. Whittington, c Napstone, b Lew is........... 3 b Robson ........... 1 S. Rees, b Robson ........... 9 cCliidgey,b Lewis 4 R. A. Gibbs, lbw, b Robson 7 b Robson ........... 0 Bancroft (W. J.), c Hardy, b Lewis .......................... 7 cChidgey,b Lewis 2 E. R. Sweet-Escott, b Rob­ son .................................. 0 b Lewis ........... 2 G. L. Rattenbury, not out 32 c Lewis, b Robson 10 H. G. Symons, b Robson .. 4 c Robson,b Lewis 2 J. Bancroft, c Hardy, b Robson .......................... 21 c Lewis,b Robson 4 Nash, c Robson, b N orth... 0 c Hardy, b Lewis 9 Creber, b N o rth .................. 7 not out ........... 0 H. Sweet-Escott,b Robson 1 b Robson ........... 2 B 7, n b l ......... 8 B 3, nb 3 ... 6 T o ta l................... 99 Total ... 42 S omerset . First innings. Second innings O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Creber .......... 28 8 82 2 ........... 25 6 47 0 Nash .......... 31 11 74 7 ........... 25 7 56 9 Rattenbury ... 2 0 9 1 .......... 10 3 26 0 E. R. Sweet-Escott 3 0 4 1 Creber bowled two wides and Nash three no-balls. G lamorgan . First innings. Second innings O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Lewis .......... 14 6 34 2 .......... 10 3 13 5 R ob son .......... 16 5 40 6 .......... 10 3 23 5 North .......... 1-4 0 17 2 . Lewis bowled four no-balls. MURDOCH — LIDIARD.—On the 7th inst., by special license, at St. Stephen’s, East Twickenham, by the Rev. Bernard Spink, Roy W. Murdoch, eldest son of William Lloyd and Jemima Murdoch, to Dorothy Blanche, elder daughter of the late John Francis and Florence Catherine Lidiard, niece of Mr. and Mrs. S. E. Meltzer, of 3, Cleveden Mansions, Richmond Bridge, East Twickenham. No cards.