Cricket 1910

254 CRICKET A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. J u l y 7 , 1 9 1 0 . NOTTINGHAMSHIRE v. NORTHAMP­ TONSHIRE. Played at Nottingham on July 4, 5 and 6. Drawn. The state of the wicket caused the side which won the toss to gain an advantage, and it was therefore not surprising to find Notts, who went in first, holding the better position at the end of .the day. Jones set his side a fine example, forcing the pace so well that he made his 82 out of 129 in 90 minutes. Ilis driving was very powerful and he made some delightful off-strokes: his chief hits were a 0 and five 4’s. Payton also was seen to advantage and helped Jones to add 76 for the third wicket in 45 minutes. Against Seymour the last six wickets went down for 25. The wicket had gradually been getting more difficult, and runs were very hard indeed to make when the visitors went in. Thompson batted resolutely, and when stumps were drawn with nine wickets down for 121 carried out his bat for 55. He was missed when 16, but his display was nevertheless a very fine one. The outstanding wicket went down with only 2 added, Northants, therefore being 78 behind on the innings. Thomp­ son, who carried out his bat for 57, played steady, but not quite faultless, crick et; he hit a 0 and four 4’s. At the end of the innings Wass took four wickets for G runs, and during the innings six for 44. Going in again Jones, for the second time in the match, played a forcing game well, his strokes all round the wicket being admirable. He was fourth out, at 114, for 58. The tail also played well, the last four wickets putting on 124 in SO minutes. Payton made a useful 47 aud Oates carried out his bat for 58, made without a mistake. The latter made his last 22 runs in five hits off Haywood. Northants were set 329 to win, and although Pool and Seymour made 79 in an hour for the first wicket seven men were out for 140 by the end of the day. The light was poor for some time, and the Notts’ bowlers carried all before them. Seymour’s dis­ missal was unusual: he played a no-ball into the hands of the wicket-keeper and, standing outside his crease, was run out. There was heavy rain during Tuesday night and the wicket became so saturated that at half-past two yesterday afternoon it was decided to abandon the match. Score and analysis:— N o tt s . First innings. Second innings. ” ' b ..8 2 c Vials, b Smith 58 b .. 5 7 A. O. Jones, c Haywood. Seymour .................. Iremonger, c Waldenr Thom pson.................. Alletson, b Thompson P.iyton, lbw, bThompson... 58 Hardstaff.c East, b Seymour 20 Gunn (J.), st Ellis, b Sey­ mour ........... Gunn (G.), < Thom pson... Oates,c Denton, b Seymour 0 Riley, c Pool, b Seymour... 6 Clifton, c Denton, b Sey­ mour .......... ................... 1 Wass, not out ................... 4 B 1, lb 3, w 1, nb 2... 7 Wells, b b Seym our...........16 c Vials, b Smith 0 c Vials, b Smith 47 b Smith ...........11 2 lbw, b Thompson 0 9 b E a st...................15 n o to u t.................58 c Wells, b East... 25 c Pool, b East ... 2 c H a y w o o d , b Thompson ... 9 B 8, nb 1... 9 Total ...250 T o t a l...........201 N orthamptonshire . C. J. T. Pool, b Riley...........15 c(G.), b G unn(J.) 45 Seymour,c Hardstaff,bWass 13 run out ...........22 G. A. T. Vials, lbw, b Wass 2 cGunn(J.),b Wass 19 S. G. Smith, c and b Riley 7 c Gunn (G.), b Thompson, not out ...........57 East, b Iremonger ...........16 Haywood, b Iremonger ... 0 Walden,c Gunn (G.),b Wass 7 J. S. Denton, c Riley, b Wass ................................... 1 Wells, b Wass ................... 0 Ellis, c Jones, b Wass ... 0 B 4, lb 1................... 5 notout................... c and b Riley ... c Iremonger, b Wass ........... lbw, b Iremonger n otou t................... Lb 9, nb 8 17 Thompson Smith ... East Seymour Haywood Total First innings. O. " 25 9 ...123 N otts . R. W. Total (7 wkts)140 Second innings. O. ... 192 ... 20 .. 15 ... 10 M. R. W. 0 79 2 60 4 1 2 39 0 38 3 0 25 Thompson bowled two no-balls and Seymour one no-ball and a wide. N orthamptonshire . Wa9S ...........19’1 4 44 6 ... Riley ........... 23 10 38 2 ... Iremonger ... 92 22 2 ... Clifton .............. 50 14 0 ... Gunn (J.) ... Riley bowled eight no-balls. 20 1 58 3 14 7 25 1 10 2 21 1 3 1 5 0 5 0 14 1 GLOUCESTERSHIRE v. HAMPSHIRE. Played at Bristol on July 4, 5 and 6. Hampshire won by seven wickets. In excellent weather, some most interesting play was seen in this match on Monday, twenty wickets going down during the day for 306 runs. During the first 80 minutes of the day Llewellyn and New­ man, bowling unchanged, dismissed Gloucestershire for 79—a very poor total, for the pitch, though soft, was easy. Mills, who batted for 45 minutes for 28, alone did anything worth mentioning. Hampshire made so promising a start that they appeared likely to obtain a very useful lead. Mead and Stone scored 65 in an hour for the first wicket, and Brown, White and Llewellyn did so well that only four men were out for 160. Dennett and Huggins afterwards bowled well, but Hampshire led by 122 ; Llewellyn made his runs at the rate of one a minute and hit six 4’s, but White was very slow, at one period being in 35 minutes without a run. Board and Robinson Jmade^. 26 without being parted when Gloucestershire went in again at the end of the day. On the Tuesday only 12 were added before Robinson was caught at the wicket. Mills did little, but Langdon was at his best. Board, after helping the latter to add 53, was caught at m id-off: he batted 95 minutes for his score of 49. Jessop scored only four singles, and with seven wickets down for 181 rain descended and prevented any further play during the day. On the third morning 22 runs were added and then Langdon’s fine innings was closed by a catch at mid-off. He made his 90 runs out of 159 scored during the two hours and three quarters he was in, hit seven 4’s, and, apart from a chance when 72, made no mistake. Huggins hit freely for 24 and Hampshire were set 103 to win. Llewellyn again bowled well, and in the match took eleven wickets for 133 runs. The visitors ob­ tained the runs necessary without much trouble, winning with seven wickets to spare. Score and analysis:— G loucestershire . First innings. Board, lbw, b Llewellyn ... 16 Langdon, b Newman........... 9 D. C. Robinson, c Brown, b L lew ellyn.......................... 4 G. W. Holloway, c Stone, b Newman .......................... G. L. Jessop, c Stone, b .Llewellyn.......................... Mills, c Mead, b Newman.. 28 c Stone, b Lle­ wellyn ........... W. H. Rowlands, c Ken­ nedy, b Llew ellyn.......... R. J. Hewlett, c White, b Newman .......................... Huggins, lbw, b Llewellyn Parker, c Brown, b Lle­ wellyn ................................. Dennett, not out................... B 2, lb 1, w 1 ........... Second innings, c Mead, b Lle­ wellyn ...........49 c Mead, b Llew­ ellyn ...........90 c Stone, b New­ man .................. 20 4 lbw, b Llewellyn 11 5 run out 1 b Newman.. b Llewellyn ... 4 c and b Newman 24 not out ......... 0 run out ........... 9 B 1, lb 2, nb 2... 5 Total ...........79 H ampshire . T otal.........224 First innings. Mead (C. P.), b Parker .. Stone, b Mills ........... ... A. C. Johnston, c Row­ lands, b Mills .................. 5 Brown, b Dennett .......... 23 Capt. W. N. White, st Robinson, b Dennett ... 20 c Llewellyn, c Hewlett. Huggins ........... .............. Bowell, c Huggins, b Parker 22 E. M. Sprot, run out.......... 3 Kennedy, st Robinson, b Dennett .......................... 1 H. A. H. Smith, b Huggins 1 Newman, notout ........... 5 Byes .......................... 4 Second innings. b Parker ...........: c Robinson, Langdon... not out........... b 42 Dennett, Parker ... 50 notout... Total B 1, lb 1, nb 1.. 3 ...................201 Total (3 wkts)103 G loucestershire . Second innings. O. M. R. W. ... 37-4 6 106 3 ... 41 9 98 5 5 1 13 0 1 0 2 0 First innings. O. M. R. W. Newman ... 12*1 1 40 4 .. Llewellyn ... 123 35 6 .. Kennedy Mead Newman bowled one wide and two no-balls. H ampshire . First innings. Dennett.. Mills Parker .. Huggins O. M. R. W. O. M B W. 33 10 80 3 ... ... 9 1 23 (i 11 3 26 2 ... ... 5 0 15 0 25-1 5 60 2 ... ... 15 5 27 2 16 5 31 2 .. ... 10 „ 2 18 0 ■'333 Langdon ... 3*2 0 17 1 Paaker bowled one no-ball. THE HAVERFORD TOUR. 1 st M atch .— v. UPPINGHAM. Played at Uppingham on June 25 and won by Uppingham by 156 runs. Harper played an admirable innings of 109. Score :— U ppingham S chool . G. W. Palmer, b Bailey 39 M. T. Ray, lbw, b Howson .................. 8 K. B. Harper, c Rob­ erts, b Downing ...109 J. D. Crosthwaite, c Taylor, b Downing 26 H. B. Moore, c Taylor, b Thomas...................25 Wilshin, b Furniss ... 21 E. G. Tomlin, b Fur­ niss .......................... 19 Hopkins, st Taylor, b Bailey ................... l Galloway, st Taylor, b Bailey ...................10 E. B. Palmer, e Fur­ niss, b Bailey ... 12 Trubshaw, not out ... 0 Byes, &c..............11 Total 281 H. A. Fumiss, st Tom­ lin, b Trubshaw ... J. S. Downing, b Moore A. L. Bailey, c E. B. Palmer, b Trubshaw C. H. Crossman, b Moore.......................... H. M. Thomas, run out H. Howson, st Topalin, b E. B. Palmer ... < W. H. Roberts, b Gal­ low ay.......... ..........] H averford C olleoe . H. S. Taylor, c Har- 22 per, b E. B. Palmer 8 W. Palmer, st Tomlin, b E. B. Palmer ... W. D. Hartshorne, not out ........................... L . R . T h o m a s , c Moore, b Galloway Byes, &c.............. Total 2 nd M atch .— v. REPTON. Played at Repton on June 27 and won by the home side by 165 runs. Score :— R epton S chool . A. P. Rutherford, c Crossman,b Bailey.. 26 I. P. F. Campbell, c Howson, b Harts­ horne ....................118 E. C. Moses, c and b Hartshorne ........... 0 D. W. Ellis, c and b Hartshorne ............ 6 F. G. Calthorpe, st Taylor, b Bailey ... 19 R. F. Popham, c Tay­ lor, b Howson ... 31 G. L. Rutherford, c Furness, b Harts- horne................... ... 15 G. L. Clark, not out... 32 W. B. Franklin, c and b B a iley ................... 4 E. T. Arden, c Harts­ horne, b Bailey ... 2 J. W. Higgs-Walker, run out .................22 Byes, &c.............. 8 Total ..283 H averford C olleoe . H. A. Furness, e Franklin, b Arden 50 J.S. Downing,c Moses, b Calthorpe ........... 7 A. L. Bailey, c Ellis, b Rutherford ...........11 C. H. Crossman, lbw, b Higgs-Walker ... 2 H. M.Thoma9,cFrank- lin, b Higgs-Walker 18 H. Howson, c G. L. Rutherford,b Arden 8 W. H.Roberts, c H iggs- Walker, b Arden ... H. S. Taylor, not out E. W. David, b Arden W.Palmer,cCalthorpe, b Arden .................. W. D. Hartshorne, c and b Arden ........... Byes, &c............... Total ...........1 3 rd M atch . —v. CHELTENHAM COLLEGE. Played at Cheltenham on June 30 and won by Cheltenham by 120 runs. Shelmerdine took five wickets for 8 runs. Score :— C heltenham C ollege . J. F. Dew, c Taylor, b D owning...................10 R. H. M. Durand, c Hartshorne, b How­ son .......................... 5 A. V. D. Wise, b Down- iiig ..........................17 G. E. C. Wood, c Fur­ ness, b Bailey ... 16 H. F. Brown, b Fur­ ness ..........................24 A. E. Ellis, run o u t... 30 A. A. Durand, b How­ son .......................... 14 R. M. Scobie, not out 24 E. W. Coren, c Baily, b Howson ........... 0 P. A. Shelmerdine, c Howson, b Downing 0 E. G. James, b Furness 10 Byes, &c...............11 Total ...161 H averford C ollege . H. A. Furness, c Wise, b J a m e s ................... J. S. Downing, b Shel­ merdine ................... A. L. Bailey, c Shel­ merdine, b Coren... L. C. Pitts, c Wood, b Coren ................... H. M. Thomas, b Coren H. S. Taylor, b Shel­ merdine ................... W. H. Roberts, not out H. Howson, c and b Shelmerdine ........... E. W. David, b Coren L. R. Thomas, b Shel­ merdine .................. W. D. Hartshorne, b Shelm erdine........... Byes, &c.............. Total ...........■