Cricket 1906

436 CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. O ct . 25, 1906. 181, Iremonger, J. (171) and Hardstaff, J. (87): Not­ tinghamshire v. Sussex, at Nottingham. 174, H. O. Pretty (200) and R. W. Hawtin (41): Northamptonshire v. Derbyshire, at Chester­ field. 162, B. J. T. Bosanquet (101) and G. W. Beldam (93): Middlesex v. Somerset, at Lord’s. 154, E. G. Wynyard (137) and F. L. Fane (61): Gentlemen v. Players, at Scarborough. 148, Killick, E. H. (164) and Relf, A. E. (62): Sussex v. Yorkshire, at Bradford. 146, R. E. Foster (198) and H. K. Foster (58) : Worces­ tershire v. Somerset, at Taunton. 143, O. L. A. Smith (77) and Relf, A E. (76): Sussex v. Surrey, at the Oval. 140, Hearne, A. (154) and K. L. Hutchings ^94): Kent v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. 138, Arnold, E. (95) and H. K. Foster (95): Worces­ tershire v. Northamptonshire, at Northamp­ ton. 613, P. A. Perrin (106) and O. P. McGahey (82): Essex v. West Indians, at Leyton. 136, Hayes, E. G. (84) and F. L. Fane (63): South v. North, at Scarborough. 132, R. H. Spooner (240) and L. O. S. Poidevin (50): Lancashire v. Somerset, at Bath. 132, R. H. Spooner (77) and F. L. Fane (67): M.O.O and Ground v. Yorkshire, at Scarborough. 131, Hayes, E. G. (155) and J. N. Orawford (43): Surrey v. Leicestershire, at the Oval. 131, Cuffe, G. (88) and Arnold. E. (71): Worcester­ shire v. Oxford University, at Worcester. 131, C. J. Burnup (89) and K. L. Hutchings (79): Kent v. England, at the Oval. 125, Hobbs, J. B. (103) and Baker A. (59 not out): Surrey v. Middlesex, at the Oval. 124, Mead. C. P. (132) and Llewellyn, O. B. (60): Hampshire v. West Indians, at Southampton 123, Payton, W. (113) and Iremonger, J. (76): Notting­ hamshire v. West Indians, at Nottingham. 122, Gunn, G. (113) and Gunn, J. (75;: Nottingham­ shire v. Northamptonshire, at Northampton. 120, E. M. Sprot (66) and Mead, O. P. (60): Hampshire v. Yorkshire, at Southampton. 116, Gunn, J. (87) and Hardstaff, J. (58); Notting­ hamshire v. Essex, at Leyton. 114, C. O. H. Sewell (87) and Board, J. H.(55); Glou­ cestershire v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. 110*, Llewellyn, O. B. (61 not out), and E. M. Sprot (46 not out): Hampshire v. Northampton­ shire, at Northampton. 109, Tyldesley, J. T. (295) and Sharp J. (59) : Lanca­ shire v. Kent, at Manchester. 107, Y. F. S. Orawford (74) and R. Joyce (32): Leices­ tershire v. Derbyshire, at Glossop. 104, Braund, L. O. (65) and H. Martyn (47): Somerset v. Warwickshire, at Edgbaston.. 102, R. V. Buxton (63) and P. F. Warner (60): Middle­ sex v. Nottinghamshire, at Nottingham. 100, A. O. Jones (66) and Gunn, G. (44): Notting­ hamshire v. M.C.O. and Ground, at Lord’s. (d).— F o u r t h W ic k b t . 225, Hirst, G. H. (169) and Grimshaw, O. H. (85): Yorkshire v. Oxford University, at Oxford. 213, Hayward, T. (208) and Goatly, E. G. (81): Surrey v. Warwickshire, at the Oval. 213, K. L. Hutchings (176) and J. R. Mason (88): Kent v. Lancashire, at Canterbury. 164, Denton, D. (138) and Hirst, G. H. (84): North v. South, at Scarborough. 151, O. H. Layne (106) and H. G. B. Austin (74): West Indians v. Essex, at Leyton. 150, A. E. Lawton (105) and E. H. D. Sewell (96): W. G. Grace’s XI. v. West Indians, at the Crystal 146, B. J. T. Bosanquet (101) and E. A. Beldam (79): Middlesex v. Somerset, at Lord’s. 146, K. L. Hutchings (90) and J. R. Mason (66): Kent v. Essex, at Tunbridge Wells. 110, C. J. T. Pool (166) and Thompson, G. J. (24); Northamptonshire v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. 134, Iremonger, J. (116) and Hardstaff, J. (88): Nottinghamshire v. ILancashire, at Notting­ ham. 131, L. G. Colbeck (175 not out) and O. O. Page (73): Cambridge University v. W. G. Grace’s XI., at Cambridge. 131,0. J. T. Pool (94) and Thompson G. J. (70): Northamptonshire v. Surrey, at Northamp­ ton. 130, H. Martyn (89) and I.ewis, A. E. (81), Somerset v. Gloucestershire, at Bath. 130, Arnold, E. (126) and Cuffe. G. (64): Worcester­ shire v. Lancashire, at Manchester. 129, Hirst, G. H. (67) and Tunnicliffe. J. (63): York­ shire v. Hampshire, at Sheffield. 125, P. R. Johnson (163) and Hardy, P. (41): Somer­ set v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. 123, P. A. Perrin (133) and F. H. Gillingham (102): Essex v. Surrey, at the Oval. 123, C. A. ollivierre(64notout)andNeedham, E. (62): Derbyshire v. West Indians, at Derby. 120, Hayes, E. G. (147)and Holland, F. O. (42): Surrey v. Hampshire, at Aldershot. 120, Tyldesley, J. T. (295) and Harry F. (58) : Lanca­ shire v. Kent, at Manchester. 116, Gunn, J. (72) and Hardstaff, J. (55): Notting­ hamshire v. Essex, at Nottingham. 116, E. S. Litteljohn (87) and Trott, A. E. (75): Middle­ sex v. Surrey, at the Oval. 113, O. J. B. Wood (137) and King, J. H. (47): Leices­ tershire v. Kent, at Maidstone. 112, T. S. Fishwick (78) and Quaife, W. G. (75): War­ wickshire v. Sussex, at Edgbaston. 112, F. L. Fane (75) and Hirst, G. H. (61): England v. Kent, at the Oval 111, E. I. M. Barrett (74) and Bowell A. (71): Hamp­ shire v. Worcestershire, at Portsmouth. 110, Kinneir, S. P. (171) and George, W. (71): War­ wickshire v. Hampshire, at Basingstoke. 110, Newstead, J. T. (80) and G. J. Y. Weigall (49 not out): M.C.O. and Ground v. Oxford Univer­ sity, at Lord’s. 110, Llewellyn, O. B. (98) and W. V. Jephson (40): Hampshire v. Somerset, at Taunton. 110, O. J. Burnup (101) and K. L. Hutchings (89): Kent v. Worcestershire, at Canterbury. 109, Denton, D. (109 not out) and Hirst G. H. (76); Yorkshire v. Nottinghamshire, at Notting­ ham. 108, Lewis, A. E. (107) and P. R. Johnson (96): Somerset v. Worcestershire, at Taunton. 106, Sharp, J. (Ill) and L. O. S. Poidevin (71): Lan­ cashire v. Leicestershire, at Blackpool. 105, Hayward, T. (219) and Holland, F. O. (55): Surrey v. Northamptonshire, at the Oval. 105, G. L. Jessop (87) and E. Barnett (31): Glouces­ tershire v. Surrey, at the Oval. 102, Arnold, E. (91) and Pearson, F. (43): Worcester­ shire v. Gloucestershire, at Worcester. 100.0. O. Page (72) and J. N. Buchanan (40): Cam­ bridge University v. W. G. Grace’s XI., at the Crystal Palace. (e ).— t F if t h W ic k e t . 199, T. S. Fishwick (129) and Baker, O. S. (66): War­ wickshire v. Somerset, at Edgbaston. 174*, Hobbs, J. B. (162 not out) and J. H. Gordon (69 not out): Surrey v. Worcestershire, at the Oval. 159, F. E. Thomas (111) and Board, J. H. (82): Gloucestershire v. Sussex, at Cheltenham. 145, Hirst, G. H. (122) and T. L. Taylor (69): York­ shire v. Sussex, at Brighton. 140, W . H. Kingston (64) and Thompson, G. J. (61): Northamptonshire v. Leicestershire, at Northampton. 139, Gunn, J. (80) and A. O. Jones (78): Nottingham­ shire v. Yorkshire, at Nottingham. 139, Killick, E. H. (164) and Relf, R. R. (70): Sussex v. Yorkshire, at Bradford. 138, Denton, D. (112 not out) and T. L. Taylor (72): Yorkshire.v. We3t Indians, at Harrogate. 134, Seymour, Jas. (116) and Hearne, A. (52): Kent v. Essex, at Tunbridge Wells. 133, Hayes, E. G. (218) and E. F. Chinnery (47): Surrey v. Oxford University, at the Oval. 131, Denton, D. (127) and Wilkinson, W. H. (53): Yorkshire v. Middlesex, at Lord’s. 128, Holland, F. O. (100) and J. N. Crawford (62): Surrey v. Nottinghamshire, at the Oval. 126, A. J. L. Hill (110) and R. M. Poore (53): Hamp­ shire v. Derbyshire, at Southampton. 117, Iremonger, J. (100 notout) and A. O. Jones (71): Nottinghamshire v. Middlesex, at Notting­ ham. 116, O. J. Burnup (169 not out) and Humphreys, E. (49): Kent v. Somerset, at Taunton. 112*, O. L. A. Smith (66 not out) and Vine, J. (66 not out): Sussex v. Essex, at Hastings. 105, F. A. Phillips (109) and Lewis, A. E. (107): Somerset v. Worcestershire, at Taunton. 105, O. L. Townsend (214) and F. E. Thomas (70): Gloucestershire v. Worcestershire, at Chel­ tenham. 104, Trott, A. E. (84) and Tarrant, F. A. (45): Middlesex v. Nottinghamshire, at Lord’s. 101, Gunn. J. (92) and Payton, W. (34): Nottingham­ shire v, Essex, at Nottingham. 100, S. G. Smith (100) and R. A. Ollivierre (67): West Indians v. Hampshire, at Southampton. 100, W. B. Burns (52) and Arnold, E. (49): Worces­ tershire v. Hampshire, at Stourbridge. 100, Killick, E. H. (86) and Cox, G. (41): Sussex v. Lancashire, at Brighton. (/).— S ix t h W ic k e t . 205, O. P. McGahey (101) and P. A. Perrin(101): Essex v. Kent, at Tunbridge Wells. 199, Baker, O. S. (144) and Lilley, A. A. (122): War­ wickshire v. Surrey, at the Oval. 191.0. J. Burnup (141)and R. N. R. Blaker (122): Kent v. Sussex, at Canterbury. 182, Hardstaff, J. (104) and King, J. H. (88): Players v. Gentlemen, at the Oval. 172, J. H. Gordon (117) and G. T. Branston (86): Oxford University v Surrey, at the Oval. 166, W. B. Burns (125) and W. E. O. Hutchings (67): Worcestershire v.Warwickshire, at Worcester 164*, Cuffe G. (103 not out) and W. B. Burns (52 not out): Worcestershire v. Kent, at Worcester. 161, Knight, A. E. (180 not out) and Coe, S. (59): Leicestershire v. Hampshire, at Leicester. 150, R. M. Poore (129) and Llewellyn, O. B. (67): Hampshire v. Sussex, at Chichester. 148, A. E. .Worsley (86) and E. L. Wright (76): Oxford University v. Worcestershire, at "Worcester 134, Relf, A. E. (189 not out) and Leach, G. (62): Sussex v. Hampshire, at Portsmouth. 134, IiOrd Dalmeny (86) and J. N. Orawford (74): Surrey v. Derbyshire, at the Oval. 133, Denton, D. (157 not out) and Tunnicliffe, J. (53): Players v. Gentlemen, at Scarborough. 132, lArnold, E. (127) and W. B. Burns (73): Wor­ cestershire v. Kent, at Worcester. 132, King, J. H. (118) and R. T. Crawford (84 not out): Leicestershire v. Warwickshire, at 131, Mead, C. P. (io9) and Langford, W. (48): Hamp­ shire v. Yorkshire, at Southampton. 131, R. A. Young (150) and L. G. Oolbeck (63): Cam­ bridge University v. Oxford University, at Lord’s. 127, Kinneir, S. P. (171) and Baker, O. S. (36): War­ wickshire v. Hampshire, at Basingstoke. 124, Baker, O. S. (106) and J. F. Byrne (62): War­ wickshire v. Surrey, at Edgbaston. 117, Llewellyn, O. B. (91) and W. V. Jephson (47): Hampshire v. Sussex, at Portsmouth. 116, Pearson, F. (97) and W. B. Burns (87): Wor­ cestershire v. Leicestershire, at Worcester. 115, W. B. Burns(109) and Cuffe, G. (30): Worcester­ shire v. Hampshire, at Stourbridge. 114, W. B. Burns (165) and Wheldon, F. (31): Wor­ cestershire v. Oxford University, at Wor­ cester 107, Gunn, G. (113) and A. O. Jones (77): Notting­ hamshire v. Northamptonshire, at North­ ampton. 107, O. A. Ollivierre (71) and Cadman, S. (61): Derby­ shire v. Hampshire, at Derby. 107, Lilley, A. A. (75) and Baker O. S. (60): War­ wickshire v. Sussex, at Hastings. 106, R. E. Foster (198) and Ouffe, G. (48): Worcester­ shire v. Somerset, at Taunton. 105, F. A. Phillips (85) and E. S. M. Poyntz (47): Somerset v. Gloucestershire, at Bristol. 103, Woolley, F. E. (77) and O. II. B. Marsham (36): Kent v. West Indians, at Oatford. (g).— S eve n th W ick et . 186, Lees, W. S. (137) and J. N. Crawford (91 not out): Surrey v. Sussex, at the Oval. 166, Relf, A. E. (189 not out) and H. L. Simms (88): Sussex v. Hampshire, at Portsmouth. 158, Knight, A. E. (125) and Jayes, T. (100): Leices­ tershire v. Warwickshire, at Edgbaston. 147, Cox, G. (167 not out) and Leach, G. (79): Sussex v. Hampshire, at Chichester. 147, Sharp, J. (117) and W. Findlay (51): Lancashire v. Sussex, at Brighton. 145, Holland, F. O. (134 not out) and Lees, W. S. (78): Surrey v. Warwickshire, at the Oval. 143, J. F. Byrne (115) and Baker, O. S. (63): War­ wickshire v. Leicestershire, at Edgbaston. 114*, Killick, E. H. (100 not out) and Leach, G. (55 not out): Sussex v. Hampshire, at Chichester 104, Thompson, G. J. (68) and East, W. (53): North­ amptonshire v. Essex, at Leyton. 103, Hayward, T. (125) and Lees, W. S. (34): Surrey v. Leicestershire, at Leicester. 102, Lilley, A. A. (101) and Baker O. S. (59): War­ wickshire v. Northamptonshire, at Peter­ borough. 100, Vine, J. (86) and Oox, G. (54): Sussex v. Oxford University, at Eastbourne (Saffrons). (A ).— E ig h th W ic k e t . 163, Reeves, W. (104) and Buckenham, O. P. (68): Essex v. Sussex, at Leyton. 140, L. G. Colbeck (92) and H. Mainprice (53): Cam­ bridge University v. M.C.O. and Ground, at Lord’s. 137, Llewellyn, O. B. (158 not out) and Langford, W. (38): Hampshire v. Kent, at Bournemouth. 136, J. N. Crawford (148) and Strudwick, H. (58): Surrey v. Gloucestershire, at Bristol. 121, Cuttell, W. R. (95) and W. Findlay (68): Lanca­ shire v. Somerset, at Liverpool. 119, A. H. Hornby (85) and W. Findlay (70 not out): Lancashire v. Warwickshire, at Edgbaston. 117, Huggins, J. H. (91) and Langdon, T. (46): Gloucestershire v. Middlesex, at Lord’s. 112, Buckenham, O. P. (66) and J. W .H. T. Douglas (66): Essex v. Gloucestershire, at Leyton. (t).— N in t h W io k e t . 131, Wheldon, F. (89 not out) and Burrows, R. D. (43): Worcestershire v. Waiwickshire, at Worcester. Ill, O. H. B. Marsham (119) and Blythe, O. (53): Kent v. Sussex, at Canterbury. 108, Arnold, E. (166) and Burrows, R. D. (47): Wor­ cestershire v. Warwickshire, at Edgbaston. 108, King, J. H. (126 not out) and Gill, G. (39): Leicestershire v. Derbyshire, at Glossop. 106, Baker, A. (155 not out) and Vigar, H. E. (28): Surrey v. Warwickshire, at Edgbaston. 105, K. L. Hutchings (125) and Huish, F. H. (17 not out): Kent v. Middlesex, at Tonbridge.