Cricket 1906

O ct. 25, 1906. CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 435 BUSSEY’S “DEJBOK DRIVERS.” TRADE ( < ccdo :-) MARK y ' GEO. G, BUSSEY & CO, , L TD . , Beg to inform Cricketers all over the world that their newPeckhamFactory, the largest and best equipped of its kind, is now completed. Provision has been made for a still further increase in output and the carrying of a finished stock of TWENTY THOUSAND BATS. Geo. G. Bussey & Co., Limited, much regret that for some time past the supply of the FAMOUS, “ DEMON DRIVERS ” has been quite inadequate to meet the demand, but during the period of re-building, when the output was necessarily restricted, the finest stock of WILLOW TIMBER has been accumulating, and now repre­ sents about 100,000 BATS. Cricketers may therefore rely upon BUSSEY’S “ DEMON DRIYERS” being the choicest selection from this enormous stock and THOROUGHLY SEASONED. The flexibility of the Handles is just what Batsmen desire, and the special form of handle covering is the admir­ ation of all players who use “ BUSSEY’S DEMON DRIYERS.” Catalogue on application to — GEO. G. BUSSEY & GO., l i m i t e d , 36 & 38, QUEENVICTORIA STREET, L O N D O N , O p Provincial and Colonial Dealers. FACTORY— TIMBER HILLS— PECKHAM.S.E. ELMSWELL, SUFFOLK. AT THE SIGN OF THE WICKKT. By F. S. A shlby -O oopkb . FEATS, FACTS AND FIGURES OF 1906. (Continued from gage 420). T able N o . 10.—TABLE SHOWING THE NUM­ BER OF PARTNERSHIPS OF 100 OR MORE RUNS IN FIRST-CLASS MATCHES DURING THE SEASON. ( a ) — F ir st W ic k e t . 380, 0. J. B. Wood (225) and Whitehead, H. (174): Leicestershire v. Worcestershire, at Wor- cester. 209, F. L. Fane (130) and J. W . H. T. Douglas (98): Essex v. Middlesex, at Leyton. 208, Hayward, T. (135) and Hobbs, J. B. (79): Surrey v. Leicestershire, at the Oval. 201, Kinneir, S. P. (136) and Devey, J.(92): Warwick­ shire v. Hampshire, at Edgbaston. 186, M. W. Payne (128) and R. A. Young (103 not out): Cambridge university v. Surrey, at the Oval. 178, Hayward, T. (143) and Hobbs, J. B. (73): Surrey v. Leicestershire, at Leicester. 176, Hobbs, J. B. (125) and Hayward,T. (68): Surrey v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. 169, Hayward, T. (109) and Hobbs, J. B. (77): Surrey v. Warwickshire, at Edgbaston. 164, Hobbs, J. B. (130) and Hayward, T. (76): Surrey v. Essex, at Leyton. 156, R. H. Spooner (114; and H. K. Foster (67): Gentlemen v. Players, at Lord’s. 150, A. O. Jones (79) and Iremonger, J. (74): Notting­ hamshire v. Essex, at Nottingham. 146, Marshal, A. (75) and W. G. Grace (64): W. G. Grace’s XI. v. Cambridge University, at Cambridge. 139, Humphreys. E. (109) and E. W. Dillon (64): Kent v. Sussex, at Brighton. 135, Hobbs, J. B. (85 not out) and Hayward, T. (82): Surrey v. Gentlemen of England, at the Oval. 134, Hayward, T. (69) and Hobbs, J. B. (61): Surrey v. Essex, at the Oval. 132, Devey, J. (106) and Kinneir, S. P. (66): Warwick­ shire v. Surrey, at Edgbaston. 132, F. L. Fane (68) and J. W. H. T. Douglas (66): Essex v. Sussex, at Leyton. 131, J. G. Greig (70) and A. C. Johnston (70): Hamp­ shire v. Derbyshire, at Southampton. 131, P. F. Warner (72) and Tarrant, F. A. (61): Middlesex v. Gloucestershire, at Lord’s. 131, Hearne, A. (154) and Humphreys, E. (81): Kent v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. 130, Bowley, F. L. (81) and H. K. Foster (57): Wor­ cestershire v. Gloucestershire, at Worcester. 129, Iremonger, J. (171) and A. O. Jones (57): Notting­ hamshire v. Sussex, at Nottingham. 129, G. Challenor (108) and O. H. Layne (44): West Indians v. Nottinghamshire, at Nottingham. 127, Hobbs, J. B. (77) and Hayward, T. (60): Surrey v. Northamptonshire, at Northampton. 125, C. J. T. Pool (87) and H. O. Pretty (51): Nor- thamptonshirev.Hampshire,at Southampton. 124, Kinneir, S. P. (100) and Devey, J. (58): Warwick­ shire v. Sussex, at Edgbaston. 122*, Hayward, T. (61 not out) and J. E. Raphael (61 not out): Surrey v. Gloucestershire, at the Oval. 122, P. F. Warner (61) and Tarrant, F. A. (55), M.C.C. and Ground v. Oxford University, at Oxford. 117*, A. O. Jones (74 not out) and Iremonger, J. (42 not out): Nottinghamshire v Leicestershire, at Leicester. 116, A. O. Jones (68)and Iremonger, J. (46): Notting­ hamshire v. burrey, at the Oval. 116, G. Challenor (63) and L. Constantine (50): West Indians v. Leicestershire, at Leicester. 115,0. J. B. Wood (148) and Whitehead, H. (41): Leicestershire v. Yorkshire, at Leicester. 114, Heap, J. S. (67) and R. H. Spooner (63): Lan­ cashire v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. 114, Iremonger, J. (68) and Day, J. W. (49): Notting­ hamshire v. Derbyshire, at Nottingham. Ill, F. L. Fane (97) and A. P. Lucas (34) : M.O.O. and Ground v. Cambridge University, at Lord’s. Ill, Bowell, A. (63) and A. O. Johnston (45): Hamp­ shire v. Northamptonshire, at Southampton (1st innings). 110, G. N. Foster (65) and O. A. L. Payne (32): Oxford University v. M.O.C. and Ground, at l ord’s. 108, A. O. Johnston (83) and Bowell, A. (50): Hamp­ shire v. Worcestershire, at Stourbridge. 108, Rhodes, W. (119) and Tunnicliffe, J. (57): York­ shire v. Leicestershire, at Leicester. 107, Tarrant, F. A. (124) and P. F. Warner (48): Middlesex v. Essex, at Lord’s. 107, Rhodes, W . (53) and Tunnicliffe, J. (53): York­ shire v. Surrey, at the Oval. 106, R. H. Spooner (65) and Rhodes, W. (45): North v. South, at Scarborough. 105, Rothery, J. W. (61) and Rhodes, W. (53): York­ shire y. Essex, at Bradford. 101, L. G. Wright (50) and Hallam,II (45): Derbyshire v. Warwickshire, at Edgbaston. 101, Devey, J. (61) and Kinneir, S. P. (54): Warwick­ shire v. Leicestershire, at Leicester. 101, Devey, J. (58) and Kinneir, S. P. (44): Warwick­ shire v. Sussex, at Hastings. (3).— S econd W icket . 210, Hayes, E. G. (218) and Hayward T.(144): Surrey v. Oxford University, at the Oval. 202*, Hirst, G. H. (117 not out) and Rhodes, W. (115 not out): Yorkshire v. Somerset, at Bath. 200, Bowley, F. L. (167 not out) and Arnold, E. (112): Worcestershire v. Leicestershire, at Wor­ cester. 190*, Hayes, E. G. (105 not out) and Hayward T., (72 not out): Surrey v. Sussex, at Brighton. 188*, Tyldesley, J. T. (123 not out) and Heap, J. S. (58 not out): Lancashire v. Warwickshire, at Edgbaston. 172, Hayes, E. G. (155) and Hobbs, J. B. (69): Surrey v. Middlesex, at Lord’s. 170, Denton, D. (107) and Rhodes, W. (83): Yorkshire v. Nottinghamshire, at Nottingham. 166, A. O. Jones (105) and Gunn, G. (78); Notting­ hamshire v. Surrey, at Nottingham. 166, R. H. Spooner (240) and Tyldesley, J. T. (68): Lancashire v. Somerset, at Bath. 161, Rhodes, W. (119) and Denton, D. (80): York­ shire v. Leicestershire, at Leicester. 151, C. A. Ollivierre (157^ and E. M. Ashcroft (70): Derbyshire v. Leicestershire, at Glossop. 148,H. K. Foster (96) and Bowley, F. L. (54 not out); Worcestershire v. Surrey, at Worcester. 141, A. O. Jones (89) and Iremonger, J. (85): Notting­ hamshire v. Middlesex, at Lord’s. 138, Denton, D. (95) and Tunnicliffe, J. (62): York­ shire v. Warwickshire, at Harrogate. 137, A. O. Johnston (105 not out) and Bowell, A. (60): Hampshire v. Northamptonshire, at South­ ampton (second innings). 136, L. G. Wright(96)and E. M Ashcroft(74): Derby­ shire v. Sussex, at Derby. 131, Rhodes, W. (93) and Denton, D. (77): Yorkshire v. Somerset, at Huddersfield. 129, Hayward, T. (100) and Hayes, E. G. (91 not out): Surrey v. Nottinghamshire, at Nottingham. 128, Killick, E. H. (125) and Vine, J. (42): Sussex v. Derbyshire, at Derby. 127, Humphreys, E. (122) and Seymour,Jas. (87): Kent v. Leicestershire, at Maidstone. 120, Bowley, F. L. (85) and Arnold, E. (39): Worces­ tershire v. Northamptonshire, at Worcester. 117, C. L. A. Smith (61) and Killick, E. H. (47): Sussex v. Warwickshire, at Edgbaston. 117, Iremonger, J. (200 not out) and Gunn, G. (46): Nottinghamshire v. Gloucestershire, at Nottingham. 117, L. Constantine (79) and O. H. Layne (63): West Indians v. Yorkshire, at Harrogate. 113, Tyldesley, J. T. (80) and Makepeace H. (49): Lancashire v. Essex at Leyton. 113, H. K. Foster (124) and Bowley, F. L. (69): Wor­ cestershire v. Warwickshire, at Worcester. Ill, F. L. Fane (87) and P. A. Perrin (62): Essex v. Middlesex at Lord’s. 110, Gox,M. (72) and W. H. Kingston (61): Northamp­ tonshire v. Worcestershire, at Worcester. 1C9, Kinneir, S. P. (100) and Charlesworth, S. (68): Warwickshire v. Sussex, at Edgbaston. 109, F. L. Fane (82) and P. A. Perrin (60): Ebsex v. Sussex at Hastings. 108, P. A. Perrin (110) and Carpenter, II. (41): Essex v. Gloucestershire, at Leyton. 106, A. C. MacLaren (58 not out) and Tyldesley, J. T. (53): Lancashire v. Warwickshire, at Man­ chester. 106, E. M. Crosse (60) and Cox, M. (51): Northamp­ tonshire v. Leicestershire, at Northampton. 106, H. C. Pretty (200) and Cox, M. (36): Northamp­ tonshire v. Derbyshire, at Chesterfield. 105, Rhodes, W. (76) and Denton, D. (49); Yorkshire v. Middlesex, at Lord’s. 104, P. F. Warner (73) and G. W. Beldam (50); Middlesex v. Nottinghamshire, at Lord’s. 101,Tyldesley, J. T. (84) and Hayward, T. (51): Eng­ land v. Kent, at the Oval. 102, P. F. Warner (137) and G. W. Beldam (30): Middlesex v. Sussex, at Lord’s. 102, Denton, D. (67) and Rhodes, W. (64): Yorkshire v. Somerset, at Bath. 101, C. J. Burnup (73) and Seymour, Jas. (57): Kent v. Somerset, at Taunton. 100, C. J. Burnup (94) and Seymour, Jas. (50): Kent v. Lancashire, at Canterbury. (c).— T h ird W ickbt . 252, C. L. Townsend (214) and O. O. H. Sewell (107): Gloucestershire v. Worcestershire, at Chelten­ ham. 206, Carpenter, H. (177) and C. P. McGahey (92): Essex v. Middlesex, at Lord’s. 191*, Iremonger, J. (200 not out) and Gunn J. (87 not out): Nottinghamshire v. Gloucester­ shire, at Nottingham. 189, C. J. Burnup, (179) and K. L. Hutchings (124): Kent v. Hampshire, at Bournemouth.