Cricket 1906

196 CRfCKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. J une 14, 1906. L E IC E S T E R S H IR E v. S U R R E Y . Played at Leicester on June 7, 8 and 9. TWO SEPARATE 100’8 BY HAYWARD. Surrey won b y 110 runs. The visitors, thanks to Hayward and Hobbs, commenced so well in this match, that 178runs were made ere the first wicket fell. Hobbs made 73 of the number in 140 minutes, but was missed when he had made 56. His chief hits were a 5 and eight 4’s. The feature of the innings was the batting of Hayward, who had the satisfaction of making his third consecutive hundred. He made 50 out of 88 in 75 minutes, 100 in two hours and a-quarter, and, in all, 143 out of 230 in 170 minutes. He hit a 5 and fourteen 4’s, and made many fine drives, including one over the pavilion. He was let off when he had made 50—an expensive mistake. Baker and Craw­ ford put on 65 for the fourth wicket in 50 minutes, and, later, Dalmeny, chiefly by a series of fine drives, made 50 in half-an-hour, and, altogether, 66 in 45 minutes, hitting eleven 4’s. After lasting five hours, the innings closed for 425, and, by the time stumps were drawn, the home side had responded with 21 without loss. On Friday De Trafford was sent back at 40, but Wood, who was missed when 10, reached 50 out of 117 in 90 minutes, and then batted another 20 minutes without augmenting his score. With King he added 42 for the second wicket, and, with Crawford, 48 for the third. The last-named hit well, but was twice missed. He made 73 out of 117 obtained whilst in, reaching 50 out of 85 in an hour. He hit a 5 and eleven 4’s, and, with Knight, put on 39 for the fourth wicket in 35 minutes. During the afternoon the Surrey fielding was frequently at fault, Crawford and Knight being each missed twice, and Wood and King each once. Knight played a very valuable innings, scoring 72 in 90 minutes, and hitting eleven 4’s ; with Coe he put on 75 for the fifth wicket in 45 minutes. In the absence of Whitehead, owing to an injured hand, theinnings closed at the fall of the ninth wicket, at 331. With a lead of 91, Surrey lost Hobbs at 25, and so greatly did the bowlers obtain the upper hand that the score was only 106 when the sixth wicket went down. Hayward, who was missed when 2, reached 50 in 85 minutes, and, at close of play, claimed 72 of the 132 runs scored. At the end of the day the visitors, with four wickets in hand, were 226 runs ahead. On Saturday Hayward quickly reached three figures, thereby setting up a record by obtain­ ing four separate hundreds in a week. He made his runs out of 213 obtained whilst in, and, altogether, batted three hours and ten minutes and hit ten 4’s. During the week he scored 512 runs and was thrice dismissed. Lees rendered great service to the side by helping to add 103 for the seventh wicket in 90minutes. The innings closed for 218,and Leicester shire were set 313 to get to win on a somewhat worn wicket. De Trafford was out without scoring, and, at the end of an hour, four wickets were down for 50. Knight and Coe then put on 64 together for the fifth partnership in 40 minutes, the latter, who was twice missed, scoring 76 in 100 minutes and hitting seven 4’s. Surrey won by 110 runs. Score and analysis:— S urrey . First innings. Second innings. Hayward, c Coe, b King ...143 c Coe, bJayes...125 Hobbs, hit wkt, b Coe ... 73 b Jayes .........14 Hayes, c Whiteside, b Jayes 0 c Whiteside, b GUI .................26 Baker (A.), c Odell, b Jayes 47 c Whiteside, b Gill ................. 0 J. N. Crawford, c White­ side, b Odell .................30 run out ............ 0 Lord Dalmeny, c Odell, b Coe ...............................66 c Jayes, bOdell 9 Moulder, c Knight, b Odell 6 b Odell ........... 0 Lees, c Crawford, b Coe ... 14 c Crawford, b Jayes ..........34 Strudwick, c Coe, b Gill ... 29 cand b Jayes ... 0 Smith (W. C.), c and b Gill 4 notout................. 1 N. A. Knox, not out .......... 8 c Wood, b Coe ... 4 B 2, lb 2, w 1 .......... 5 B 4, lb 1 ... 5 Total .................425 Total ...218 L eicestershire . First innings. Second innings. C. E. de Trafford, c Strud­ wick, b Knox .................18 cSmith,b Lees... 0 C. J. B. Wood, b Hayes ...50 c Hayes, b Knox 7 King, c Dalmeny, b Knox 25 c Hayes, b Knox 21 V. F. S. Crawford, c Baker, b Smith ........................73 c Hayes, b Knox 7 Knight, c Hayward, b Lees 72 c Hayward, b Crawford ... 37 Coe, c Moulder, b Knox ... 34 c Moulder, b Knox................76 Jayes, c Hayes, b Lees ... 12 cand b Crawford 11 W. W. Odell, not o u t..........22 c and b Hayes ... 14 Gill (G.), lbw, bMoulder ... 14 notout.................19 "Whiteside, b Crawford ... 0 b Crawford ... 1 Whitehead, absent, hurt ... 0 absent, hurt ... 0 B 6, lb 3, w 2 ... ...11 B 7, w 2 ... 9 S urrey . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Gill................. 22.3 0 102 2 ........... 18 5 57 2 Odell .......... 24 5 103 2 .......... 15 3 41 2 Coe................. 20 2 68 3 ........... 14.2 1 48 1 Jayes .......... 24 1 117 2 .......... 19 3 67 4 King ..........12 6 ?2 1 ........... Crawford ... 2 0 8 0 ................. Coe bowled a wide. L eicestershire . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Lees .......... 28 6 83 2 ........... 18 5 34 1 Knox .......... 27 2 152 3 ........... 18 1 85 4 Crawford ..1 4 4 5 42 1 ......... 14.5 1 68 3 Hayes .......... 5 0 22 1 ........... 2 0 6 1 Smith .......... 2 0 18 1 ................. Moulder........... 1 0 3 1 ................. Knox bowled two wides, and Smith and Lees one each NORTHAMPTONSH IRE v. 'W ARW ICK ­ SH IRE. Played at Peterborough on June 7, 8 and 9. Warwickshire won by ten wickets. An experiment was made of playing a first-class match at Peterborough, but it cannot be said that it was altogether a success, seeing that the game was not well patronised and that the ground was scarcely good enough for so important a fixture, the outfield being rough and uneven and the boundaries short. The home side commenced in promising style, Cox and Crosse making 70 for the first wicket in an hour. The former played a faultless innings, and was fourth out at 112 after batting for an hour and 50 minutes. Horton and Raven were dismissed by Quaife with consecutive balls, but Vials and Thompson then made a very serviceable stand. The former, who hit seven 4’s, made 34 out of 57 in three-quarters of an hour, whilst the latter, whose cutting and off-driving were very good, batted 110 minutes for 44. Quaife obtained seven wickets for 84 runs during the innings with his slow leg-breaks, keeping a good length and getting considerable spin on the ball. In the remaining 70 minutes the visitors scored 69 for the loss of Devey and Kinneir. On the following day Whittle and Charlesworth added 82 for the third wicket in ten minutes under the hour, the latter, who hit eleven 4’s and gave no chance, batting 80 minutes for 67. The rest of the innings was remarkable for a splendid display by Lilley, who scored 101 out of 165 in 100 minutes without making a mistake of any kind. He hit very hard and made several excellent drives, his chief strokes being fifteen 4’s. With Quaife he put on 64 for the sixth wicket in 40 minutes, and with Baker 102 for the seventh in an hour. The last-named scored 59 out of 168 in an hour and three-quarters, and with Fishwick added 66 for the eighth wicket in 25 minutes. During the day Warwickshire made 311 for eight wickets in 260 minutes, the innings closing for 449. The home side, 211 behind, lost Crosse and Cox for half-a-dozen and Kingston at 21. When play ceased Northamptonshire still required 152 to save the innings defeat, and had six wickets in hand. On Saturday, except for two useful partnerships, the play was very disappointing. Hawtin and East put on 84 for the fifth wicket in 80 minutes, and Horton and Raven 53 for the eighth in 35. Hawtin batted nearly two and a-half hours for 65, and played particularly well. Warwickshire won by ten wickets. Score and analysis N orthamptonshire . First innings. Second innings. E. M. Crosse, c George, b Quaife...............................27 c Lilley, b Santall 2 Cox (M.), c Lilley, b Santall 55 c Kinneir, b Har­ greave ........ 4 T. Horton, b Quaife .......... 5 run out .......34 R. O. Raven, lbw, b Quaife. 0 b Hargreave ... 31 Thompson, c Hargreave, b Whittle ........................44 c Georg*,bQuaife 6 G. A. T. Vials, b Hargreave 34 b Santall .......... 6 East, b Quaife .................31 c Lilley, b Quaife 40 W. H. Kingston, st Lilley, b Quaife...............................13 b Hargreave ... 1 R. W. Hawtin, not out ... 3 cWhittle,bQuaife 65 H. Hawkins, b Quaife ... 0 notout..............10 B. C. Smith, c George, b c Devey, b Har- Quaife................................ 7 greave .......... 5 B 12,1b 3, w4 ..........19 B 14,1b 6 ... 20 Total... ......... 331 Total... '’ ...202 Total .................238 W arw ickshire . Devey, c Smith, b Thompson ............. 26 Kinneir,cEast, b Haw­ kins ............................25 Oharlesworth,cOrosse, b Thompson ............. 67 Whittle, b Hawtin ...33 Quaife, c Kingston, b E a s t........................... 41 Total......... 224 George, b Hawtin ... 1 Lilley, b Hawkins ...101 Baker (O. S.), c Cox, b Hawtin .................59 T. S. Fishwick, b East 60 Santall, not out..........20 Hargreave, run out ... 2 B 7, lb 2, nb 5 ... 14 N orthamptonshire . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. ... 34 10 73 ‘ ... 24.4 8 O. M. R. W. Santall .......... 21 0 31* 1 Hargreave .... 22 7 42 1 Quaife ......... . 25.4 3 81 7 W hittle........ . 16 3 36 1 Charlesworth... 6 3 1) 0 Baker ........ . 2 0 9 0 18 12 50 4 2 59 3 5 22 0 1 0 0 Santall bowled four wides. W arw ickshire . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W . Thompson ... 41 4 150 2 .......... 2 1 10 0 East................ 30 0 124 2 .......... 1.2 0 6 0 Hawkins.......... 18 1 53 2 .......... Hawtin ......... 20 3 95 3 .......... C o x ................ 3 0 13 0 .......... East and Hawkins each bowled two no-balls and Thompson one no-ball. Total ...449 Second innings:—Devey, not out, 10; Kinneir, not out, 6; extras, 0.—Total (no wicket) 16. LANCASH IRE v. KENT. Played at Manchester on June 7, 8 and 9. t y l d e s l e y ’ s r e c o r d s c o r e . Lancashire won by ten wickets. Owing to his accident at Brighton, Blythe was unable to appear for Kent in this match -a great loss to the side—whilst Mason and Burnup were also absentees. For Lancashire T. Ainscough, after an absence of twelve years, reappeared, Poidevin standing down. During the opening d{iy the cricket was always bl ight, as many as53sruns being scored for the loss of ten wickets. Everything was dwarfed by Tyldesley’s innings, which is not only the largest he has ever made but also a record for the Manchester ground. He made many very fine strokes all round the wicket, and hit forty-two 4’s, eight 3’s and twenty-six 2’s. The fieldsmen favoured him to a very great extent, seeing that he was missed when he had scored 121, 134, 136, 211 and 217. Particulars of his enormous innings may be sum­ marised as follows:—He scored 52 out of 96 in 65 minutes, 100 out of 205 in 125, 150 out of 290 in 170, 200 out of 381 in 225, 250 out of 467 in 280, and, altogether, 295 out of 530 in 315. MacLaren helped him add 95 for the second wicket in 50 minutes, Sharp 109 for the third in 70, Harry 121 for the fifth in 60, Ainscough 80 for the sixth in 55, and Brearley 56 for the eighth in 30. The Lancashire innings closed for 531 after lasting 320 minutes, and, in response, Kent made 7 without loss before play ceased. On Friday Marsham and Hearne made 53 for the first wicket in 45 minutes, and Dillon and Seymour, who made only 4, added 32 for the fourth. Four wickets were down for 96, when Hubble and Dillon came together and put on 86 in an hour and a-quarter. Dillon reached 50 in 75 minutes and, in all, batted an hour and three-quarters for 76, made out of 129 obtained whilst in, without a mistake of any kind ere being dismissed by a brilliant one- handed catch in the long-field by Hornby. Day assisted Hubble to add 51 for the sixth wicket in 25 minutes, the latter being then sent back for a faultless 77 made in two hours. He reached 50 in 85 minutes. Dillon hit nine 4’s and Hubble 11. The innings closed at 282, and Kent had to follow-on 249 behind. Cuttell’s analysis of 6 for 43 on the fast wicket was a very fine one indeed. In their second innings Kent lost Humphreys for 35 made out of 45 for the first wicket in partnership with Dillon in 25 minutes. Seymour assisted the latter to add 56 for the second in 55 minutes before the amateur was sent back for 34 made out of 101 in 80 minutes. At close of play the visitors were in an almost hopeless position, requiring 76 to save the innings defeat and having only five wickets in hand. On Saturday Day and Marsham added 48 for the sixth wicket, and the latter and Woolley 75 for the seventh. Day made 54 out of 79 in 45 minutes, and Woolley 64 out of 103 in an hour and ten minutes. The last-named showed much promise of future excellence, and hit ten 4’s, the majority of them drives. The innings closed for 302, and Lancashire, obtaining the necessary 54 without loss in half-an- hour, won by ten wickets. During the match Kermode failed to take a wicket, and had 153 runs scored off him. Score and analysis :— L ancashire . A.C.MacLaren,b Fair­ service .................42 R.H.Spooner.bFielder 1 Tyldesley, not out ...295 Sharp, c Huish, b Fielder .................59 A. H. Hornby, c and b Woolley ................. 0 Harry, b Hearne ...58 T.Ainscough.bFielder 24 Total .................531 Second innings:—MacLaren.notout, 29; Spooner, not out, 27 ; extras, 0.--Total (for no wicket), 56. Cuttell, c Seymour, b Fielder .................12 W .Brearley,'cWoolley, b Fielder ................. 20 Kermode, c Hubble, b Fielder .................10 Worsley.bHumphreys 0 B 3, lb 5, nb 1, w 1 10