Cricket 1905

JtrtT 27, 1905. CRICKET: A WEEKLY RECORD OB' THE GAME. 301 E ngland . O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Cotter ... 26 4. 83 0 Laver ... 21 5 73 1 McLeod... 47 8 125 5 , Noble ...15.5 3 33 2 Annstrong 48 14 93 11 Cotter delivered one no-ball and one wide. A u s tr a lia . First innings. O. M. R. W. Second innings. O. M. R. W. 7 2 19 0 Hirst................. 2 0 12 6 ........... i * v B’rearley..........17 3 72 4 ........... 14 3 54 4 Arnold .......... 14 2 53 2 ........... 15 5 35 2 R h od es.......... 5.5 1 25 2 .......... 11.3 3 36 3 Jackson.......... f 0 26 2*.......... 5 0 20 0 LONDON AND COUNTY BANK v. LONDON AND WESTMINSTER BANK. - I'layed at Nor­ bury, on July 19, 20 and 21. L. & O. B an k. J.A.Bienvenu,b Power 73 A. A. Feaver, b Power 9 ©. W. Goddard,e C. J. Bowman, b Power 55 P. W. Hubbard, b Baker ................. 0 C R. Trowel!, b Boys 5 W. Sutton, c & b C.J. Bowman.................23 E. Musin did not bat. * Innings declared closed L. & W. B an k. E. A. Tealby, b Boys E. J?\. Robinson, b Boys................. ... G. A. Mills, not out ... P. F. Allen, not ou t. B 18,1b 7, w 3, nbl 29 Total (8 wkts.)#209 H. Wellborne, c Trow­ ell, b Bienvenu ... 0- A. G-. Power, b Musin 77 S.Bowman,c Bienvenu 10 W. Bradbery, c Allen, b Goddard ......... 4> C.J .Bowman, c Robin­ son, b Goddard ... 5' H. Oi. BoySj c Allen, b Goddard.......... 8 A. Podmore, run out 41 H. S. Baker, not out 45 L. Pitt-Brook, c Bieri- venu, b Musin ... 0 A. G. Gough, b God­ dard .......... ... .v- 2 D. Logan, not out ... O' B 3,1b 3, nb 21.. 8 Total (9 wkts.)200 LONDON AND COUNTY BANK (2) v. LONDON AND WESTMINSTER BANK (3 ).-Played at Norbury, July 18. C. W. Gibbs, c Merry, b Willson............... J. Boome, c Chapman, b Willson... .......... C. G. T. Price,.c Chap­ man, b Wood.......... H. G. White, c Smith. b Wood ................. R. V. Brown, c & b Willson .. .......... P. F. Alleny e Thomas, b Willson........ . ... L. & C. B an k ( H. A. Francis, b Wood E. Musin, b Wood ...' M. P. Bourke, c Ben­ nett, b Willson ... R. Mirst, b Willson... A. G. Stephens, not out .......... Extras ... Total 13 ... 52 L. & W. B an k H. E. Coomber, not out 55 S. G. Tyte; lbw, b BonTke ................. 0 W. Horncastle, c White, b Brown .................30 (3.) w H. C. Willson, not out 0 Extras ................. 5 Total (2 wkts.) 89 LONDON AND WESTMINSTER BANK (2) r. THORNTON HEATH.-Play at Norbury, July 17 and 18. L. & W. B ank. II. Palmer, b Hartree 39 W. Trent, b Hartee ... 13 Si. E. Junkinson, b Hartree ................. A. H. Edgar,,h Power T. W. Morland, b- ECarftflee’ ................. H. Corden, c Kerr, b Haetree ................. H. Hocking, b Power J. Watts, run out ... W. Gtetton, not out F. H. Carey, c Pod- more, b Power G. Bernard, b- Power Extras ................. Total R. S. Hartree,, c & b Cordon ... ... ... 44 G . P. Rhodes, b Jhm- kinson ................. 45 G . Logan, c Watts, b Cordon .................10 O. F. G. Wellbome, b Junkinson .......... 4 T hornton H bath . 6. J. Crossley, not out 65 H. E. Muriel c JSin- kinson, b Cordon... 2 H. E. Power,, not out 17 Extras .................36 Total ...223 TO THE OYAL From Angel, Islington, Moorgate Street, Bank, and London Bridge Station*. Travel by the Electric Railway - Trains every 3 or 4, minutes, THOMAS O. JENKIN, G eneral YORKSHIRE v. LEICESTERSHIRE. Played at Sheffield on Ju ly 24, 25 and 26. Yorkshire won by 245 runs. Without the Hon. F. S. Jackson, Rhodes and Hirst, who were all playing in the Test match, Yorkshire were greatly handicapped, and on the first day’s play they had the worst of the game, for against their total of 261 Leicestershire put up 99 for the loss of two wickets. The Yorkshire innings was chiefly remarkable for the batting of the two Wilkinsons, who each played excellent cricket and made a score of over 50. The only other men who distinguished themselves were Rotherv and Myers. For Leicester­ shire, de Trafford was in great form and played a delightful innings of 35 which lasted for about half- an-hour. When stumps were drawn Knight was not out 24, and King not out 30. A remarkable change came over the game on Tuesday morning, and although Leicestershire were in a splendid position when play began they were 124 behind at the end of their innings. Their downfall was due to the fine bowling of Ringrose, who took six of the eight wickets for 16 runs. Thanks to good scores by Rothery, Tunnicliffe, Myers and W. H. Wilkinson, Yorkshire were able to declare, leaving Leicester­ shire to make 420 runs, with three-quarters of an hour to bat before stumps were drawn for the day. In that time they scored 41 runs and lost De Trafford and Brown. Yesterday, after heavy rain, Leicester­ shire had no chance at all of making a match of it, but King and Wood played a fine game under great difficulties. Y orkshire . First innings. Second innings. H.Wilkinson,c Whiteside, b Jayes ..............................70 b Odell ........16 Rothery, c and b Gill........ 39 c Whitehead, b Jayes ....... 51 Denton, c Jayes, b Gill ...14 b Jayes .......... 4 Tunnicliffe,cBrown,b Jayes 3 b Odell ........50 Haigh, c Coe, b Jayes ...16 c Whitehead, b Jayes ....... 18 Myers, c Knight, b Coe ...39 c Jayes, b Gill 60 Lord Hawke, c Brown, b Jayes ................................ 0 b Odell ........ 10 Wilkinson (W.H.),cBrown, b Jayes .......................60 b Jayes ........57 Hunter, b J ayes.................. 0 notout................. 4 Ringrose, c and b Coe ... 1 Oyston, not out .................. 5 B 7, lb 6, nb 1 ..........14 B 20, lb !, w 1 22 Total.................. 261 Total (8 wkts) *295 * Innings declared closed. L eicestershire . First innings. Second innings. C. E. de Trafford, c Myers, b c W. H. Wilkin* Oyston..................................35 son, b Oyston... 8 C.J. B. Wood, c Tunnicliffe, b Ringrose... ................ 0 lbw b Haigh ...44 King, b Ringrose .........42 b Haigh ........ 69 Knight,cHunter.bRingrose 38 b Ringrose........ 12 Jayes,c Tunnicliffe, b Ring-....... c Hunter, b Ring­ rose ................................ 6 rose..................11 Coe, b Ringrose .................. 0 cRothery,bHaigh 0 Whitehead, c Hunter, b Ringrose ......................... 0 b Haigh .......... 3 G.B.w.Brown,lbw,bOyston 0 b Myers .......... 7 W. W. Odell, c Haigh, b Oyston................................ 2 retired ill .......... 2 Gill, not out ... .................. 0 b Haigh .......... 1' Whiteside, b Ringrose ... 0 notout................. 7 B 8, lb 4, nb 2 .... ... 14 Extras..........10 Total .......... ...13? Y orkshire . Total ...174 First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W . Jayes ........ 24 5 78 6 ... ... 24 2 110 4 OdeH ........ 15 3 45 0 ... ... 21 2 79 3 Gill .... .., ... 15 1 59 2 .... ... 5 O' 20 1 King ... ... m 4 34 0-... .... 5 1 10 0 Brown ........ 6 2 15 0 ... ... 5 0 11 0 Coe .s. ........ 7.2 2 16 2 ... ... 12 2 40 0 Gill bowled one no-ball and Coe one wide. L eicestershire . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Ringrose...........18.1 3 51 7 .......... 14 1 51 2 Oyston ......... 20 5 45 3 ........... 10 2 28 1 Myers ......... 5 1 15 0 ........... 9 1 42 1 Haigh ... ... 5 1 7 0 ........... 12.5 3 43 5 Wilkinson (W. H.)................. 2 0 5 0 ........... Ringrose bowled two no-balls. SURREY v SUSSEX. Played at Eastbourne on July 24, 25 and 26. Surrey won by seven wickets. Except for the absence of Fry and Hayward, who were engaged in the test match, these two counties were well represented. Surrey won the toss, but as heavy rain on Sunday was followed by a hot and sunny morning, they put their opponents in first. As things turned out neither side gained any advantage from this on the first innings, although in the long run the Surrey captain reaped the reward of his pluck. The first day’s cricket was very slow and unexciting. Vine and Young took the Sussex score to 37 for the first wicket in a little less than an hour. Killick made 24 in an hour, and Young, who remained until the total was 116, played with the utmost caution for two hours and a quarter, although he only succeeded in making 35. Goldie, Relf and Smith played more attractive cricket, but the last five men were out for 34 runs. Nice, who went on as first change, was by far the most successful bowler for Surrey. Before stumps were drawn Surrey had an hour’s batting, and lost two wickets for 48, Hayes being not out 20. On Tuesday, Hayes was soon out, and as Davis and Lord Dalmeny were not in luck’s way, five wickets were down for 83. Leveson-Gower then joined Raphael, who was playing well, and 41 runs were put on for the sixth wicket. Nice also stayed for some time with Raphael, the partnership producing 51. Raphael was out eighth, and played a splendid innings. With a lead of 10 runs Sussex scored 182 for eight wickets before stumps were drawn, several men making good scores. But the best innings was that of Young, who kept up an end for two hours and a half, and scored 68 by very sound cricket. Lees bowled exceedingly well, taking eight wickets, and only being hit to the extent of 81. Yesterday Lees took another wicket, but was prevented by Hayes from claiming ten victims. Surrey had to make 195 to win, and Hobbs, Hayes, Davis, Raphael and Lord Dalmeny all batted so well that their side gained an easy victory at three o’clock. S ussex . First innings. Sacond innings. R. A. Young, b Hayes ... 35 c Holland, b Lees 68 Vine, b N ice........................16 c Strudwick, b Lees................. 9' Killick, b H ayes.................24 c Hayes, b Lees... 16 K. O. Goldie, cNice, b Lees 20 b Lees................ 14 Relf, b N ic e ........................27 c Nice, b Lees ... 2 C. L. A. Smith, not out ... 33 c Strudwick, b Lees................. 1 Leach, b Nice .......... ... 0 c Hayes, b Lees.. 19 P . B. Chapman, b Nice ... 13 c Strudwick, b Lees.................19 Cox, c Strudwick, b Nice... 5 c Hobbs, b Hayes 18 Butt, c Strudwick, b Nice... 0 c Davis, b Lees... 5 Seymour, c Hobbs, b Lees 1 not out................. 1 B 16, lb 4, w 3,nb 1... 24 B 9, lb 4 ..........12 Total... Total ...184 SURRBY. First innings. Second innings. Hobbs, b Relf .................... 8 c Butt, b Relf ... 36 Hayes, b Vine ................. 26 notout.................. 49 Baker, st Butt, b Vine ... 20 J. E. Raphael, c Vine,b Cox 64 cChapman.b Sey­ mour .......... 38 Davis, c Butt, b C o x ............. 0 notout.................. 41 Lord Dalmeny, b Vine ... 4 c Goldie, b Cox 17- H. D. G. Leveson-Gower, c Relf, b Cox ................. 25 Nice, c Young, b-Cox... ...25 Lees, c Goldie, b Cox............. 0 N. A. Knox, not o u t ............. 0 Strudwick, lbw, b Goldie ... 4 B 6, lb 3, w 2, nb 1 ... 12 Extras ... ... 14 Total .................. 188 Total (3 wkts) 195 S ussex . O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W.. Lees .v.. ... ...30.211 62 2 ................................. 35 12 81 Knox .......... 12 1 390 ........... 12 1 43 0 Nice................. 19 8 40 6 .......... 11 3 29 0 Hayes .......... 17 5 33 2 ... ...11-4 3 19 1 S urrey . First innings. Second innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Cox ..v ................ 22 4 68 5 ................ 13 2 32 0 R e lf................. 15 5 33 1 ........... 16 2 34 1 V ine................. 12 5 53 3 ........... 182 0 61 1 Killick ... ... 4 1 170 .......... Goldie .... 3.125 1 ...................... 2 060 Seymour ... 8f4 1 48 1 Goldie bowled two wides and Vine one no-ball. KENT v. GLOUCESTERSHIRE. Played at Catford on July 24, 25 and 26. Kent won by 142 xuns. The first day’s play in this match was noticeable for the brilliant batting of Dillon, the fierce hitting of Blaker, and the surprising downfall of Glouces­ tershire batsmen. Dillon was at the wicket for three hours and a quarter, and hit sixteen fours in an almost faultless innings. His partnership"with Day produced 89 runs in a little over an hour. The batting of Blaker was undoubtedly the chief feature of the day’s cricket. He hit with such splendid determination that after he had been batting for an hour and five minutes he reached his hundred out of 166, and in another ten minutes he made 20 more runs. Among his hits were twenty 4*s. Gloucesy